The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic review

被引:273
作者
Duncan, Edward A. S. [1 ]
Murray, Jennifer [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stirling, NMAHP Res Unit, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
关键词
Allied health professional; Routine outcome measurement; Outcome measurement; Facilitators; Barriers; Occupational therapy; Physical therapy; Physiotherapy; Speech and language therapy; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PHYSIOTHERAPY MANAGEMENT; ATTITUDES; STAFF;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6963-12-96
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Allied Health Professionals today are required, more than ever before, to demonstrate their impact. However, despite at least 20 years of expectation, many services fail to deliver routine outcome measurement in practice. This systematic review investigates what helps and hinders routine outcome measurement of allied health professionals practice. Methods: A systematic review protocol was developed comprising: a defined search strategy for PsycINFO, MEDLINE and CINHAL databases and inclusion criteria and systematic procedures for data extraction and quality appraisal. Studies were included if they were published in English and investigated facilitators and/or barriers to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals. No restrictions were placed on publication type, design, country, or year of publication. Reference lists of included publications were searched to identify additional papers. Descriptive methods were used to synthesise the findings. Results: 960 papers were retrieved; 15 met the inclusion criteria. Professional groups represented were Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy, and Speech and Language Therapy. The included literature varied in quality and design. Facilitators and barriers to routine outcome measurement exist at individual, managerial and organisational levels. Key factors affecting professionals' use of routine outcome measurement include: professionals' level of knowledge and confidence about using outcome measures, and the degree of organisational and peer-support professionals received with a view to promoting their work in practice. Conclusions: Whilst the importance of routinely measuring outcomes within the allied health professions is well recognised, it has largely failed to be delivered in practice. Factors that influence clinicians' ability and desire to undertake routine outcome measurement are bi-directional: they can act as either facilitators or barriers. Routine outcome measurement may only be deliverable if appropriate action is taken at individual therapist, team, and organisational levels of an organisation.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Monitoring the change: Current trends in outcome measure usage in physiotherapy
    Abrams, D
    Davidson, M
    Harrick, J
    Harcourt, P
    Zylinski, M
    Clancy, J
    [J]. MANUAL THERAPY, 2006, 11 (01) : 46 - 53
  • [2] [Anonymous], OUTCOME MEASUREMENT
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2000, The NHS Plan: a plan for investment, a plan for reform
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2009, Systematic reviews: CRD's guidancefor undertaking reviews in health care
  • [5] Improvements to the Ethical Review Process are Good News for Psychologists and Health Researchers in Europe, especially in the UK
    Barry, John
    [J]. EUROPES JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 8 (01): : 1 - 7
  • [6] Belazi Dea, 2002, Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, V2, P109, DOI 10.1586/14737167.2.2.109
  • [7] Blenkiron E.L., 2005, British Journal of Occupational Therapy, V68, P148, DOI DOI 10.1177/030802260506800402
  • [8] Braun V., 2006, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • [9] Chesson R., 1996, PHYSIOTHERAPY, V82, P673, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)66375-4
  • [10] Feasibility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for routine use
    Colquhoun, Heather
    Letts, Lori
    Law, Mary
    MacDermid, Joy
    Edwards, Mary
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2010, 73 (02) : 48 - 54