Methods for uncertainty propagation in life cycle assessment

被引:105
作者
Groen, E. A. [1 ]
Heijungs, R. [2 ,3 ]
Bokkers, E. A. M. [1 ]
de Boer, I. J. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Anim Prod Syst Grp, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Inst Environm Sci, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Econometr & Operat Res, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Latin hypercube sampling; Quasi Monte Carlo sampling; Fuzzy interval arithmetic; Analytical uncertainty propagation; Fisheries; DECISION-MAKING; MODEL; LCA; INPUT; SIMULATION; OUTPUT;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.10.006
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Life cycle assessment (LCA) calculates the environmental impact of a product over its entire life cycle. Uncertainty analysis is an important aspect in LCA, and is usually performed using Monte Carlo sampling. In this study, Monte Carlo sampling, Latin hypercube sampling, quasi Monte Carlo sampling, analytical uncertainty propagation and fuzzy interval arithmetic were compared based on e.g. convergence rate and output statistics. Each method was tested on three LCA case studies, which differed in size and behaviour. Uncertainty propagation in LCA using a sampling method leads to more (directly) usable information compared to fuzzy interval arithmetic or analytical uncertainty propagation. Latin hypercube and quasi Monte Carlo sampling provide more accuracy in determining the sample mean than Monte Carlo sampling and can even converge faster than Monte Carlo sampling for some of the case studies discussed in this paper. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:316 / 325
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条