Codesign and development of a primary school based pathway for child anxiety screening and intervention delivery: a protocol, mixed-methods feasibility study

被引:12
|
作者
Williamson, Victoria [1 ,2 ]
Larkin, Michael [3 ]
Reardon, Tessa [1 ]
Pearcey, Samantha [1 ]
Hill, Claire [4 ]
Stallard, Paul [5 ]
Spence, Susan H. [6 ]
Breen, Maria [4 ]
Macdonald, Ian [7 ]
Ukoumunne, Obioha [8 ]
Ford, Tamsin [9 ]
Violato, Mara [10 ]
Sniehotta, Falko [11 ]
Stainer, Jason [12 ]
Gray, Alastair [10 ]
Brown, Paul [13 ]
Sancho, Michelle [14 ]
Creswell, Cathy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Expt Psychol, Anna Watts Bldg, Oxford, Oxon, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, London, England
[3] Aston Univ, Aston Neurosci Inst, Dept Psychol, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[4] Univ Reading, Sch Psychol & Clin Language Sci, Reading, Berks, England
[5] Univ Bath, Bath, Avon, England
[6] Griffith Univ, 16 Russell St South Bank, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[7] Charlie Waller Mem Trust, Rear Off, First Floor, Thatcham, England
[8] Univ Exeter, NIHR ARC South West Peninsula, Exeter, Devon, England
[9] Univ Cambridge, Dept Psychiat, Cambridge, England
[10] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Populat Hlth, Richard Doll Bldg,Old Rd Campus, Oxford, England
[11] Newcastle Univ, Fac Med Sci, Populat Hlth Sci Inst, Baddiley Clark Bldg,Richardson Rd, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[12] Stanley Primary Sch, Strathmore Rd, London, England
[13] Bransgore C E Primary Sch, Ringwood Rd, Christchurch, New Zealand
[14] West Berkshire Council, Council Off, Market St, Newbury, Berks, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 04期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
anxiety disorders; protocols & guidelines; mental health; child & adolescent psychiatry; qualitative research; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; DISORDERS; PROGRAM; PREDICTORS; OUTCOMES; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044852
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Anxiety difficulties are among the most common mental health problems in childhood. Despite this, few children access evidence-based interventions, and school may be an ideal setting to improve children's access to treatment. This article describes the design, methods and expected data collection of the Identifying Child Anxiety Through Schools - Identification to Intervention (iCATS i2i) study, which aims to develop acceptable school-based procedures to identify and support child anxiety difficulties. Methods and analysis iCATS i2i will use a mixed-methods approach to codesign and deliver a set of procedures-or 'pathway'-to improve access to evidence-based intervention for child anxiety difficulties through primary schools in England. The study will consist of four stages, initially involving in-depth interviews with parents, children, school staff and stakeholders (stage 1) to inform the development of the pathway. The pathway will then be administered in two primary schools, including screening, feedback to parents and the offer of treatment where indicated (stage 2), with participating children, parents and school staff invited to provide feedback on their experience (stages 3 and 4). Data will be analysed using Template Analysis. Ethics and dissemination The iCATS i2i study was approved by the University of Oxford's Research Ethics Committee (REF R64620/RE001). It is expected that this codesign study will lead on to a future feasibility study and, if indicated, a randomised controlled trial. The findings will be disseminated in several ways, including via lay summary report, publication in academic journals and presentation at conferences. By providing information on child, parent, school staff and other stakeholder's experiences, we anticipate that the findings will inform the development of an acceptable evidence-based pathway for identification and intervention for children with anxiety difficulties in primary schools and may also inform broader approaches to screening for and treating youth mental health problems outside of clinics.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] School-based screening for childhood anxiety problems and intervention delivery: a codesign approach
    Williamson, Victoria
    Larkin, Michael
    Reardon, Tessa
    Pearcey, Samantha
    Button, Roberta
    Green, Iheoma
    Hill, Claire
    Stallard, Paul
    Spence, Susan H.
    Breen, Maria
    Mcdonald, Ian
    Ukoumunne, Obioha
    Ford, Tamsin
    Violato, Mara
    Sniehotta, Falko
    Stainer, Jason
    Gray, Alastair
    Brown, Paul
    Sancho, Michelle
    Morgan, Fran
    Jasper, Bec
    Creswell, Cathy
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [2] Evaluation of a novel, multicomponent anxiety management programme for people with intellectual disability: protocol for a mixed-methods, quasi-experimental feasibility study
    Acton, Daniel
    Williams, Jonathan
    Woodrow, Ceri
    Talbot, Grace
    Jones, Steven
    Lane, Steven
    Jaydeokar, Sujeet
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (09):
  • [3] Safeguarding adolescent mental health in India (SAMA): study protocol for codesign and feasibility study of a school systems intervention targeting adolescent anxiety and depression in India
    Hugh-Jones, Siobhan
    Janardhana, N.
    Al-Janabi, Hareth
    Bhola, Poornima
    Cooke, Paul
    Fazel, Mina
    Hudson, Kristian
    Khandeparkar, Prachi
    Mirzoev, Tolib
    Venkataraman, Surendran
    West, Robert M.
    Mallikarjun, Pavan
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [4] Let It Out (LIO) study: protocol for a mixed-methods study to optimise the design and assess the feasibility of an online emotional disclosure-based intervention in UK hospices
    McInnerney, Daisy
    Candy, Bridget
    Stone, Patrick
    Kupeli, Nuriye
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (05):
  • [5] Applying an osteopathic intervention to improve mild to moderate mental health symptoms: a mixed-methods feasibility study protocol
    Hope-Bell, Josh
    Draper-Rodi, Jerry
    Edwards, Darren J.
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (06):
  • [6] Mixed-methods feasibility study on the cultural adaptation of a child abuse prevention model
    Beasley, Lana O.
    Silovsky, Jane F.
    Owora, Arthur
    Burris, Lorena
    Hecht, Debra
    DeMoraes-Huffine, Patty
    Cruz, Ivelisse
    Tolma, Eleni
    CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 2014, 38 (09) : 1496 - 1507
  • [7] Protocol for the process evaluation for a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating primary school-based screening and intervention delivery for childhood anxiety problems
    Williamson, Victoria
    Larkin, Michael
    Reardon, Tessa
    Stallard, Paul
    Spence, Susan H.
    Macdonald, Ian
    Ukoumunne, Obioha C.
    Ford, Tamsin
    Violato, Mara
    Sniehotta, Falko F.
    Stainer, Jason
    Gray, Alastair
    Brown, Paul
    Sancho, Michelle
    Morgan, Fran
    Jasper, Bec
    Taylor, Lucy
    Creswell, Cathy
    BMJ OPEN, 2025, 15 (02):
  • [8] The Brief Intervention for School Clinicians (BRISC): A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Feasibility, Acceptability, and Contextual Appropriateness
    Lyon, Aaron R.
    Bruns, Eric J.
    Ludwig, Kristy
    Stoep, Ann Vander
    Pullmann, Michael D.
    Dorsey, Shannon
    Eaton, John
    Hendrix, Ethan
    McCauley, Elizabeth
    SCHOOL MENTAL HEALTH, 2015, 7 (04) : 273 - 286
  • [9] Systematic development of quality indicators for skin cancer management in primary care: a mixed-methods study protocol
    Laginha, Bela Ines
    Rapport, Frances
    Smith, Andrea
    Wilkinson, David
    Cust, Anne E.
    Braithwaite, Jeffrey
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [10] Use and impact of social prescribing: a mixed-methods feasibility study protocol
    Jani, Anant
    Liyanage, Harshana
    Hoang, Uy
    Moore, Lucy
    Ferreira, Filipa
    Yonova, Ivelina
    Tzortziou Brown, Victoria
    de Lusignan, Simon
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (09):