Response to Patrick Love's "Informal Theory": A Rejoinder

被引:5
作者
Evans, Nancy J. [1 ]
Guido, Florence M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Educ Leadership & Policy Studies, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Univ No Colorado, Greeley, CO 80639 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1353/csd.2012.0022
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This rejoinder to Patrick Love's article, "Informal Theory: The Ignored Link in Theory-to-Practice," which appears earlier in this issue of the Journal of College Student Development, was written at the invitation of the Editor. In the critique, we point out the weaknesses of many of Love's arguments and propositions. We provide an alternative point of view regarding application of theory in practice and encourage further discourse on the definition and role of informal theory in student affairs practice.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 200
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], STUDENT AFFAIRS J RE
[2]  
[Anonymous], LINKING THEORY PRACT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral science
[4]  
[Anonymous], STUDENT SERVICES HDB
[5]  
[Anonymous], EVOLVING THEORETICAL
[6]   THEORIES OF ACTION THAT INHIBIT INDIVIDUAL LEARNING [J].
ARGYRIS, C .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1976, 31 (09) :638-654
[7]  
Argyris C., 1974, Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness
[8]  
Chickering A.W., 1993, Education and identity
[9]  
Chickering A.W., 1969, ED IDENTITY
[10]  
Evans N.J., 1998, STUDENT DEV COLL