Cognitive-emotional decision making (CEDM): A framework of patient medical decision making

被引:82
作者
Power, Tara E. [1 ]
Swartzman, Leora C. [2 ]
Robinson, John W. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Alberta Hlth Serv, Womens Hlth Resources Ctr, FMC, Calgary Breast Hlth Program, Calgary, AB T2N 4J8, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Psychol, London, ON, Canada
[3] Tom Baker Canc Clin, Dept Psychosocial Resources, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Dept Oncol, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[5] Univ Calgary, Program Clin Psychol, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
关键词
Medical decision making; Emotion; Anticipated; Cognition; HUNTINGTONS-DISEASE; HEALTH-CARE; RISK; REGRET; UNCERTAINTY; CHOICE; PERCEPTIONS; OUTCOMES; SELF; CONSEQUENCES;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2010.05.021
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: Assistance for patients faced with medical decisions has largely focussed on the clarification of information and personal values. Our aim is to draw on the decision research describing the role of emotion in combination with health behaviour models to provide a framework for conceptualizing patient decisions. Methods: A review of the psychological and medical decision making literature concerned with the role of emotion/affect in decision making and health behaviours. Results: Emotion plays an influential role in decision making. Both current and anticipated emotions play a motivational role in choice. Amalgamating these findings with that of Leventhal's (1970) SRM provide a framework for thinking about the influence of emotion on a patient medical decision. Conclusion: Our framework suggests that a patient must cope with four sets of elements. The first two relate to the need to manage the cognitive and emotional aspects of the health threat. The second set relate to the management of the cognitive and emotional elements of the decision, itself. Practice implications: The framework provides a way for practitioners and researchers to frame thinking about a patient medical decision in order to assist the patient in clarifying decisional priorities. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 169
页数:7
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]   Patient preferences for autonomy in decision making in asthma management [J].
Adams, RJ ;
Smith, BJ ;
Ruffin, RE .
THORAX, 2001, 56 (02) :126-132
[2]   PREDICTION OF GOAL-DIRECTED BEHAVIOR - ATTITUDES, INTENTIONS, AND PERCEIVED BEHAVIORAL-CONTROL [J].
AJZEN, I ;
MADDEN, TJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 22 (05) :453-474
[3]   Why patients use alternative medicine - Results of a national study [J].
Astin, JA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 279 (19) :1548-1553
[4]   Should patients have control over their own health care?: Empirical evidence and research issues [J].
Auerbach, SM .
ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2000, 22 (03) :246-259
[5]   How effortful decisions get enacted: The motivating role of decision processes, desires, and anticipated emotions [J].
Bagozzi, R ;
Dholakia, UM ;
Basuroy, S .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2003, 16 (04) :273-295
[6]  
Becker M.H., 1974, Health Education Monographs, V2, P326, DOI [DOI 10.1177/1090198174002004, 10.1177/109019817400200407, DOI 10.1177/109019817400200407]
[7]   DISAPPOINTMENT IN DECISION-MAKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY [J].
BELL, DE .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1985, 33 (01) :1-27
[8]   Molecular and clinical characteristics of MSH6 variants:: An analysis of 25 index carriers of a germline variant [J].
Berends, MJW ;
Wu, Y ;
Sijmons, RH ;
Mensink, RGJ ;
van der Sluis, T ;
Hordijk-Hos, JM ;
de Vries, EGE ;
Hollema, H ;
Karrenbeld, A ;
Buys, CHCM ;
van der Zee, AGJ ;
Hofstra, RMW ;
Kleibeuker, JH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2002, 70 (01) :26-37
[9]   Perceived risk and worry: The effects of 9/11 on willingness to fly [J].
Bergstrom, RL ;
McCaul, KD .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 34 (09) :1846-1856
[10]  
BLUMENTHAL D, 2004, HLTH AFFAIRS S, P124