Bilinguals Use Language-Specific Articulatory Settings

被引:26
|
作者
Wilson, Ian [1 ]
Gick, Bryan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aizu, Ctr Language Res, Aizu Wakamatsu, Fukushima, Japan
[2] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[3] Haskins Labs Inc, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH | 2014年 / 57卷 / 02期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
articulatory setting; bilingualism; French; English; interspeech posture (ISP); ultrasound; optical tracking; PRONUNCIATION; POSITION; ENGLISH;
D O I
10.1044/2013_JSLHR-S-12-0345
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: Previous work has shown that monolingual French and English speakers use distinct articulatory settings, the underlying articulatory posture of a language. In the present article, the authors report on an experiment in which they investigated articulatory settings in bilingual speakers. The authors first tested the hypothesis that in order to sound native-like, bilinguals must use distinct, language-specific articulatory settings in monolingual mode. The authors then tested the hypothesis that in bilingual mode, a bilingual individual's articulatory setting is identical to the monolingual-mode setting of 1 of his or her languages. Method: Eight French-English bilinguals each read 90 English and 90 French sentences, and the authors measured their interspeech posture (ISP) using optical tracking of the lips and jaw and ultrasound imaging of the tongue. Results: Results show that bilingual speakers who are perceived as native in both languages exhibit distinct, language-specific ISPs, and those who are not perceived as native in one or more languages do not. In bilingual mode, bilinguals use an ISP that is equivalent to the monolingual-mode ISP of their currently most used language. The most balanced bilingual used a French lip ISP but an English tongue-tip ISP. Conclusion: Results support the claim that bilinguals who sound native in each of their languages have distinct articulatory settings for each language.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 373
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bilingualism yields language-specific plasticity in left hemisphere's circuitry for learning to read in young children
    Jasinska, K. K.
    Berens, M. S.
    Kovelman, I.
    Petitto, L. A.
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2017, 98 : 34 - 45
  • [32] The Source-Goal asymmetry in spatial language: language-general vs. language-specific aspects
    Johanson, Megan
    Selimis, Stathis
    Papafragou, Anna
    LANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 34 (07) : 826 - 840
  • [33] How Language Is Embodied in Bilinguals and Children with Specific Language Impairment
    Adams, Ashley M.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 7
  • [34] Language-specific and individual variation in anticipatory nasal coarticulation: A comparative study of American English, French, and German
    Pouplier, Marianne
    Rodriquez, Francesco
    Lo, Justin J. H.
    Alderton, Roy
    Evans, Bronwen G.
    Reinisch, Eva
    Carignan, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF PHONETICS, 2024, 107
  • [35] The Interaction of Language-Specific and Universal Factors During the Acquisition of Morphophonemic Alternations With Exceptions
    Baer-Henney, Dinah
    Kuegler, Frank
    van de Vijver, Ruben
    COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2015, 39 (07) : 1537 - 1569
  • [36] Invariant principles of speech motor control that are not language-specific
    Chakraborty, Rahul
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2012, 14 (06) : 520 - 528
  • [37] Understanding poor comprehenders in different orthographies: Universal versus language-specific skills
    Tong, Xiuli
    Deacon, S. Helene
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN READING, 2017, 40 (02) : 119 - 124
  • [38] Vowel bias in Danish word-learning: processing biases are language-specific
    Hojen, Anders
    Nazzi, Thierry
    DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2016, 19 (01) : 41 - 49
  • [39] Language-Independent and Language-Specific Aspects of Early Literacy: An Evaluation of the Common Underlying Proficiency Model
    Goodrich, J. Marc
    Lonigan, Christopher J.
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 109 (06) : 782 - 793