Robot-Assisted Upper Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery: Implementation Using a Stepwise Approach and Analyses of the First 100 Surgical Procedures

被引:4
作者
Thomaschewski, Michael [1 ]
Zimmermann, Markus [1 ]
Mueller-Debus, Charlotte Friederieke [1 ]
Windisch, Viola [1 ]
Wellner, Ulrich Friedrich [1 ]
Hummel, Richard [1 ]
Keck, Tobias [1 ]
Bausch, Dirk [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Schleswig Holstein, Klin Chirurg, Campus Lubeck,Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lubeck, Germany
来源
ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE | 2020年 / 145卷 / 03期
关键词
Da Vinci (R) Xi surgical system; minimally invasive upper GI surgery; implementation; minimally invasive pancreatic surgery; robotic surgery; MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY; TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; LEARNING-CURVE; GASTRIC-CANCER; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; VALIDITY; OUTCOMES; VOLUME; CHOLECYSTECTOMY;
D O I
10.1055/a-1135-9277
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Robot-assisted surgery is a promising technique for overcoming the limitations of laparoscopic surgery, especially for complex and advanced surgical procedures. We now describe the implementation of our robotic upper GI and HPB surgery program in our centre of excellence for minimally invasive surgery and the results of our first 100 surgical procedures. Method Robot-assisted surgery was performed using the Da Vinci (R) Xi Surgical SystemT. Robot-assisted surgical procedures were performed by two surgeons specialising in minimally invasive surgery. Our robotic surgery program for upper GI and HPB surgery was established in three steps. Step 1: firstly, relatively easy surgical procedures were performed robotically, including cholecystectomies, minor gastric resections and fundoplications. Step 2: secondly, pancreatic left sided resections, adrenalectomies and small liver resection were performed, as procedures with moderate degree of difficulty. Step 3: finally, advanced and highly complex procedures were performed, including right hemihepatectomy, complex pancreatic resections, total gastrectomies and oesophagectomies. Data collected from July 2017 till October 2018 were analysed retrospectively with regard to conversion rate, morbidity (Clavien Dindo > 2) and 90-d-mortality. Results The first step of establishing our robotic surgical program included 26 procedures. Here, conversion rate, morbidity and mortality were 0%. In the second step of implementation, 23 procedures were performed. Conversion rate, morbidity and mortality were 28, 8 and 0% respectively. The last step included 51 advanced and highly complex procedures. These procedures had a morbidity of 41%, a mortality of 4% and a conversion rate of 43%. Conclusion Our stepwise approach enables safe implementation of a robotic surgical program for upper GI and HPB surgery with comparable morbidity and mortality even for highly complex procedures. However, highly complex procedures in the learning curve required a high conversion rate.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 245
页数:12
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: Initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy [J].
Ahlering, TE ;
Skarecky, D ;
Lee, D ;
Clayman, RV .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (05) :1738-1741
[2]   The Miami International Evidence-based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection [J].
Asbun, Horacio J. ;
Moekotte, Alma L. ;
Vissers, Frederique L. ;
Kunzler, Filipe ;
Cipriani, Federica ;
Alseidi, Adnan ;
D'Angelica, Michael I. ;
Balduzzi, Alberto ;
Bassi, Claudio ;
Bjornsson, Bergthor ;
Boggi, Ugo ;
Callery, Mark P. ;
Del Chiaro, Marco ;
Coimbra, Felipe J. ;
Conrad, Claudius ;
Cook, Andrew ;
Coppola, Alessandro ;
Dervenis, Christos ;
Dokmak, Safi ;
Edil, Barish H. ;
Edwin, Bjorn ;
Giulianotti, Pier C. ;
Han, Ho-Seong ;
Hansen, Paul D. ;
van der Heijde, Nicky ;
van Hilst, Jony ;
Hester, Caitlin A. ;
Hogg, Melissa E. ;
Jarufe, Nicolas ;
Jeyarajah, D. Rohan ;
Keck, Tobias ;
Kim, Song Cheol ;
Khatkov, Igor E. ;
Kokudo, Norihiro ;
Kooby, David A. ;
Korrel, Maarten ;
de Leon, Francisco J. ;
Lluis, Nuria ;
Lof, Sanne ;
Machado, Marcel A. ;
Demartines, Nicolas ;
Martinie, John B. ;
Merchant, Nipun B. ;
Molenaar, I. Quintus ;
Moravek, Cassadie ;
Mou, Yi-Ping ;
Nakamura, Masafumi ;
Nealon, William H. ;
Palanivelu, Chinnusamy ;
Pessaux, Patrick .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2020, 271 (01) :1-14
[3]   A Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer [J].
Bonjer, H. Jaap ;
Deijen, Charlotte L. ;
Abis, Gabor A. ;
Cuesta, Miguel A. ;
van der Pas, Martijn H. G. M. ;
de lange-de Klerk, Elly S. M. ;
Lacy, Antonio M. ;
Bemelman, Willem A. ;
Andersson, John ;
Angenete, Eva ;
Rosenberg, Jacob ;
Fuerst, Alois ;
Haglind, Eva .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 372 (14) :1324-1332
[4]   Assessment of Quality Outcomes for Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Identification of the Learning Curve [J].
Boone, Brian A. ;
Zenati, Mazen ;
Hogg, Melissa E. ;
Steve, Jennifer ;
Moser, Arthur James ;
Bartlett, David L. ;
Zeh, Herbert J. ;
Zureikat, Amer H. .
JAMA SURGERY, 2015, 150 (05) :416-422
[5]   Time to cusum: Simplified reporting of outcomes in colorectal surgery [J].
Bowles, Thomas A. ;
Watters, David A. .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 77 (07) :587-591
[6]   Robotic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy for advanced proximal gastric cancer: A feasible and simplified procedure [J].
Chen, Qi-Yue ;
Zhong, Qing ;
Zheng, Chao-Hui ;
Huang, Chang-Ming .
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2019, 28 :67-68
[7]   A comprehensive review of robotic surgery curriculum and training for residents, fellows, and postgraduate surgical education [J].
Chen, Richard ;
Armijo, Priscila Rodrigues ;
Krause, Crystal ;
Siu, Ka-Chun ;
Oleynikov, Dmitry .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (01) :361-367
[8]   Perioperative and Long-term Oncological Results of Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy as Hybrid Technique - A Matched Pair Analysis of 120 Cases [J].
Deichmann, Steffen ;
Bolm, Louisa Romina ;
Honselmann, Kim Christin ;
Wellner, Ulrich Friedrich ;
Lapshyn, Hryhoriy ;
Keck, Tobias ;
Bausch, Dirk .
ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2018, 143 (02) :155-161
[9]   Comparison of short-term outcomes between minimally invasive McKeown and Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal or junctional cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Deng, Jianqing ;
Su, Qingqing ;
Ren, Zhipeng ;
Wen, Jiaxin ;
Xue, Zhiqiang ;
Zhang, Lianbin ;
Chu, Xiangyang .
ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2018, 11 :6057-6069
[10]   Long-term oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic versus open rectal cancer resection: a high-quality population-based analysis in a Southern German district [J].
Draeger, Teresa ;
Voelkel, Vinzenz ;
Gerken, Michael ;
Klinkhammer-Schalke, Monika ;
Fuerst, Alois .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (10) :4096-4104