The FDCPA takes a new direction: Federal review of state court litigation practices

被引：0

作者：

Menkes, Bruce N. ^{[1
,2
]}

Christakis, Anna-Katrina S. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Mandell Menkes LLC, Chicago, IL USA

[2] Amer Bar Assoc, Sect Business Law, Comm Consumer Financial Serv, Debt Collect Practices & Bankruptcy Subcomm, Chicago, IL 60611 USA

来源：

BUSINESS LAWYER | 2008年 / 63卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：717 / 728

页数：12

共 40 条

[21] FEDERAL REVIEW OF AMBIGUOUS STATE COURT DECISIONS - AN OPPORTUNITY FOR JUDICIAL CENTRALIZATION
Patterson, Archibald A.
VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW, 1941, 27 (07) : 900 - 912
[22] FEDERAL COURT REVIEW OF STATE REGULATION OF BUSINESS - THE ROWAN & NICHOLS CASES
不详
YALE LAW JOURNAL, 1942, 51 (04): : 680 - 687
[23] Direct and collateral federal court review of the adequacy of state procedural rules
Struve, CT
COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 2003, 103 (02) : 243 - 315
[24] FEDERAL REVIEW OF STATE COURT-DECISIONS OF FEDERAL QUESTIONS - NEED FOR ADDITIONAL APPELLATE CAPACITY
STOLZ, P
CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 1976, 64 (04) : 943 - 983
[25] FEDERAL REVIEW OF STATE PROCEDURE - THE LITIGATION IN AMERICAN SURETY COMPANY v. BALDWIN
不详
YALE LAW JOURNAL, 1933, 42 (03): : 427 - 430
[26] POWER OF FEDERAL APPELLATE COURT TO REVIEW RULING ON MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL
Hinton, E. W.
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW, 1933, 1 (01): : 111 - 114
[27] An intermediate solution to state sovereign immunity: Federal appellate court review of state-court judgments after Seminole tribe
Pfander, JE
UCLA LAW REVIEW, 1998, 46 (01) : 161 - 229
[28] PROTECTING STATE PROCEDURAL RIGHTS IN FEDERAL COURT - NEW ROLE FOR SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS
HOFSTADTER, SK
STANFORD LAW REVIEW, 1978, 30 (05) : 1019 - 1068
[29] AN EXPANSION OF THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE: FEDERAL SUPREME COURT REVIEW OF ERRORS IN THE APPLICATION OF STATE LAWS
不详
YALE LAW JOURNAL, 1917, 27 (01): : 121 - 126
[30] Remanding to congress: The Supreme Court's new "on the record" constitutional review of federal statutes
Bryant, AC
Simeone, TJ
CORNELL LAW REVIEW, 2001, 86 (02) : 328 - 396

← 1 2 3 4 →