Prospective assessment of interobserver agreement for endoanal MRI in fecal incontinence
被引:16
作者:
Malouf, AJ
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:St Marks Hosp, Intestinal Imaging Ctr, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
Malouf, AJ
Halligan, S
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:St Marks Hosp, Intestinal Imaging Ctr, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
Halligan, S
Williams, AB
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:St Marks Hosp, Intestinal Imaging Ctr, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
Williams, AB
Bartram, CI
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:St Marks Hosp, Intestinal Imaging Ctr, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
Bartram, CI
Dhillon, S
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:St Marks Hosp, Intestinal Imaging Ctr, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
Dhillon, S
Kamm, MA
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:St Marks Hosp, Intestinal Imaging Ctr, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
Kamm, MA
机构:
[1] St Marks Hosp, Intestinal Imaging Ctr, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
[2] St Marks Hosp, Physiol Unit, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
来源:
ABDOMINAL IMAGING
|
2001年
/
26卷
/
01期
关键词:
anus;
MRI;
abnormalities;
magnetic resonance;
intracavitary coils;
D O I:
10.1007/s002610000100
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: Endoanal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is a new technique for the assessment of anal sphincter integrity in fecal incontinence and an alternative to anal endosonography. The present study aimed to determine interobserver variation for assessment of anal sphincter integrity using endoanal MR imaging. Methods: Fifty-two consecutive anally incontinent patients underwent MR imaging by using a purpose-built endoanal receiver coil and static 1.0-T magnet. T2-weighted axial, coronal, and sagittal scans were independently assessed by two radiologists who noted external and internal sphincter integrity. Findings were compared and agreement was assessed with the kappa statistic. Results: There was disagreement in 18 of 49 technically adequate studies (37%; kappa = 0.46), indicating "moderate" agreement. Agreement was strongest if the sphincters were either both intact or both disrupted. Observers agreed in only one diagnosis of an isolated internal sphincter defect and in no diagnosis of an isolated external sphincter defect. Conclusion: The overall interobserver agreement for assessment of sphincter integrity using endoanal MR imaging is "moderate." Interobserver agreement using endoanal MR imaging is less than that reported for anal endosonography.