Effect of education and safety equipment on poisoning-prevention practices and poisoning: systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression

被引:32
作者
Kendrick, D. [1 ]
Smith, S. [1 ]
Sutton, A. [2 ]
Watson, M. [3 ]
Coupland, C. [1 ]
Mulvaney, C. [4 ]
Mason-Jones, A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Div Primary Care, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Univ Leicester, Dept Hlth Sci, Leicester, Leics, England
[3] Univ Nottingham, Sch Nursing, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[4] Hucknall Hlth Ctr, Broxtowe & Hucknall Primary Care Trust, Nottingham, England
[5] Western Cape Dept Hlth, Cape Town, South Africa
关键词
D O I
10.1136/adc.2007.133686
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess (a) the effect of home safety education and the provision of safety equipment on poison-prevention practices and poisoning rates, and (b) whether the effect of interventions differs by social group. Data sources: Medline, Embase, Cinahl, ASSIA, Psychinfo, Web of Science, plus other electronic sources and hand searching of conference abstracts and reference lists. Authors of included studies were asked to supply individual participant data. Review methods: Randomised controlled trials, non-randomised controlled trials and controlled before-and-after studies, with participants aged (19 years, providing home safety education with or without free or subsidised safety equipment and reporting poison-prevention practices or poisoning incidents were included. Pooled odds ratios and pooled rate ratios were estimated, and meta-regression estimated intervention effects by child age, gender and social variables. Results: Home safety interventions increased safe storage of medicines (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.02) and cleaning products (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.17), the possession of syrup of ipecac (OR 3.34, 95% CI 1.50 to 7.41), and having poison control centre numbers accessible (OR 3.67, 95% CI 1.84 to 7.33). There was a lack of evidence on poisoning rates (rate ratio 1.03, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.36) and no consistent evidence that intervention effects differed by child age, gender or social group. Conclusions: Home safety education and the provision of safety equipment improve poison-prevention practices, but the impact on poisoning rates is unclear. Such interventions are unlikely to widen inequalities in childhood poisoning-prevention practices.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 608
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, CHILDR PLAN BUILD BR
[2]   Unsafe storage of poisons in homes with toddlers [J].
Beirens, TMJ ;
van Beeck, EF ;
Dekker, R ;
Brug, J ;
Raat, H .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2006, 38 (04) :772-776
[3]   Home syrup of ipecac use does not reduce emergency department use or improve outcome [J].
Bond, GR .
PEDIATRICS, 2003, 112 (05) :1061-1064
[4]  
Bull MJ, 2003, PEDIATRICS, V112, P1182
[5]   A randomised controlled trial of general practitioner safety advice for families with children under 5 years [J].
Clamp, M ;
Kendrick, D .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7144) :1576-1579
[6]  
*DEP TRAD IND, 2003, 24 FIN REP HOM LEIS
[7]   Individual-level injury prevention strategies in the clinical setting [J].
DiGuiseppi, C ;
Roberts, IG .
FUTURE OF CHILDREN, 2000, 10 (01) :53-82
[8]   A nonparametric "trim and fill" method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis [J].
Duval, S ;
Tweedie, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 95 (449) :89-98
[9]  
FERGUSSON DM, 1982, PEDIATRICS, V69, P515
[10]  
FIEVESON A, CALCULATING POWER SI