A Quality-of-Life Scale for Assistive Technology: Results of a Pilot Study of Aging and Technology

被引:32
作者
Agree, Emily M. [1 ]
Freedman, Vicki A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Hopkins Ctr Populat Aging & Hlth, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Inst Social Res, Ann Arbor, MI USA
来源
PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2011年 / 91卷 / 12期
关键词
PERSONAL CARE; DEVICE OUTCOMES; DISABILITY; REHABILITATION; TRIAL; USERS;
D O I
10.2522/ptj.20100375
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. In an aging society, it is increasingly important to understand how assistive devices can be used by older people to maintain quality of life despite chronic disabilities. Assistive technology is a mainstay of physical therapist practice, but the potential for device use to affect psychosocial well-being is not yet understood at the population level. Objective. The objective of this study was to develop a parsimonious indicator that can be used in population-based surveys to represent the effect of assistive technologies on quality of life for older people, separate from personal assistance. Design. This study was a cross-sectional survey. Methods. The methods used in this study were psychometric scale development and structural equation modeling. Results. The results indicated that a parsimonious, valid, and reliable scale reflecting quality of life related to assistive device use can be created from 3 questions designed to measure improvements in safety, control, and participation due to technology. The findings also suggested that assistive technology may more effectively improve quality of life for people with greater levels of functional limitations. Limitations. The data were derived from a cross-sectional survey conducted by telephone. The use of personal assistance, on average, was low; thus, the applicability to a population with more profound care needs has yet to be confirmed. Conclusions. Determining the broader impact of assistive technology on quality of life with population-level measures may provide insight into how best to leverage technologies to prevent dependence in aging adults.
引用
收藏
页码:1780 / 1788
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] The influence of personal care and assistive devices on the measurement of disability
    Agree, EM
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 48 (04) : 427 - 443
  • [2] Reconsidering substitution in long-term care: When does assistive technology take the place of personal care?
    Agree, EM
    Freedman, VA
    Cornman, JC
    Wolf, DA
    Marcotte, JE
    [J]. JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2005, 60 (05): : S272 - S280
  • [3] A comparison of assistive technology and personal care in alleviating disability and unmet need
    Agree, EM
    Freedman, VA
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 2003, 43 (03) : 335 - 344
  • [4] Health-related quality of life outcomes measures
    Andresen, EM
    Meyers, AR
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2000, 81 (12): : S30 - S45
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2001, BRIT J OCCUP THER
  • [6] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION OF THE WHEELCHAIR OUTCOME MEASURE FOR MIDDLE-AGED AND OLDER USERS OF POWER MOBILITY DEVICES
    Auger, Claudine
    Demers, Louise
    Gelinas, Isabelle
    Routhier, Francois
    Ben Mortenson, W.
    Miller, William C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2010, 42 (06) : 574 - 581
  • [7] Brandt A., 2006, TECHNOL DISABIL, V17, P205
  • [8] Mobility-related participation and user satisfaction: Construct validity in the context of powered wheelchair use
    Brandt, Ase
    Kreiner, Svend
    Iwarsson, Susanne
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 5 (05) : 305 - 313
  • [9] USERS RESPONSES TO ASSISTIVE DEVICES FOR PHYSICAL-DISABILITY
    BROOKS, NA
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1991, 32 (12) : 1417 - 1424
  • [10] Measurement of assistive device use: Implications for estimates of device use and disability in late life
    Cornman, JC
    Freedman, VA
    Agree, EM
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 2005, 45 (03) : 347 - 358