Asymmetric impacts of individual investor sentiment on the time-varying risk-return relation in stock market

被引:14
作者
He, Zhifang [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiangnan Univ, Sch Business, Wuxi 214122, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Investor sentiment; Risk-return tradeoff; Quantile regression; MEAN-VARIANCE RELATION; EXCESS RETURNS; TRADE-OFF; VOLATILITY; ATTENTION; NEWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.iref.2021.11.018
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study investigates the impacts of investor sentiments, including individual sentiment and market-wide sentiments, on time-varying risk-return tradeoffs in the U.S. stock market using quantile regressions. Empirical results show that the individual sentiment has a significant negative effect on the time-varying risk-return tradeoff across all quantiles, indicating the heterogeneity of the individual sentiment effect. Specifically, the positive individual sentiment weakens the time-varying risk-return tradeoff while the negative individual sentiment enhances it. Besides, there are asymmetric effects of the individual sentiment at quantiles (0.25, 0.75), that is, a negative individual sentiment associated with bad news has a stronger impact than a positive individual sentiment associated with good news. These findings are robust for alternative estimate methods and individual sentiments. However, the study finds that the time-varying riskreturn tradeoff is less sensitive to the market-wide sentiment than to the individual sentiment, indicating that the individual sentiment is more useful and important in determining the stock price and variation.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 194
页数:18
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   The power of bad: The negativity bias in Australian consumer sentiment announcements on stock returns [J].
Akhtar, Shumi ;
Faff, Robert ;
Oliver, Barry ;
Subrahmanyam, Avanidhar .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2011, 35 (05) :1239-1249
[2]   Investor sentiment and the cross-section of stock returns [J].
Baker, Malcolm ;
Wurgler, Jeffrey .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2006, 61 (04) :1645-1680
[3]   Is there a risk-return trade-off? Evidence from high-frequency data [J].
Bali, Turan G. ;
Peng, Lin .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2006, 21 (08) :1169-1198
[4]   All that glitters: The effect of attention and news on the buying behavior of individual and institutional investors [J].
Barber, Brad M. ;
Odean, Terrance .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2008, 21 (02) :785-818
[5]   An examination of investor sentiment effect on G7 stock market returns [J].
Bathia, Deven ;
Bredin, Don .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2013, 19 (09) :909-937
[6]   Asymmetric volatility and risk in equity markets [J].
Bekaert, G ;
Wu, GJ .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2000, 13 (01) :1-42
[7]   From Average Joe's happiness to Miserable Jane and Cheerful John: using quantile regressions to analyze the full subjective well-being distribution [J].
Binder, Martin ;
Coad, Alex .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2011, 79 (03) :275-290
[8]   A risk-return explanation of the momentum-reversal "anomaly" [J].
Booth, G. Geoffrey ;
Fung, Hung-Gay ;
Leung, Wai Kin .
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL FINANCE, 2016, 35 :68-77
[9]   NO NEWS IS GOOD-NEWS - AN ASYMMETRIC MODEL OF CHANGING VOLATILITY IN STOCK RETURNS [J].
CAMPBELL, JY ;
HENTSCHEL, L .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1992, 31 (03) :281-318
[10]   Does investor sentiment really matter? [J].
Chau, Frankie ;
Deesomsak, Rataporn ;
Koutmos, Dimitrios .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2016, 48 :221-232