Outpatient Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Are Patients Ready for Same-Day Discharge?

被引:31
作者
Dobbs, Ryan W. [1 ]
Thanh-Tuan Nguyen [1 ]
Shahait, Mohammed [1 ]
Lee, Daniel J. [1 ]
Kim, Jessica L. [1 ]
El-Fahmawi, Ayah [1 ]
Lee, David, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
outpatients; ambulatory care; prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; health care surveys; patient preference; robotics; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1089/end.2019.0796
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Several case series have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of outpatient robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in well-selected patients; however, the patient perspective of this practice has not been well explored. In this study, we explored patients' perspectives on the potential barriers and benefits of outpatient RARP. Materials and Methods: We developed a multidimensional questionnaire to assess socioeconomic status, presence of caretaker at home, preferred transportation to the emergency room in case of chest pain or postsurgical complications, readiness for discharge at postanesthesia care unit (PACU), and potential barriers for discharge. In addition, patients were asked to provide an estimate of overnight hospitalization costs and their willingness to pay out-of-pocket expenses for their overnight stay. Patients who underwent RARP between August 1, 2018, and April 30, 2019, were asked to fill the questionnaire within the first week following their operation. Results: During our study, 157/292 (53.8%) of men undergoing RARP from a single high-volume robotic surgeon completed the survey. Patients who completed <80% of the survey (n = 5) were excluded from the final analysis. Thirty-seven (24.3%) patients felt that they would have been ready for discharge immediately from PACU, and 48 (31.6%) patients after extended recovery and before midnight. Only 17.8% (n = 27) of the patients claim that they experienced a medical intervention in the hospital that could not have been managed at home. The main barriers for same-day discharge were pain (55.9%, 80/143), catheter discomfort (44.7%, 64/143), insufficient education about catheter care (31.4%, 45/143), postoperative nausea and vomiting (15.3%, 22/143), and medical complications (13.2%, 19/143). Conclusions: Two-thirds of patients following RARP did not feel ready to be discharged on the day of their surgery. Further research is necessary to identify patients who may benefit from this approach to reduce health care costs while minimizing patient postoperative morbidity.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 455
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Technical advances in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Turpen, Ryan
    Atalah, Hany
    Su, Li-Ming
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2009, 1 (05) : 251 - 258
  • [42] Is a cystogram necessary after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?
    Guru, Khurshid A.
    Seereiter, Phillip J.
    Sfakianos, John P.
    Hutson, Alan D.
    Mohler, James L.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2007, 25 (06) : 465 - 467
  • [43] Climacturia after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Parra Lopez, Maria Loreto
    Lozano Blasco, Jose Maria
    Osman Garcia, Ignacio
    Congregado Ruiz, Belen
    Conde Sanchez, Jose Manuel
    Medina Lopez, Rafael Antonio
    REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE ANDROLOGIA, 2021, 19 (01): : 49 - 52
  • [44] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Brazil: preliminary results
    Colombo Junior, Jose Roberto
    Andreoni, Cassio
    Lemos, Gustavo Caserta
    da Fonseca Filho, Limirio Leal
    Di Pietro, Daniel Luiz
    Pinto, Wilson
    Sardenberg, Camila
    Campos, Alexandre Houlthausen
    Teixeira, Jose Carlos
    Aranha Camargo, Luis Fernando
    Neto, Miguel Cendoroglo
    EINSTEIN-SAO PAULO, 2009, 7 (04): : 488 - 493
  • [45] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: advances since 2005
    Su, Li-Ming
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2010, 20 (02) : 130 - 135
  • [46] ANESTHESIA FOR ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY - A CHALLENGE FOR ANAESTHESIOLOGIST
    Kocman, Iva Bacak
    Mihaljevic, Slobodan
    Goluza, Eleonora
    Berakovic, Andrea Persin
    Piljek, Natasa Margaretic
    Kulis, Tomislav
    Hudolin, Tvrtko
    Knezevic, Nikola
    Kastelan, Zeljko
    ACTA CLINICA CROATICA, 2022, 61 : 76 - 80
  • [47] Extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a high-volume surgical center experience
    Scarcia, Marcello
    Zazzara, Michele
    Divenuto, Lucia
    Cardo, Giuseppe
    Portoghese, Filippo
    Romano, Michele
    Ludovico, Giuseppe M.
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2018, 70 (05) : 479 - 485
  • [48] Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques
    Krambeck, Amy E.
    DiMarco, David S.
    Rangel, Laureano J.
    Bergstralh, Eric J.
    Myers, Robert P.
    Blute, Michael L.
    Gettman, Matthew T.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 103 (04) : 448 - 453
  • [49] ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTATECTOMY: SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
    Rocco, B.
    Coelho, R. F.
    Albo, G.
    Patel, V. R.
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2010, 62 (03) : 295 - 304
  • [50] Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Four cases
    Lee, Yong Scong
    Han, Woong Kyu
    Oh, Young Taik
    Choi, Young Deuk
    Yang, Seung Choul
    Rha, Koon Ho
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 48 (02) : 341 - 346