Leukocytapheresis in ulcerative colitis: Results of a multicenter double-blind prospective case-control study with sham apheresis as placebo treatment

被引:100
作者
Sawada, K
Kusugami, K
Suzuki, Y
Bamba, T
Munakata, A
Hibi, T
Shimoyama, T
机构
[1] Fujimoto Hosp Med, Dept Gastroenterol, Osaka 5830857, Japan
[2] Hyogo Med Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
[3] Nagoya Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med 1, Nagoya, Aichi 466, Japan
[4] Chiba Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med 2, Chiba 280, Japan
[5] Shiga Univ Med Sci, Dept Internal Med 2, Otsu, Shiga, Japan
[6] Hirosaki Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med 1, Hirosaki, Aomori 036, Japan
[7] Keio Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41089.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Leukocytapheresis (LCAP) is a method of therapeutic apheresis that removes peripheral leukocytes. Previous studies showed that in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), LCAP was more effective than high-dose steroid therapy, and it had few adverse effects. We investigated LCAP in a multicenter study using active and sham devices in a double-blind study in order to elucidate the placebo effect of extracorporeal treatment including anticoagulant medication. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with active UC of severe or moderately severe grade were enrolled and assigned to the active group or the sham group. Six patients were excluded from the study and 19 (10 in the active group and nine in the sham group) were evaluated. LCAP (treatment using an active device or a sham device) was performed once a week for 5 wk, followed by two additional sessions during the next 4 wk at 2-wk intervals. Steroids and other medications were continued at the same dosage for 4 wk, which included a 2-wk pre-observation period and the first 2 wk after the start of the LCAP treatment. New medications or increase in the dosage of previous medication were prohibited until evaluation was conducted. RESULTS: The clinical activity index (CAI) value of UC, indicated that the active group showed a significantly greater improvement (80%, 8/10) than the sham group (33%, 3/9; p < 0.05). Adverse effects were observed in five patients (one in the active group and four in the sham group). None of these effects was severe and none of the sessions was terminated as a consequence of the adverse effects. CONCLUSION: The results confirmed that LCAP is a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients with active UC.
引用
收藏
页码:1362 / 1369
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
ALLISON MC, 1998, INFLAMM BOWEL DIS, P91
[2]   PHARMACOLOGICAL STUDIES OF FUT-175, NAFAMSTAT MESILATE .1. INHIBITION OF PROTEASE ACTIVITY IN INVITRO AND INVIVO EXPERIMENTS [J].
AOYAMA, T ;
INO, Y ;
OZEKI, M ;
ODA, M ;
SATO, T ;
KOSHIYAMA, Y ;
SUZUKI, S ;
FUJITA, M .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1984, 35 (03) :203-227
[3]   A pilot study of centrifugal leukocyte apheresis for corticosteroid-resistant active ulcerative colitis [J].
Ayabe, T ;
Ashida, T ;
Taniguchi, M ;
Nomura, M ;
Einami, K ;
Taruishi, M ;
Saitoh, Y ;
Santos, SB ;
Ono, M ;
Shibata, Y ;
Kohgo, Y .
INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 36 (05) :322-326
[4]  
Ayabe T, 1998, Ther Apher, V2, P125, DOI 10.1111/j.1744-9987.1998.tb00089.x
[5]   TREATMENT OF CHRONIC ULCERATIVE COLITIS WITH 6-MERCAPTOPURINE [J].
BEAN, RHD .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1962, 2 (15) :592-&
[6]  
BICKS RO, 1995, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V108, P952
[7]   THE CURRENT STATUS OF LYMPHOCYTE-T APHERESIS (TLA) TREATMENT OF CROHNS-DISEASE [J].
BICKS, RO ;
GROSHART, KD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1989, 11 (02) :136-138
[8]   CURRENT SURGICAL THERAPY FOR MUCOSAL ULCERATIVE-COLITIS [J].
BINDEROW, SR ;
WEXNER, SD .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1994, 37 (06) :610-624
[9]   EARLY EXPERIENCES WITH AZATHIOPRINE IN ULCERATIVE COLITIS - A NOTE OF CAUTION [J].
BOWEN, GE ;
IRONS, GV ;
RHODES, JB ;
KIRSNER, JB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1966, 195 (06) :460-+
[10]   THE PRODUCTION OF CYTOKINES BY POLYMORPHONUCLEAR NEUTROPHILS [J].
CASSATELLA, MA .
IMMUNOLOGY TODAY, 1995, 16 (01) :21-26