Empirical wavelet transform based automated alcoholism detecting using EEG signal features

被引:34
作者
Anuragi, Arti [1 ]
Sisodia, Dilip Singh [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol Raipur, GE Rd, Raipur 492010, Madhya Pradesh, India
关键词
Signal processing; Electroencephalograms (EEGs); Alcoholism; Empirical wavelet transform (EWT); Hilbert-Huang transform (HHT); TIME; CLASSIFICATION; DECOMPOSITION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.bspc.2019.101777
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals are well used to characterize the brain states and actions. In this paper, a novel empirical wavelet transform (EWT) based machine learning framework is proposed for the classification of alcoholic and normal subjects using EEG signals. In the framework, the adaptive filtering is used to extract Time-Frequency-domain features from Hilbert-Huang Transform (HHT). The boundary detection method is used for segmenting the Fourier spectrum of the EEG signals to represent in scale-space. Hilbert-Huang Transform (HHT) examines time and frequency information in a single domain using instantaneous amplitude (IA) and instantaneous frequency (IF). The IA and IF are used to form intrinsic mode functions (IMF). The empirical wavelets transform (EWT) using Hilbert-Huang transforms (HHT) extract the statistical features such as mean, standard deviation, variance, skewness, kurtosis, Shannon entropy, and log entropy from each of the intrinsic mode functions (IMF). The extracted features are evaluated by t-test for finding the most significant features. The significant feature matrix is fed to various classification algorithms listed as least square-support vector machine (LS-SVM), support vector machine (SVM), Naive Bayes (NB), and k-Nearest Neighbors (K-NN). The leave-one-out cross validation (LOOCV) is used for training and testing of used models to minimize the chance of overfitting. The results suggest that the highest numbers of the positive samples are obtained using LS-SVM classifier with the polynomial kernel. The LS-SVM also achieved an average accuracy of 98.75%, the sensitivity 98.35%, specificity 99.16%, the precision 99.17%, F-measure 98.76%, and Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) 97.50%. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] American Clinical Neurophysiology Society Guideline 2: Guidelines for Standard Electrode Position Nomenclature
    Acharya, Jayant N.
    Hani, Abeer
    Cheek, Janna
    Thirumala, Partha
    Tsuchida, Tammy N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 33 (04) : 308 - 311
  • [2] Computer-aided diagnosis of alcoholism-related EEG signals
    Acharya, U. Rajendra
    Vidya, S.
    Bhat, Shreya
    Adeli, Hojjat
    Adeli, Amir
    [J]. EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2014, 41 : 257 - 263
  • [3] AUTOMATED DIAGNOSIS OF NORMAL AND ALCOHOLIC EEG SIGNALS
    Acharya, U. Rajendra
    Sree, S. Vinitha
    Chattopadhyay, Subhagata
    Suri, Jasjit S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEURAL SYSTEMS, 2012, 22 (03)
  • [4] Synchrosqueezing-based time-frequency analysis of multivariate data
    Ahrabian, Alireza
    Looney, David
    Stankovic, Ljubisa
    Mandic, Danilo P.
    [J]. SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2015, 106 : 331 - 341
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2014, ISRN NEUROSCI
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1 INT S COMP SCI ENG
  • [7] [Anonymous], ACOUSTICS 2012
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2011, LS-SVMlab Toolbox Users Guide: Version 1.8
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2018, Classification assessment methods: a detailed tutorial, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ACI.2018.08.003
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2013, EEG Signal Processing