Managing the transition (ManTra): a resource for persons with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis and their health professionals: protocol for a mixed-methods study in Italy

被引:12
作者
Giovannetti, Ambra Mara [1 ,2 ]
Giordano, Andrea [2 ]
Pietrolongo, Erika [3 ]
Confalonieri, Paolo [1 ]
De Luca, Giovanna [3 ]
Tortorella, Carla [4 ]
Trojano, Maria [4 ]
Uccelli, Michele Messmer [5 ]
Clerici, Valentina Torri [1 ]
Gitto, Lara [6 ]
Kopke, Sascha [7 ]
Borreani, Claudia [8 ]
Heesen, Christoph [9 ]
Solari, Alessandra [2 ]
机构
[1] Fdn IRCCS Neurol Inst C Besta, Unit Neuroimmunol & Neuromuscular Dis, Milan, Italy
[2] Fdn IRCCS Neurol Inst C Besta, Unit Neuroepidemiol, Milan, Italy
[3] G dAnnunzio Univ Chieti Pescara, Dept Neurosci Imaging & Clin Sci, Chieti, Italy
[4] Aldo Moro Univ Bari, Dept Basic Med Sci Neurosci & Sense Organs, Bari, Italy
[5] Italian Multiple Sclerosis Soc & Res Fdn, Genoa, Italy
[6] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, CEIS Econ Evaluat & HTA, Rome, Italy
[7] Univ Lubeck, Nursing Res Unit, Inst Social Med & Epidemiol, Lubeck, Germany
[8] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Cura Tumor, Unit Clin Psychol, Milan, Italy
[9] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Neurol, Hamburg, Germany
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2017年 / 7卷 / 08期
关键词
REPORTING QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SHARED DECISION-MAKING; CONSENSUS METHODS; INFORMATION AID; UNMET NEEDS; PATIENT; CARE; COMMUNICATION; SATISFACTION; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017254
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction 15 years after clinical onset, about 50% of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis convert to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). Notwithstanding the importance of this transition, knowledge of the experiences and needs of patients and carers is fragmentary, and targeted interventions are not available. Managing the Transition to SPMS (ManTra) is a mixed methodology project to develop and test a user-led resource for newly diagnosed patients with SPMS. Here, we describe the developmental phase, consisting of a literature review and a new research study involving key stakeholders, in which we construct the resource. Methods and analysis Round 1: The literature review and study will be conducted in parallel. The latter will identify patient needs using a qualitative approach consisting of: personal semistructured interviews with > 15 recently diagnosed patients with SPMS; three focus group meetings (one with significant others of patients, one with neurologists and one with other health professionals caring for patients with SPMS). An online survey (> 200 recently diagnosed Italian patients with SPMS) will follow to verify needs in a larger independent sample. An expert panel will outline a set of candidate resources/interventions that aim to satisfy the needs thus identified. Round 2: Consensus on the final resource will be obtained in a 1-day meeting of recently diagnosed patients with SPMS, significant others, health professionals and other stakeholders, using the nominal group technique. The expert panel will refine the resource, identify the outcome measures to assess its efficacy and ascertain the most suitable comparator (ManTra Phase 2, not part of this protocol). Ethics and dissemination The study protocol was approved by the ethics committees of each of the involved centres: Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute C Besta, Milan; G D'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara and the Aldo Moro University of Bari. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at conferences and a lay summary sent to participants.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], JOINT REPORT HLTH CA
  • [2] [Anonymous], J MED INTERNET RES
  • [3] Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616
  • [4] Evidence Based Medicine and Shared Decision Making: The challenge of getting both evidence and preferences into health care
    Barratt, Alexandra
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2008, 73 (03) : 407 - 412
  • [5] Unmet Needs of People with Severe Multiple Sclerosis and Their Carers: Qualitative Findings for a Home-Based Intervention
    Borreani, Claudia
    Bianchi, Elisabetta
    Pietrolongo, Erika
    Rossi, Ilaria
    Cilia, Sabina
    Giuntoli, Miranda
    Giordano, Andrea
    Confalonieri, Paolo
    Lugaresi, Alessandra
    Patti, Francesco
    Grasso, Maria Grazia
    de Carvalho, Laura Lopes
    Palmisano, Lucia
    Zaratin, Paola
    Battaglia, Mario Alberto
    Solari, Alessandra
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (10):
  • [6] The biopsychosocial model 25 years later:: Principles, practice, and scientific inquiry
    Borrell-Carrió, F
    Suchman, AL
    Epstein, RM
    [J]. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2004, 2 (06) : 576 - 582
  • [7] Overcoming barriers in progressive multiple sclerosis research
    Coetzee, Timothy
    Zaratin, Paola
    Gleason, Trevis L.
    [J]. LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2015, 14 (02) : 132 - 133
  • [8] Can patients assess the quality of health care? Patients' surveys should ask about real experiences of medical care
    Coulter, A
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7557): : 1 - 2
  • [9] Crabtree B.F., 1992, Doing Qualitative Research
  • [10] Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance
    Craig, Peter
    Dieppe, Paul
    Macintyre, Sally
    Michie, Susan
    Nazareth, Irwin
    Petticrew, Mark
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 337 (7676): : 979 - 983