Response of non-dicamba-resistant soybean (Glycine max) varieties to dicamba

被引:4
|
作者
Meyeres, Tyler [1 ]
Lancaster, Sarah [1 ]
Kumar, Vipan [2 ]
Roozeboom, Kraig [1 ]
Peterson, Dallas [1 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Dept Agron, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[2] Kansas State Univ, Agr Res Ctr, Dept Agron, Hays, KS USA
关键词
Off-target movement; injury; soybean varieties; yield components; offspring; HERBICIDES; GLYPHOSATE; INJURY; 2,4-D; EXPOSURE; RATES; DRIFT;
D O I
10.1017/wet.2021.4
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Introduction and rapid adoption of dicamba-resistant (DR) soybean led to an increase of post-emergent applications of dicamba. This resulted in a widespread increase in nontarget dicamba injury to non-DR soybean in 2017. Field studies were conducted in Manhattan, KS, in 2018 and 2019 and in Ottawa, KS, in 2019 to investigate the injury and yield response of soybean varieties with varying herbicide-resistance traits and maturity groups when exposed to dicamba. Four varieties were tested: 'Credenz 3841LL' (glufosinate resistant), 'Credenz 4748LL' (glufosinate resistant), 'Asgrow AG4135RR2Y' (glyphosate resistant), and 'Stine 40BA02' (glyphosate and isoxaflutole resistant), abbreviated as CR3841, CR4748, AG4135, and ST40B, respectively. Soybeans were treated with 5.6 g ae ha(-1) of dicamba at V3 and R1 stages. Percent soybean injury, soybean height, soybean yield and yield components, and injury to offspring were evaluated. Four weeks after treatment (WAT) at V3, the greatest injury was observed in AG4135 and ST4OB. Dicamba application at R1 resulted in the greatest injury to ST4OB both 4 WAT and at senescence. Minimal injury was observed in all varieties treated at V3 at senescence and yield loss was 5% or less. Dicamba application at R1 resulted in 19 to 34% yield loss, with the least yield loss in CR4748, and the greatest in ST4OB. Varieties with greater injury at senescence generally yielded less than other varieties.
引用
收藏
页码:718 / 724
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] RESPONSE OF SOYBEAN (GLYCINE-MAX) VARIETIES TO PLANT DENSITIES AND FERTILIZATION
    KHELKAR, PM
    JADHAO, SL
    SHINDE, VU
    MALVI, SD
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 1991, 36 (03) : 414 - 415
  • [32] Response of Glyphosate-Tolerant Soybean Yield Components to Dicamba Exposure
    Robinson, Andrew P.
    Simpson, David M.
    Johnson, William G.
    WEED SCIENCE, 2013, 61 (04) : 526 - 536
  • [33] Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean Response to Micro-Rates of Three Dicamba-Based Herbicides
    Osipitan, O. Adewale
    Scott, Jon E.
    Knezevic, Stevan Z.
    AGROSYSTEMS GEOSCIENCES & ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 2 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [34] Soybean response to dicamba in irrigation water under controlled environmental conditions
    Willett, Cammy D.
    Grantz, Erin M.
    Lee, Jung Ae
    Thompson, Matthew N.
    Norsworthy, Jason K.
    WEED SCIENCE, 2019, 67 (03) : 354 - 360
  • [35] The Addition of Dicamba to POST Applications of Quizalofop-p-ethyl or Clethodim Antagonizes Volunteer Glyphosate-Resistant Corn Control in Dicamba-Resistant Soybean
    Underwood, Matthew G.
    Soltani, Nader
    Hooker, David C.
    Robinson, Darren E.
    Vink, Joseph P.
    Swanton, Clarence J.
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 30 (03) : 639 - 647
  • [36] Evaluation of Dicamba Persistence among Various Agricultural Hose Types and Cleanout Procedures Using Soybean (Glycine max) as a Bio-Indicator
    Cundiff, Gary T.
    Reynolds, Daniel B.
    Mueller, Thomas C.
    WEED SCIENCE, 2017, 65 (02) : 305 - 316
  • [37] Soybean response to simulated dicamba/diflufenzopyr drift followed by postemergence herbicides
    Brown, Lynette R.
    Robinson, Darren E.
    Nurse, Robert E.
    Swanton, Clarence J.
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    CROP PROTECTION, 2009, 28 (06) : 539 - 542
  • [38] Phytotoxic response and yield of soybean (Glycine max) varieties treated with sulfentrazone or flumioxazin
    Taylor-Lovell, S
    Wax, LM
    Nelson, R
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 15 (01) : 95 - 102
  • [39] Response of glyphosate-resistant soybean to dicamba spray tank contamination during vegetative and reproductive growth stages
    Soltani, Nader
    Nurse, Robert E.
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2016, 96 (01) : 160 - 164
  • [40] Soybean response to dicamba and 2,4-D in simulated furrow irrigation
    Willett, Cammy
    Grantz, Erin
    Lee, Jung
    Thompson, Matthew
    Norsworthy, Jason
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 256