Energy flow and life cycle impact assessment of coffee-pepper production systems: An evaluation of conventional, integrated and organic farms in India

被引:31
作者
Basavalingaiah, K. [1 ]
Paramesh, Venkatesh [2 ]
Parajuli, Ranjan [3 ]
Girisha, H. C. [4 ]
Shivaprasad, M. [5 ]
Vidyashree, G. V. [1 ]
Thoma, Greg [3 ]
Hanumanthappa, M. [6 ]
Yogesh, G. S. [4 ]
Misra, Shiva Dhar [7 ]
Bhat, Shripad [2 ]
Irfan, M. M. [6 ]
Rajanna, G. A. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Agr & Hort Sci, EEU Madikeri, Dept Agron, Shivamogga, Karnataka, India
[2] ICAR Cent Coastal Agr Res Inst, Old Goa 403402, Goa, India
[3] Univ Arkansas, Ralph E Martin Dept Chem Engn, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[4] Univ Agr Sci, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
[5] Univ Agr & Hort Sci, ZAHRS Mudigere, Res, Shivamogga, Karnataka, India
[6] Univ Agr & Hort Sci, Shivamogga, Karnataka, India
[7] ICAR Indian Agr Res Inst, New Delhi 110012, India
关键词
Energy effi ciency; Environmental impact assessment; Global warming potential; Life cycle inventory; Mineral resource scarcity; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; CROP PRODUCTION; APPLE PRODUCTION; SUSTAINABILITY; EFFICIENCY; FOOD; MANAGEMENT; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106687
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the process of analyzing and taking action toward a low-carbon production, understanding the effect kind of farm management options is critical. Currently, a sustainable production system entails effective energy use with reduced environmental impact. Considering the quantum of inputs in coffee production, this study deals with the evaluation of energy flow and environmental footprints of coffee-pepper farms of Karnataka, India. The aim is to ensure the socio-economic and environmental sustainability of coffee-pepper production systems. The evaluation was made for 108 farms, categorized into conventional farming (CF), integrated production (IP), and organic farming (OF) systems, using both data envelopment analysis (DEA) and Life cycle Assessment (LCA) methodologies. A cradle-to-gate perspective was used to evaluate the life cycle environmental impacts. The functional unit is one ha of the cropping system, used for producing both crops (coffee and pepper). The energy analysis revealed higher energy use efficiency (2.3), net energy gain (18,890 MJ/ha), and farm autonomy (0.3) in the OF system. Higher energy consumption in CF and IP was attributed to the N fertilizer use (38% & 32%, respectively), followed by lime (20% & 17%, respectively). The DEA indicated that the average technical efficiency of the farming system was 0.82 for the CF and 0.76 for the IP. This implies farmers can save 18 and 24% of the resources in the CF and the IP systems, respectively. These farms performed more efficiently with a mean economic saving of 497 and 540 USD, respectively compared to the CF. The on-farm greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were the major contributor to the global warming potential; contributing 59%, 62%, and 62%, respectively in the CF, IP, and OF. The overall GHG emissions in the OF systems were 65% lower compared to the CF. The IP and OF systems showed better environmental and energy gains compared to the CF for most of the selected sustainability metrics. Hence, large-scale adoption of the OF practices or reducing the use of external inputs can help to achieve higher energy efficiency and to reduce environmental impacts associated with conventional farming systems.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [71] Sustainability of three apple production systems
    Reganold, JP
    Glover, JD
    Andrews, PK
    Hinman, HR
    [J]. NATURE, 2001, 410 (6831) : 926 - 930
  • [72] Shaded Coffee and Cocoa - Double Dividend for Biodiversity and Small-scale Farmers
    Rosalien, Jezeer E.
    Pita, Verweij A.
    Maria, Santos J.
    Rene, Boot G. A.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 140 : 136 - 145
  • [73] Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Coffee at the Vegetative Stage as Influenced by Fertilizer Application Method
    Salamanca-Jimenez, Alveiro
    Doane, Timothy A.
    Horwath, William R.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2017, 8
  • [74] Shade trees have higher impact on soil nutrient availability and food web in organic than conventional coffee agroforestry
    Sauvadet, Marie
    Van den Meersche, Karel
    Allinne, Clementine
    Gay, Frederic
    Virginio Filho, Elias de Melo
    Chauvat, Matthieu
    Becquer, Thierry
    Tixier, Philippe
    Harmand, Jean-Michel
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 649 : 1065 - 1074
  • [75] SEGURA MILENA A, 2012, Luna Azul, P60
  • [76] Singh S, 1992, Energy in production agriculture
  • [77] Shade effect on coffee production at the northern Tzeltal zone of the state of Chiapas, Mexico
    Soto-Pinto, L
    Perfecto, I
    Castillo-Hernandez, J
    Caballero-Nieto, J
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 80 (1-2) : 61 - 69
  • [78] Eco-efficiency evaluation of a smart window prototype
    Syrrakou, E
    Papaefthimiou, S
    Yianoulis, P
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 359 (1-3) : 267 - 282
  • [79] Carbon and water footprint of coffee consumed in Finland-life cycle assessment
    Usva, Kirsi
    Sinkko, Taija
    Silvenius, Frans
    Riipi, Inkeri
    Heusala, Hannele
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (10) : 1976 - 1990
  • [80] Carbon footprints and carbon stocks reveal climate-friendly coffee production
    van Rikxoort, Henk
    Schroth, Gotz
    Laederach, Peter
    Rodriguez-Sanchez, Beatriz
    [J]. AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 34 (04) : 887 - 897