Molecular phylogeny and systematics of the tribe Chorisporeae (Brassicaceae)

被引:21
作者
German, Dmitry A. [1 ,3 ]
Grant, Jason R. [2 ]
Lysak, Martin A. [3 ,4 ]
Al-Shehbaz, Ihsan A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Altai State Univ, S Siberian Bot Garden, Barnaul 656049, Russia
[2] Univ Neuchatel, Inst Biol, Lab Bot Evolut, CH-2000 Neuchatel, Switzerland
[3] Masaryk Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Funct Genom & Prote, CS-61137 Brno, Czech Republic
[4] Masaryk Univ, CEITEC, CS-60177 Brno, Czech Republic
[5] Missouri Bot Garden, St Louis, MO 63166 USA
关键词
Brassicaceae; Chorisporeae; Generic delimitation; Phylogeny; Parrya; SOLMS-LAUBACHIA BRASSICACEAE; INTERNAL TRANSCRIBED SPACER; GENERA BRASSICACEAE; ARABIDOPSIS-LYRATA; DRABA BRASSICACEAE; DNA-SEQUENCES; NUCLEAR; CHLOROPLAST; EVOLUTION; CARDAMINE;
D O I
10.1007/s00606-011-0452-0
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Sequence data from nuclear (ITS) and chloroplast (trnL-F) regions for 89 accessions representing 56 out of 64 species from all five genera of the tribe Chorisporeae (plus Dontostemon tibeticus) have been studied to test the monophyly of the tribe and its component genera, clarify its boundaries, and elucidate its phylogenetic position in the family. Both data sets showed strong support for the monophyly of the Chorisporeae as currently delimited, though the position of its tentative member D. tibeticus was not resolved by ITS. Parrya and Pseudoclausia are poly and paraphyletic with regard to each other, and Chorispora is either polyphyletic or at least paraphyletic (comprising Diptychocarpus) within a weakly supported monophyletic clade. The incongruence in branching pattern among the markers was most likely caused by hybridization and possibly influenced by incomplete lineage sorting. The present results suggest uniting Pseudoclausia, Clausia podlechii, and Achoriphragma with Parrya and transferring P. beketovii and P. saposhnikovii to Leiospora (Euclidieae). We also obtained support for splitting Chorispora into two geographically defined groups, one of which is closer to Diptychocarpus. Both data sets revealed a close relationship of the Chorisporeae to Dontostemoneae, while ITS also indicated affinity to Hesperideae. Therefore, the position of Chorisporeae needs further verification.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 86
页数:22
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]   Systematics and phylogeny of the Brassicaceae (Cruciferae): an overview [J].
Al-Shehbaz, I. A. ;
Beilstein, M. A. ;
Kellogg, E. A. .
PLANT SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION, 2006, 259 (2-4) :89-120
[2]  
Al-Shehbaz I. A., 2010, FLORA N AM, V7, P511
[3]   What is Nasturtium tibeticum (Brassicaceae)? [J].
Al-Shehbaz, IA .
NOVON, 2000, 10 (04) :334-336
[4]  
Al-Shehbaz Ihsan A., 2007, Harvard Papers in Botany, V12, P429, DOI 10.3100/1043-4534(2007)12[429:TNTDAM]2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]  
Al-Shehbaz IA, 2007, NOVON, V17, P275, DOI 10.3417/1055-3177(2007)17[275:PNBANS]2.0.CO
[7]  
2
[9]  
ALSHEHBAZ IA, 1984, J ARNOLD ARBORETUM, V65, P343
[10]  
[Anonymous], FLORA USSR