Effects of d-amphetamine on response acquisition with immediate and delayed reinforcement

被引:26
|
作者
LeSage, MG [1 ]
Byrne, T [1 ]
Poling, A [1 ]
机构
[1] WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIV,DEPT PSYCHOL,KALAMAZOO,MI 49008
关键词
delayed reinforcement; d-amphetamine; acquisition; tandem schedules; water; lever press; rats;
D O I
10.1901/jeab.1996.66-349
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The present study examined in 8-hour sessions the effects of d-amphetamine (1.0, 5.6, and 10 mg/kg) on the acquisition of lever-press responding in rats that were exposed to procedures in which water delivery was delayed by 0, 8, or 16 seconds relative to the response that produced it. Both nonresetting- and resetting-delay conditions were studied. Although neither shaping nor autoshaping occurred, substantial levels of operative-lever responding developed under all conditions in which responses produced water. The lowest dose (1.0 mg/kg) of d-amphetamine either had no effect on or increased operative-lever pressing, whereas higher doses typically produced an initial reduction in lever pressing. Nonetheless, overall rates of operative-lever pressing at these doses were as high as, or higher than, those observed with vehicle. Thus, response acquisition was observed under ail reinforcement procedures at all drug doses. In the absence of the drug, most responding occurred on the operative lever when reinforcement was immediate. Such differential responding also developed under both nonresetting- and resetting-delay procedures when the delay was 8 seconds, but not when it was 16 seconds. d-Amphetamine did not affect the development of differential responding under any procedure. Thus, consistent with d-amphetamine's effects under repeated acquisition procedures, the drug had no detrimental effect on learning until doses that produced general behavioral disruption were administered.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 367
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effects of behavioral history on response acquisition with immediate and delayed reinforcement
    Snycerski, S
    Laraway, S
    Huitema, BE
    Poling, A
    JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 2004, 81 (01) : 51 - 64
  • [2] Response acquisition with immediate and delayed conditioned reinforcement
    Snycerski, S
    Laraway, S
    Poling, A
    BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2005, 68 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [3] Raped acquisition of preference in concurrent chains: Effects of d-amphetamine on sensitivity to reinforcement delay
    Ta, Wei-Min
    Pitts, Raymond C.
    Hughes, Christine E.
    Mcleani, Anthony P.
    Grace, Randolph C.
    JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 2008, 89 (01) : 71 - 91
  • [4] Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent schedules: Effects of d-amphetamine on sensitivity to reinforcement amount
    Maguire, David R.
    Rodewald, Andrew M.
    Hughes, Christine E.
    Pitts, Raymond C.
    BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2009, 81 (02) : 238 - 243
  • [5] Contingency tracking during unsignaled delayed reinforcement: Effects of delay duration and d-amphetamine
    Nighbor, Tyler D.
    Ozga-Hess, Jenny E.
    Anderson, Karen G.
    Lattal, Kennon A.
    JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 2019, 111 (03) : 479 - 492
  • [6] RESPONSE ACQUISITION WITH INTERMITTENT IMMEDIATE AND DELAYED CONDITIONED REINFORCEMENT
    Bermudez, Karina
    Bruner, Carlos A.
    Lattal, Kennon A.
    JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 2013, 99 (02) : 189 - 198
  • [7] Effects of reinforcer magnitude on response acquisition with unsignaled delayed reinforcement
    Doughty, Adam H.
    Galuska, Chad M.
    Dawson, Amy E.
    Brierley, Kaitlyn P.
    BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2012, 90 (02) : 287 - 290
  • [8] Measuring impulsivity in mice using a novel operant delayed reinforcement task:: effects of behavioural manipulations and d-amphetamine
    Isles, AR
    Humby, T
    Wilkinson, LS
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 170 (04) : 376 - 382
  • [9] Effects of d-amphetamine on behavior maintained by signaled and unsignaled delays to reinforcement
    Thomas, Lee D.
    Hughes, Christine E.
    Pitts, Raymond C.
    BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2009, 81 (02) : 264 - 269
  • [10] CONTROL OVER RESPONSE NUMBER BY A TARGETED PERCENTILE SCHEDULE - REINFORCEMENT LOSS AND THE ACUTE EFFECTS OF D-AMPHETAMINE
    GALBICKA, G
    FOWLER, KP
    RITCH, ZJ
    JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1991, 56 (02) : 205 - 215