Is digital subtraction angiography still the method of choice for diagnosis and follow-up of cervical artery dissection?

被引:2
|
作者
Roncallo, F
Turtulici, I
Arena, E
Colucci, M
Gasparetto, B
Bartolini, A
机构
[1] Dipartimento Sci Neurol, Genoa, Italy
[2] CNR, Ctr Studio Neurofisiol Cerebrale, Genoa, Italy
[3] Univ Genoa, Genoa, Italy
[4] Azienda Osped San Martino, Serv Radiol 2, Genoa, Italy
来源
RIVISTA DI NEURORADIOLOGIA | 1998年 / 11卷 / 06期
关键词
cervical arteries; dissection; digital subtractive angiography; ultrasounds; magnetic resonance; helical computed tomographic angiography;
D O I
10.1177/197140099801100606
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Cervical Artery Dissection (CAD) accounts for up to one fifth of ischaemic strokes occurring before 45 years. The internal carotid artery is the most commonly affected vessel. Cerebral ischemia is the most serious consequence of carotid artery dissection. The enlargement of the artery may lead to laterocervical pain and direct compression of the lower cranial nerves and/or sympathetic pericarotid plexus. A spontaneous dissection is assumed when no or only minor trauma preceded the onset. The pathogenesis of dissections remains unknown in most cases, but traumas and primary diseases of the arterial wall are the main predisposing factors. We monitored six patients with CAD (four males, two females; 32-67 years old). All patients underwent US and CT-CTA examinations; five patients had DSA; four patients underwent MRI-MRA within the first two weeks after clinical onset, Four patients have received intravenous heparin treatment followed by oral anticoagulant therapy. Patients were then followed up with US alone (3 patients) or combined with CTA (3 patients) at 3 months to 2 years. Three patients demonstrated a completed stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory (two patients) and in the posterior inferior cerebellar artery territory (one patient). Five patients had headache and/or cervicofacial pain. One had only neck and brachial pain. Four patients showed a Horner's syndrome alone (two patients) or associated with 9th, 10th, 11th and 12th cranial nerve involvement (one patient) or associated with stroke (one patient). One patient had brachial plexus motor impairment. Four patients had ICA dissection; one patient had VA dissection; one patient had multiple neck vessel dissection, that were correctly demonstrated by CTA and DSA in all cases. In five cases US overestimated the stenosis, showing a false occlusion pattern, MRI-MRA well displayedmural haematoma in the subacute stage, ipsilateral reduced intracranial blood flow and brain damage. CADs are treated by heparin at the acute stage, although the benefit of such a potenially dangerous treatment has never been proven by a randomized trial. The favorable natural history of CAD emphasizes the need for a non-invasive approach to detection, monitoring and follow-up. A combined morphological and functional analysis of the brain and neck arteries is mandatory. Consequently DSA may be now replaced by US, MRI-MRA and CT-CTA. Because the three sets of CTA images correctly depict arterial wall and lumen without flow artifacts, this technique may be considered the new gold standard for the assessment of CAD.
引用
收藏
页码:823 / 840
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Craniocervical artery dissection: diagnosis and follow-up with MR imaging and MR angiography
    Gelal, FM
    Kitis, O
    Calli, C
    Yunten, N
    Vidinli, BD
    Uygur, M
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2004, 10 (10): : MT109 - MT116
  • [2] FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS WITH HISTORY OF CERVICAL ARTERY DISSECTION
    LEYS, D
    MOULIN, T
    STOJKOVIC, T
    BEGEY, S
    CHAVOT, D
    LAMY, O
    PETYT, L
    MOUNIERVEHIER, F
    RONDEPIERRE, P
    GODEFROY, O
    LUCAS, C
    HENON, H
    GUEROUAOU, D
    MARCHAU, M
    JANSSENS, E
    PETIT, H
    JOSIEN, E
    PASQUIER, F
    KASSIOTIS, P
    WAROT, P
    DESTEE, A
    CHOPARD, JL
    CREPINLEBLOND, T
    LANNUZEL, A
    DESTUYNDER, C
    RUMBACH, L
    PRUVO, JP
    LECLERC, X
    CLARISSE, J
    ARES, GS
    CATTIN, F
    PIOTIN, M
    BONNEVILLE, JF
    LEJEUNE, JP
    CHRISTIAENS, JL
    ADNETBONTE, C
    VERIER, A
    CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 1995, 5 (01) : 43 - 49
  • [3] DIAGNOSIS AND FOLLOW-UP OF SMALL HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA WITH SELECTIVE INTRAARTERIAL DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY
    IKEDA, K
    SAITOH, S
    KOIDA, I
    TSUBOTA, A
    ARASE, Y
    CHAYAMA, K
    KUMADA, H
    HEPATOLOGY, 1993, 17 (06) : 1003 - 1007
  • [4] Multislice computed tomographic angiography versus digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of nitinol stents in the superficial femoral artery
    Willoteaux, Serge
    Moranne, Olivier
    Duda, Stephan H.
    Lions, Christophe
    Gaxotte, Virginia
    Durand, Francois
    Negawi, Ziad
    Beregi, Jean-Paul
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2006, 13 (05) : 609 - 615
  • [5] Neurosonographical follow-up in patients with spontaneous cervical artery dissection
    Sengelhoff, Christian
    Nebelsieck, Jonas
    Nassenstein, Isabelle
    Maintz, David
    Nabavi, Darius G.
    Kuhlenbaeumer, Gregor
    Ringelstein, Erich B.
    Dittrich, Ralf
    NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2008, 30 (07) : 687 - 689
  • [6] CONTRIBUTION OF MR-ANGIOGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS AND FOLLOW-UP OF AORTIC DISSECTION
    BOGAERT, JG
    BOSMANS, H
    VERSCHAKELEN, JA
    MARCHAL, GJ
    BAERT, AL
    RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 : 522 - 522
  • [8] Imaging in the diagnosis and follow-up evaluation of vertebral artery dissection
    Lu, CJ
    Sun, Y
    Jeng, JS
    Huang, KM
    Hwang, BS
    Lin, WH
    Chen, RC
    Yip, PK
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2000, 19 (04) : 263 - 270
  • [9] PRIMARY DIAGNOSIS AND FOLLOW-UP OF ACUTE PULMONARY EMBOLI - COMPARISON BETWEEN DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY AND SPIRAL CT
    STEINER, P
    PHILLIPS, F
    WESNER, D
    LUND, GK
    KREYMANN, G
    NICOLAS, V
    CRONEMUNZEBROCK, W
    FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIETE DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER NEUEN BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1994, 161 (04): : 285 - 291
  • [10] CONTRIBUTION OF INTRAVENOUS DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY TO THE DIAGNOSIS OF AORTIC DISSECTION
    BRENOT, P
    PERNES, JM
    ANGEL, C
    SEUROT, M
    HALLALI, P
    GAUX, JC
    ANNALES DE RADIOLOGIE, 1984, 27 (01) : 5 - 14