共 50 条
Comparing switch to ocrelizumab, cladribine or natalizumab after fingolimod treatment cessation in multiple sclerosis
被引:12
|作者:
Zhu, Chao
[1
]
Zhou, Zhen
[2
]
Roos, Izanne
[3
,4
]
Merlo, Daniel
[1
]
Kalincik, Tomas
[3
,4
]
Ozakbas, Serkan
[5
]
Skibina, Olga
[1
,6
]
Kuhle, Jens
[7
,8
]
Hodgkinson, Suzanne
[9
,10
]
Boz, Cavit
[11
]
Alroughani, Raed
[12
]
Lechner-Scott, Jeannette
[13
,14
]
Barnett, Michael
[15
]
Izquierdo, Guillermo
[16
]
Prat, Alexandre
[17
,18
]
Horakova, Dana
[19
,20
,21
]
Havrdova, Eva Kubala
[19
,20
,21
]
Macdonell, Richard
[22
]
Patti, Francesco
[23
,24
]
Khoury, Samia Joseph
[25
]
Slee, Mark
[26
]
Karabudak, Rana
[27
]
Onofrj, Marco
[28
]
Van Pesch, Vincent
[29
]
Prevost, Julie
[30
]
Monif, Mastura
[1
,6
]
Jokubaitis, Vilija
[1
,6
]
van der Walt, Anneke
[1
,6
]
Butzkueven, Helmut
[1
,6
]
机构:
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Neurosci, Cent Clin Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Menzies Inst Med Res, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Med, Clin Outcomes Res Unit, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Dept Neurol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Izmir, Turkey
[6] Alfred Hosp, Dept Neurol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Univ Hosp, Neurol Clin & Policlin, Dept Med, Basel, Switzerland
[8] Univ Hosp, Neurol Clin & Policlin, Dept Clin Res, Basel, Switzerland
[9] Liverpool Hosp, Dept Nephrol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[10] Liverpool Hosp, Dept Neurol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[11] KTU Med Fac Farabi Hosp, Trabzon, Turkey
[12] Amiri Hosp, Div Neurol, Sharq, Kuwait
[13] John Hunter Hosp, Dept Neurol, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[14] Univ Newcastle, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[15] Univ Sydney, Brain & Mind Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[16] Hosp Univ Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain
[17] CHUM, Hop Notre Dame, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[18] Univ Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[19] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med 1, Dept Neurol, Prague, Czech Republic
[20] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med 1, Ctr Clin Neurosci, Prague, Czech Republic
[21] Gen Univ Hosp, Prague, Czech Republic
[22] Austin Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[23] GF Ingrassia, Dept Med & Surg Sci & Adv Technol, Catania, Italy
[24] Univ Catania, Multiple Sclerosis Ctr, Catania, Italy
[25] Amer Univ Beirut, Med Ctr, Nehme & Therese Tohme Multiple Sclerosis Ctr, Beirut, Lebanon
[26] Flinders Univ S Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[27] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Med, Dept Neurol, Ankara, Turkey
[28] Univ G DAnnunzio, Dept Neurosci Imaging & Clin Sci, Chieti, Italy
[29] Clin Univ St Luc, Brussels, Belgium
[30] Ctr Integre Sante & Serv Sociaux Laurentides Poin, St Jerome, PQ, Canada
关键词:
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS;
NEUROIMMUNOLOGY;
PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL;
INTERFERON BETA-1A;
PROPENSITY SCORE;
DOUBLE-BLIND;
EFFICACY;
OUTCOMES;
THERAPY;
SAFETY;
D O I:
10.1136/jnnp-2022-330104
中图分类号:
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background To compare the effectiveness and treatment persistence of ocrelizumab, cladribine and natalizumab in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis switching from fingolimod. Methods Using data from MSBase registry, this multicentre cohort study included subjects who had used fingolimod for >= 6 months and then switched to ocrelizumab, cladribine or natalizumab within 3 months after fingolimod discontinuation. We analysed relapse and disability outcomes after balancing covariates using an inverse-probability-treatment-weighting method. Propensity scores for the three treatments were obtained using multinomial-logistic regression. Due to the smaller number of cladribine users, comparisons of disability outcomes were limited to natalizumab and ocrelizumab. Results Overall, 1045 patients switched to ocrelizumab (n=445), cladribine (n=76) or natalizumab (n=524) after fingolimod. The annualised relapse rate (ARR) for ocrelizumab was 0.07, natalizumab 0.11 and cladribine 0.25. Compared with natalizumab, the ARR ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 0.67 (0.47 to 0.96) for ocrelizumab and 2.31 (1.30 to 4.10) for cladribine; the hazard ratio (95% CI) for time to first relapse was 0.57 (0.40 to 0.83) for ocrelizumab and 1.18 (0.47 to 2.93) for cladribine. Ocrelizumab users had an 89% lower discontinuation rate (95% CI, 0.07 to 0.20) than natalizumab, but also a 51% lower probability of confirmed disability improvement (95% CI, 0.32 to 0.73). There was no difference in disability accumulation. Conclusion After fingolimod cessation, ocrelizumab and natalizumab were more effective in reducing relapses than cladribine. Due to the low ARRs in all three treatment groups, additional observation time is required to determine if statistical difference in ARRs results in long-term disability differences.
引用
收藏
页码:1330 / 1337
页数:8
相关论文