A Meta-Analysis of How Country-Level Factors Affect Web Survey Response Rates

被引:35
作者
Daikeler, Jessica [1 ]
Silber, Henning [1 ]
Bosnjak, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] GESIS Leibniz Inst Social Sci, Mannheim, Germany
[2] Leibniz Inst Psychol Informat, Trier, Germany
关键词
response rates; cross-national; cross-cultural; web surveys; meta-analysis; RANDOM-EFFECTS MODELS; NONRESPONSE RATES; MAIL SURVEY; DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS; ONLINE PANELS; INTERNET; PAPER; BIAS; TELEPHONE; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1177/14707853211050916
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A major challenge in web-based cross-cultural data collection is varying response rates, which can result in low data quality and non-response bias. Country-specific factors such as the political and demographic, economic, and technological factors as well as the socio-cultural environment may have an effect on the response rates to web surveys. This study evaluates web survey response rates using meta-analytical methods based on 110 experimental studies from seven countries. Three dependent variables, so-called effect sizes, are used: the web response rate, the response rate to the comparison survey mode, and the difference between the two response rates. The meta-analysis indicates that four country-specific factors (political and demographic, economic, technological, and socio-cultural) impact the magnitude of web survey response rates. Specifically, web surveys achieve high response rates in countries with high population growth, high internet coverage, and a high survey participation propensity. On the other hand, web surveys are at a disadvantage in countries with a high population age and high cell phone coverage. This study concludes that web surveys can be a reliable alternative to other survey modes due to their consistent response rates and are expected to be used more frequently in national and international settings.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 333
页数:28
相关论文
共 151 条
[1]   USING MOTIVATIONAL STATEMENTS IN WEB-INSTRUMENT DESIGN TO REDUCE ITEM-MISSING RATES IN A MIXED-MODE CONTEXT [J].
Al Baghal, Tarek ;
Lynn, Peter .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2015, 79 (02) :568-579
[2]  
Al-Subaihi A.A., 2008, The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, V6, P123
[3]  
Allum N., 2014, UNDERSTANDING SOC WO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Gross domestic Product (GDP)
[5]   Evidence-based practice in psychology [J].
Goodheart C.D. ;
Levant R.F. ;
Barlow D.H. ;
Carter J. ;
Davidson K.W. ;
Hagglund K.J. ;
Hollon S.D. ;
Johnson J.D. ;
Leviton L.C. ;
Mahrer A.R. ;
Newman F.L. ;
Norcross J.C. ;
Silverman D.K. ;
Smedley B.D. ;
Wampold B.E. ;
Westen D.I. ;
Yates B.T. ;
Zane N.W. ;
Reed G.M. ;
Bufka L.F. ;
Nelson P.D. ;
Belar C.D. ;
Bullock M. .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2006, 61 (04) :271-285
[6]  
Atrostic B.K., 2001, J OFF STAT, V17, P209
[7]  
Barbier S., 2015, INT WORKSH HOUS SURV, p02
[8]  
Bason J. J., 2000, AM ASS PUBL OP RES P
[9]  
Bates N., 2001, AM ASS PUBL OP RES 5
[10]   Response styles in marketing research: A cross-national investigation [J].
Baumgartner, H ;
Steenkamp, JBEM .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2001, 38 (02) :143-156