Organic technology in the Pastoral Neolithic: osseous and eggshell artefacts from Luxmanda, Tanzania

被引:9
作者
Langley, Michelle C. [1 ]
Prendergast, Mary E. [2 ]
Grillo, Katherine M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Australian Res Ctr Human Evolut, Environm Futures Res Inst, Nathan, Qld, Australia
[2] Harvard Univ, Radcliffe Inst Adv Study, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Archaeol & Anthropol, La Crosse, WI 54601 USA
关键词
Bone technology; Worked bone; Ivory; OES; Ornamentation; Projectile technology; Pastoralism; East Africa; LATER STONE-AGE; LIMPOPO CONFLUENCE AREA; BONE TECHNOLOGY; NORTHERN CAPE; EAST-AFRICA; MIDDLE; SHELTER; SITES; MACROFRACTURE; PLATEAU;
D O I
10.1007/s12520-017-0528-z
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
Hard animal materials were key components of prehistoric daily life, with many such raw materials shaped into diverse tool types and personal ornaments. With few exceptions, outside of the far south and north of Africa, osseous artefacts have been largely understudied on the continent, with this situation particularly applying to pastoralist contexts. Well-documented worked bone, ivory, or ostrich eggshell (OES) assemblages tend to be associated with hunter-gatherers and are generally interpreted with reference to contemporary hunter-gatherer toolkits. Study of osseous and OES technologies used by ancient or modern pastoralist populations, on the other hand, remains in its infancy. In this paper, we present an analysis of 14 worked bone, ivory, and OES artefacts from the Pastoral Neolithic site of Luxmanda located in north-central Tanzania. We apply technological trace analysis to understand histories of manufacture, use, and discard and compare our findings against the corpus of osseous and eggshell technologies recovered from terminal Pleistocene through Holocene sites of eastern Africa, providing a synthesis of this region for the first time. Finally, we explore the limited record for comparable technologies in recent pastoralist communities and argue that forager/food producer distinctions based on organic technologies are neither present nor meaningful based on current evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 126 条
[11]  
Blackburn R., 1973, AZANIA, V8, P55, DOI [10.1080/00672707309511572, DOI 10.1080/00672707309511572]
[12]  
Bleek D.F., 1928, The Naron: A Bushman Tribe of the Central Kalahari
[13]  
Bower J.R. F., 1977, AZANIA, V12, P119, DOI [DOI 10.1080/00672707709511251, 10.1080/00672707709511251]
[14]  
Bradfield J., 2016, Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures (consulted 16 January 2020), DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-3934-5_8476-2, 10.1007/978-94-007-3934-5_8476-2]
[15]  
Bradfield J., Journal of Anthropological and Archaeological Science. DO!, DOI DOI 10.1007/S12520-013-0136-5
[16]   Macrofractures on bone-tipped arrows: analysis of hunter-gatherer arrows in the Fourie collection from Namibia [J].
Bradfield, Justin .
ANTIQUITY, 2012, 86 (334) :1179-1191
[17]  
Bradfield J, 2012, S AFR ARCHAEOL BULL, V67, P32
[18]  
Bradfield J, 2011, S AFR ARCHAEOL BULL, V66, P67
[19]  
Bradfield J, 2009, S AFR ARCHAEOL BULL, V64, P176
[20]   Experimental series and use-wear in bone tools [J].
Buc, Natacha .
JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 38 (03) :546-557