Response of non-dicamba-resistant soybean (Glycine max) varieties to dicamba

被引:4
|
作者
Meyeres, Tyler [1 ]
Lancaster, Sarah [1 ]
Kumar, Vipan [2 ]
Roozeboom, Kraig [1 ]
Peterson, Dallas [1 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Dept Agron, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[2] Kansas State Univ, Agr Res Ctr, Dept Agron, Hays, KS USA
关键词
Off-target movement; injury; soybean varieties; yield components; offspring; HERBICIDES; GLYPHOSATE; INJURY; 2,4-D; EXPOSURE; RATES; DRIFT;
D O I
10.1017/wet.2021.4
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Introduction and rapid adoption of dicamba-resistant (DR) soybean led to an increase of post-emergent applications of dicamba. This resulted in a widespread increase in nontarget dicamba injury to non-DR soybean in 2017. Field studies were conducted in Manhattan, KS, in 2018 and 2019 and in Ottawa, KS, in 2019 to investigate the injury and yield response of soybean varieties with varying herbicide-resistance traits and maturity groups when exposed to dicamba. Four varieties were tested: 'Credenz 3841LL' (glufosinate resistant), 'Credenz 4748LL' (glufosinate resistant), 'Asgrow AG4135RR2Y' (glyphosate resistant), and 'Stine 40BA02' (glyphosate and isoxaflutole resistant), abbreviated as CR3841, CR4748, AG4135, and ST40B, respectively. Soybeans were treated with 5.6 g ae ha(-1) of dicamba at V3 and R1 stages. Percent soybean injury, soybean height, soybean yield and yield components, and injury to offspring were evaluated. Four weeks after treatment (WAT) at V3, the greatest injury was observed in AG4135 and ST4OB. Dicamba application at R1 resulted in the greatest injury to ST4OB both 4 WAT and at senescence. Minimal injury was observed in all varieties treated at V3 at senescence and yield loss was 5% or less. Dicamba application at R1 resulted in 19 to 34% yield loss, with the least yield loss in CR4748, and the greatest in ST4OB. Varieties with greater injury at senescence generally yielded less than other varieties.
引用
收藏
页码:718 / 724
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Non-dicamba-resistant soybean response to multiple dicamba applications
    Meyeres, Tyler
    Lancaster, Sarah
    Kumar, Vipan
    Roozeboom, Kraig
    Peterson, Dallas
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2023, 115 (01) : 147 - 160
  • [2] Response of Non-Dicamba-Resistant Soybean to Dicamba As Influenced by Growth Stage and Herbicide Rate
    McCown, Spencer
    Barber, Tom
    Norsworthy, Jason K.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 32 (05) : 513 - 519
  • [3] Soybean (Glycine max) response to simulated drift from selected sulfonylurea herbicides, dicamba, glyphosate, and glufosinate
    Al-Khatib, K
    Peterson, D
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 13 (02) : 264 - 270
  • [4] Dicamba residues in sprayers: Phytotoxicity on non-dicamba tolerant soybean
    Marques, Matheus G.
    da Cunha, Joao Paulo A. R.
    Alves, Guilherme S.
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA E AMBIENTAL, 2021, 25 (08): : 573 - 579
  • [5] Glyphosate-Resistant Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) and Waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) Management in Dicamba-Resistant Soybean (Glycine max)
    Spaunhorst, Douglas J.
    Siefert-Higgins, Simone
    Bradley, Kevin W.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 28 (01) : 131 - 141
  • [6] Weed Control in Dicamba-Resistant Soybean with Glyphosate/Dicamba Applied at Various Doses and Timings
    Soltani, Nader
    Shropshire, Christy
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2020, 2020
  • [7] Soybean Response to Dicamba: A Meta-Analysis
    Kniss, Andrew R.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 32 (05) : 507 - 512
  • [8] Changes in Soybean Yield Components in Response to Dicamba
    Foster, Matthew R.
    Griffin, James L.
    AGROSYSTEMS GEOSCIENCES & ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 2 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [9] TOLERANCE OF SOYBEAN (GLYCINE-MAX) AND SUNFLOWER (HELIANTHUS-ANNUUS) TO FALL-APPLIED DICAMBA
    MAGNUSSON, MU
    WYSE, DL
    WEED SCIENCE, 1987, 35 (06) : 846 - 852
  • [10] Soybean response to dicamba exposure in furrow irrigation
    Grantz, Erin
    Lee, Jung Ae
    Willett, Cammy
    Norsworthy, Jason K.
    AGROSYSTEMS GEOSCIENCES & ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 3 (01)