Efficacy and Safety of Guardcel Nasal Packing After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Prospective, Single Blind, Randomized Controlled Study

被引:11
作者
Kang, Byungjin [1 ]
Kim, Jeong-Rok [1 ]
Shin, Jae-Min [1 ]
Park, Ii-Ho [1 ]
Lee, Heung-Man [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Coll Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Korea Univ, Coll Med, Div Brain Korea Program Biomed Sci 21, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Korea Univ, Guro Hosp, In Vitro Diagnost Med Devices Support Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Nasal Packing; Absorbable Packing; Hemostasis; Adhesion; Endoscopic Sinus Surgery; COMFORT;
D O I
10.21053/ceo.2016.01081
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objectives. Nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery is frequently used to control postoperative bleeding, enhance the wound healing process, and prevent lateralization of the middle turbinate, which causes insufficient ventilation. Many biodegradable materials have been developed to reduce pain and mucosal damage during packing removal. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of Guardcel (Genewel Co.) middle meatal packing with a traditional nonabsorbable middle meatal packing, Merocel (Medtronic Xomed), on wound healing and patient satisfaction. Methods. In this prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled study, we enrolled 32 consecutive patients (64 nostrils) undergoing bilateral endoscopic sinus surgery at Korea University Guro Hospital from February 2015 to August 2015. Guardcel and Merocel were inserted postoperatively into a randomly assigned side. Objective findings about bleeding, hemostasis, adhesion, and infection were evaluated with nasal endoscopy. Patients' symptoms including pain and nasal obstruction were evaluated with a visual analog scale. Each evaluation was done at 2-3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks after surgery. Results. At 2-3 days after endoscopic sinus surgery, the Guardcel side had a significantly less hemostasis time than the Merocel side (P =0.001). During this period, the pain during packing removal was significantly lower on the Guardcel-inserted side than the Merocel-inserted side (P=0.002). At two weeks after surgery, the adhesion score on the Guardcel side was significantly lower than that of the Merocel side (P=0.011). Other parameters during the study follow-up periods were not statistically significant. There were no severe adverse reactions. Conclusion. Guardcel, a newly developed packing material, appeared to shorten the hemostasis time and reduce pain sensation at 2-3 days after surgery; it also prevented adhesion formation 2 weeks after surgery when compared with the control. Guardcel can be an effective and safe candidate to replace conventional packing materials after endoscopic sinus surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:248 / 253
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Adult chronic rhinosinusitis: Definitions, diagnosis, epidemiology, and pathophysiology
    Benninger, MS
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2003, 129 (03) : S1 - S32
  • [2] Endoscopic outcomes of resorbable nasal packing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled study
    Berlucchi, Marco
    Castelnuovo, Paolo
    Vincenzi, Andrea
    Morra, Bruno
    Pasquini, Ernesto
    [J]. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2009, 266 (06) : 839 - 845
  • [3] Endoscopic sinus surgery: evolution and technical innovations
    Govindaraj, S.
    Adappa, N. D.
    Kennedy, D. W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2010, 124 (03) : 242 - 250
  • [4] Effect of carboxymethylcellulose nasal packing on wound healing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery
    Kastl, Konrad G.
    Betz, Christian S.
    Siedek, Vanessa
    Leunig, Andreas
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2009, 23 (01) : 80 - 84
  • [5] Prevalence and risk factors of chronic rhinosinusitis in Korea
    Kim, Yoo Suk
    Kim, Na Hyun
    Seong, Sang Yeob
    Kim, Kyung Rok
    Lee, Gi-Bong
    Kim, Kyung-Su
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2011, 25 (03) : E117 - E121
  • [6] Leunig A, 2009, RHINOLOGY, V47, P36
  • [7] No packing versus packing after endoscopic sinus surgery: Pursuit of patients' comfort after surgery
    Mo, Ji-Hun
    Han, Doo Hee
    Shin, Hyun-Woo
    Cha, Wonjae
    Chang, Mun-young
    Jin, Hong-Ryul
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY, 2008, 22 (05): : 525 - 528
  • [8] Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial Evaluating Patient Satisfaction, Bleeding, and Wound Healing Using Biodegradable Synthetic Polyurethane Foam (NasoPore) as a Middle Meatal Spacer in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
    Shoman, Nael
    Gheriani, Heitham
    Flamer, David
    Javer, Amin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2009, 38 (01): : 112 - 118
  • [9] Valentine Rowan, 2009, Otolaryngol Clin North Am, V42, P813, DOI 10.1016/j.otc.2009.07.009
  • [10] A prospective single-blind randomized controlled study of use of hyaluronic acid nasal packs in patients after endoscopic sinus surgery
    Wormald, PJ
    Boustred, RN
    Le, T
    Hawke, L
    Sacks, R
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY, 2006, 20 (01): : 7 - 10