Outpatient Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Are Patients Ready for Same-Day Discharge?

被引:31
作者
Dobbs, Ryan W. [1 ]
Thanh-Tuan Nguyen [1 ]
Shahait, Mohammed [1 ]
Lee, Daniel J. [1 ]
Kim, Jessica L. [1 ]
El-Fahmawi, Ayah [1 ]
Lee, David, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
outpatients; ambulatory care; prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; health care surveys; patient preference; robotics; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1089/end.2019.0796
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Several case series have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of outpatient robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in well-selected patients; however, the patient perspective of this practice has not been well explored. In this study, we explored patients' perspectives on the potential barriers and benefits of outpatient RARP. Materials and Methods: We developed a multidimensional questionnaire to assess socioeconomic status, presence of caretaker at home, preferred transportation to the emergency room in case of chest pain or postsurgical complications, readiness for discharge at postanesthesia care unit (PACU), and potential barriers for discharge. In addition, patients were asked to provide an estimate of overnight hospitalization costs and their willingness to pay out-of-pocket expenses for their overnight stay. Patients who underwent RARP between August 1, 2018, and April 30, 2019, were asked to fill the questionnaire within the first week following their operation. Results: During our study, 157/292 (53.8%) of men undergoing RARP from a single high-volume robotic surgeon completed the survey. Patients who completed <80% of the survey (n = 5) were excluded from the final analysis. Thirty-seven (24.3%) patients felt that they would have been ready for discharge immediately from PACU, and 48 (31.6%) patients after extended recovery and before midnight. Only 17.8% (n = 27) of the patients claim that they experienced a medical intervention in the hospital that could not have been managed at home. The main barriers for same-day discharge were pain (55.9%, 80/143), catheter discomfort (44.7%, 64/143), insufficient education about catheter care (31.4%, 45/143), postoperative nausea and vomiting (15.3%, 22/143), and medical complications (13.2%, 19/143). Conclusions: Two-thirds of patients following RARP did not feel ready to be discharged on the day of their surgery. Further research is necessary to identify patients who may benefit from this approach to reduce health care costs while minimizing patient postoperative morbidity.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 455
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Predischarge Predictors of Readmissions and Postdischarge Complications in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Xia, Leilei
    Taylor, Benjamin L.
    Pulido, Jose E.
    Mucksavage, Phillip
    Lee, David I.
    Guzzo, Thomas J.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2017, 31 (09) : 864 - 871
  • [22] Comparison of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Open Radical Prostatectomy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Seo, Hyun-Ju
    Lee, Na Rae
    Son, Soo Kyung
    Kim, Dae Keun
    Rha, Koon Ho
    Lee, Seon Heui
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 57 (05) : 1165 - 1177
  • [23] Overcoming the challenges of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    M A Goldstraw
    B J Challacombe
    K Patil
    P Amoroso
    P Dasgupta
    R S Kirby
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2012, 15 : 1 - 7
  • [24] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is a safe procedure
    Thomsen, Frederik Birkebaek
    Berg, Kasper Drimer
    Hvarness, Helle
    Nielsen, Jon
    Iversen, Peter
    DANISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 60 (09):
  • [25] Same Day Discharge after Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
    Abaza, Ronney
    Martinez, Oscar
    Ferroni, Matthew C.
    Bsatee, Aya
    Gerhard, Robert S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 202 (05) : 961 - 965
  • [26] Measuring Quality of Life Following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Hale, Graham R.
    Shahait, Mohammed
    Lee, David, I
    Lee, Daniel J.
    Dobbs, Ryan W.
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2021, 15 : 1373 - 1382
  • [27] Extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial experience
    Dogra, Prem Nath
    Saini, Ashish Kumar
    Singh, Prabhjot
    Bora, Girdhar
    Nayak, Brusabhanu
    UROLOGY ANNALS, 2014, 6 (02) : 130 - 134
  • [28] Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy utilization in hospitals offering robotics
    Yanamadala, Swati
    Chung, Benjamin I.
    Hernandez-Boussard, Tina M.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 23 (03) : 8280 - 8285
  • [29] Management of erectile dysfunction following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review
    Marchioni, Michele
    De Francesco, Piergustavo
    Castellucci, Roberto
    Papalia, Rocco
    Sarikaya, Selcuk
    Gomez Rivas, Juan
    Schips, Luigi
    Scarpa, Roberto M.
    Esperto, Francesco
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2020, 72 (05) : 543 - 554
  • [30] Hospital Volume, Utilization, Costs and Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Yu, Hua-yin
    Hevelone, Nathanael D.
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Kowalczyk, Keith J.
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Hu, Jim C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (05) : 1632 - 1637