Validation of the Chinese Version of the Stigma Scale of Epilepsy

被引:7
|
作者
Wu, Yuanxia [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Kailing [1 ,2 ]
Wen, Shirui [1 ,2 ]
Xiao, Bo [1 ,2 ]
Feng, Li [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp, Dept Neurol, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Geriatr Disorders, Changsha, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY | 2022年 / 13卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
epilepsy; the stigma scale of epilepsy; validation; China; stigma; FELT STIGMA; PUBLIC-ATTITUDES; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.3389/fneur.2022.796296
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeThis study was carried out to test the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Stigma Scale of Epilepsy (SSE), with aim to better understand the public stigmatizing attitudes of epilepsy in China and help elucidate stigma determinants for interventions. MethodsThe SSE was translated into Simplified Chinese Mandarin. In this study, most of the participants were enrolled via convenience sampling by randomly distributing questionnaires on the streets and parts of the participants were recruited by an online platform named Wenjuanxing. We assessed the psychometric properties of the SSE in 310 Chinese native-speaker. Cronbach's alpha was tested for reliability. Index of Content Validity (CVI) was calculated. Exploratory and confirmatory analysis were used to explore the factor structure and verify the validity of SSE. ResultsThe Cronbach's alpha is 0.936 for the overall scale, and the CVI value is greater than 0.78. The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) extracted SSE six factors: the fear of seizure attacks (factor 1), sympathy for patients with epilepsy (PWEs) (factor 2); difficulties faced by PWEs (factor 3); speculation on PWEs' feeling (factor 4); discrimination against PWEs (factor 5); and knowledge about epilepsy (factor 6). The item 13 was proven to be problematic and has been eliminated. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) ensured the great construct validity (chi(2)/SD = 1.725, goodness of fit index (GFI) = 0.916, and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.048), convergent validity (the factor loads of each item corresponding to each latent variable >0.6, average variance extracted (AVE) > 0.5, and composite reliability (CR) > 0.7), and discrimination validity (all of the absolute value of correlation coefficient are <0.5,and less than the square root of AVE) of the SSE. ConclusionsThe Chinese version of the SSE scale was a valid and reliable tool to measure epilepsy-associated stigma in the Chinese society.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of the Georgian version of a Stigma Scale of Epilepsy
    Kasradze, Sofia
    Gogatishvili, Nino
    Lazariashvili, Marine
    Lomidze, Giorgi
    Sander, Josemir W.
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2023, 148
  • [2] Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the epilepsy stigma scale
    Huang, Kailing
    Wu, Yuanxia
    He, Qiang
    Yang, Haojun
    Du, Yangsa
    Xiao, Bo
    Feng, Li
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2022, 127
  • [3] Development and validation of the Japanese version of the Epilepsy Stigma Scale in adults with epilepsy
    Ogawa, Maimi
    Fujikawa, Mayu
    Tasaki, Katsuya
    Jin, Kazutaka
    Kakisaka, Yosuke
    Nakasato, Nobukazu
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2022, 134
  • [4] Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the Cancer Stigma Scale
    Ye, Xuan
    Liu, Hong-Yue
    Lu, Sheng-Rong
    Zhai, Qing
    Yu, Bo
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2019, 25 (07) : 1622 - 1630
  • [5] Validation and Reliability Study of the Turkish Version of the Stigma Scale of Epilepsy
    Kuloglu Pazarci, Nevin
    Parasiz Yukselen, Nihan
    Aydin, Senay
    Unlusoy Acar, Zeynep
    Necioglu Orken, Dilek
    NOROPSIKIYATRI ARSIVI-ARCHIVES OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY, 2017, 54 (04): : 295 - 300
  • [6] Validation of the Georgian version of the stigma-scale of epilepsy (SSE)
    Lazariashvili, M.
    Kasradze, S.
    Gogatishvili, N.
    BRAIN PATHOLOGY, 2023, 33
  • [7] Assessment of self-stigma in epilepsy: Validation of the German version Epilepsy Self-Stigma Scale (ESSS-G)
    Kuramochi, Izumi
    Iwayama, Takayuki
    Brandt, Christian
    Yoshimasu, Haruo
    Bien, Christian G.
    Hagemann, Anne
    EPILEPSIA OPEN, 2023, 8 (03) : 946 - 958
  • [8] Stigma scale of epilepsy - Validation process
    Fernandes, Paula T.
    Salgado, Priscila C. B.
    Noronha, Ana L. A.
    Sander, Josemir W.
    Li, Li M.
    ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA, 2007, 65 : 35 - 42
  • [9] Validation of the Chinese Version of the Shame and Stigma Scale in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer
    Tseng, Wei-Ting
    Lee, Yu
    Hung, Chi-Fa
    Lin, Pao-Yen
    Chien, Chih-Yen
    Chuang, Hui-Ching
    Fang, Fu-Min
    Li, Shau-Hsuan
    Huang, Tai-Lin
    Chong, Mian-Yoon
    Wang, Liang-Jen
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2019, 11 : 10297 - 10305
  • [10] Validation of Chinese version of the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale in patients with epilepsy
    Yang, Aifang
    Wang, Bin
    Zhu, Guoxing
    Jiao, Zheng
    Fang, Youxin
    Tang, Fengmin
    Ma, Chunlai
    Zhao, Yue
    Cheng, Cai
    Zhong, Mingkang
    SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY, 2014, 23 (04): : 295 - 299