Tracing primary sources of funding for, and patterns of authorship in, climate change research in Africa

被引:8
作者
North, Michelle A. [1 ]
Hastie, Warwick W. [2 ]
Craig, Marlies H. [1 ]
Slotow, Rob [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Sch Life Sci, Durban, South Africa
[2] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Sch Agr Earth & Environm Sci, Discipline Geol Sci, Durban, South Africa
[3] UCL, Dept Genet Evolut & Environm, London, England
关键词
Climate change; Africa; Authorship; Funding; Knowledge-capacity disconnect; INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL; SCIENCE; ADAPTATION; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2021.10.023
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
African experts remain underrepresented in global climate change work and assessments, potentially from patterns of international funding, collaborations, or funder mandates. We evaluated authorship and funding of African climate science by searching Web of Science Core Collection for studies published between database inception and 31 October 2018, identifying 12561 journal articles reporting climate research in Africa. We exported the funding information, and ranked funders by the number of publications they funded. For the ten agencies funding the most publications with at least one African author, we identified all publications (n = 214) from the top five grants, by number of publications. We examined the number and position of African authors on these, and the mandates of these ten agencies. Of the publications on Africa climate research, 58% (7232) included no African authors. Among the top ten funders of African-authored publications, the South African NRF funded predominantly South African authors, while the United Kingdom's NERC, German BMBF, and USAID, funded research involving authors from 7 to 15 African countries. Only the IDRC and CGIAR have clear mandates to develop capacity within regions being studied. Overall, African climate experts are absent from much of the foreign-funded climate change research about Africa. Funders should promote collaboration with Africans when funding work on the continent, to improve African research capacity and expertise, and bolster African climate science. Most importantly, research done without local expertise may exclude important local knowledge, not be locally relevant or applicable, or miss African based solutions of potential global importance.
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 208
页数:13
相关论文
共 56 条
[11]  
CGIAR, 2015, CGIAR STRAT RES FRAM
[12]  
CGIAR, 2021, FUNDERS
[13]   Authorship trends in The Lancet Global Health: only the tip of the iceberg? [J].
Chaccour, Juliane .
LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2018, 6 (05) :E497-E497
[14]   Building Research Capacity in Africa: Equity and Global Health Collaborations [J].
Chu, Kathryn M. ;
Jayaraman, Sudha ;
Kyamanywa, Patrick ;
Ntakiyiruta, Georges .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2014, 11 (03)
[15]   Investigating the interplay between fundamentals of national research systems: Performance, investments and international collaborations [J].
Cimini, Giulio ;
Zaccaria, Andrea ;
Gabrielli, Andrea .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2016, 10 (01) :200-211
[16]  
Corbera E., 2006, WORKSH REP
[17]  
DFID, 2021, DFID
[18]   The Ethical Assignment of Authorship in Scientific Publications: Issues and Guidelines [J].
Feeser, V. Ramana ;
Simon, Jeremy R. .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2008, 15 (10) :963-969
[19]   Perspectives on biometeorological research on the African continent [J].
Fitchett, Jennifer M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMETEOROLOGY, 2021, 65 (02) :133-147
[20]   Climate for women in climate science: Women scientists and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [J].
Gay-Antaki, Miriam ;
Liverman, Diana .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2018, 115 (09) :2060-2065