Mechanobiology of mandibular distraction osteogenesis: finite element analyses with a rat model

被引:46
作者
Loboa, EG
Fang, TD
Parker, DW
Warren, SM
Fong, KD
Longaker, MT
Carter, DR
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Engn Mech, Biomech Engn Div, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
mechanobiology; mandibular distraction osteogenesis; finite element analysis; computed tomography; mesenchymal tissue differentiation;
D O I
10.1016/j.orthres.2004.09.010
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Three-dimensional finite element (FE) analyses were performed to characterize the local mechanical environment created within the tissue regenerate during mandibular distraction osteogenesis (DO) in a rat model. Finite element models were created from three-dimensional computed tomography image data of rat hemi-mandibles at four different time points during an optimal distraction osteogenesis protocol (i.e., most successful protocol for bone formation): end latency (post-operative day (POD) 5), distraction day 2 (POD 7), distraction day 5 (POD 10), and distraction day 8 (POD 13). A 0.25 mm distraction was simulated and the resulting hydrostatic stresses and maximum principal tensile strains were determined within the tissue regenerate. When compared to previous histological findings, finite element analyses showed that tensile strains up to 13% corresponded to regions of new bone formation and regions of periosteal hydrostatic pressure with magnitudes less than 17 kPa corresponded to locations of cartilage formation. Tensile strains within the center of the gap were much higher, leading us to conclude that tissue damage would occur there if the tissue was not compliant enough to withstand such high strains, and that this damage would trigger formation of new mesenchymal tissue. These data were consistent with histological evidence showing mesenchymal tissue present in the center of the gap throughout distraction. Finite element analyses performed at different time points during distraction were instrumental in determining the changes in hydrostatic stress and tensile strain fields throughout distraction, providing a mechanical environment rationale for the different levels of bone formation in end latency, and distraction day 2, 5, and 8 specimens. (c) 2004 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 670
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] ANISOTROPIC ANALYSIS OF STRAIN ROSETTE INFORMATION FROM CORTICAL BONE
    CARTER, DR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1978, 11 (04) : 199 - 202
  • [2] Carter DR, 1998, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, pS41
  • [3] CARTER DR, 2001, SKELETAL FUNCTION FO, P161
  • [4] Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing
    Claes, LE
    Heigele, CA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1999, 32 (03) : 255 - 266
  • [5] Computer planning for distraction osteogenesis
    Gateño, J
    Teichgraeber, JF
    Aguilar, E
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 105 (03) : 873 - 882
  • [6] Gateno J, 2000, J ORAL MAXIL SURG, V58, P985, DOI 10.1053/joms.2000.8740
  • [7] A longitudinal three-dimensional evaluation of the growth pattern in hemifacial microsomia treated by mandibular distraction osteogenesis: A preliminary report
    Kusnoto, B
    Figueroa, AA
    Polley, JW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 1999, 10 (06) : 480 - 486
  • [8] Mechanobiology of initial pseudarthrosis formation with oblique fractures
    Loboa, EG
    Beaupré, GS
    Carter, DR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2001, 19 (06) : 1067 - 1072
  • [9] Mechanobiology of mandibular distraction osteogenesis: experimental analyses with a rat model
    Loboa, EG
    Fang, TD
    Warren, SM
    Lindsey, DP
    Fong, KD
    Longaker, MT
    Carter, DR
    [J]. BONE, 2004, 34 (02) : 336 - 343
  • [10] Rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis: Latency, rate, and rhythm determine the adaptive response
    Paccione, MF
    Mehrara, BJ
    Warren, SM
    Greenwald, JA
    Spector, JA
    Luchs, JS
    Longaker, MT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2001, 12 (02) : 175 - 182