Epistemic analyticity: A defense

被引：34

作者：

Boghossian, PA ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] NYU, New York, NY USA

来源：

FIFTY YEARS OF QUINE'S TWO DOGMAS | 2003年 / 66卷

关键词：

D O I：

10.1163/18756735-90000810

中图分类号：

B [哲学、宗教];

学科分类号：

01 ; 0101 ;

摘要：

The paper is a defense of the project of explaining the a priori via the notion of meaning or concept possession. It responds to certain objections that have been made to this project-in particular, that there can be no epistemically analytic sentences that are not also metaphysically analytic, and that the notion of implicit definition cannot explain a priori entitlement. The paper goes on to distinguish between two different ways in which facts about meaning might generate facts about entitlement-inferential and constitutive. It concludes by outlining a theory of the latter.

引用

页码：15 / 35

页数：21

共 16 条

[1]

[Anonymous], REALITY REPRESENTATI

[2] How are objective epistemic reasons possible? [J].