A comparison of four precipitation distribution models used in daily stochastic models

被引:28
作者
Liu Yonghe [2 ,5 ,6 ]
Zhang Wanchang [1 ]
Shao Yuehong [3 ]
Zhang Kexin [4 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Ctr Hydrosci Res, Nanjing 210093, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Atmospher Phys, Key Lab Reg Climate Environm Res Temperate E Asia, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Appl Hydrometeorol Res Inst, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[4] Linyi Meteorol Bur, Linyi 276004, Shandong, Peoples R China
[5] Henan Polytech Univ, Inst Resources & Environm, Jiaozuo 454000, Peoples R China
[6] Chinese Acad Sci, Grad Univ, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
关键词
weather generators; gamma distribution; mixed-exponential distribution; Markov chain; Fourier series; DAILY RAINFALL; INTERANNUAL VARIABILITY; WEATHER GENERATORS; MIXTURE MODEL; CLIMATE; OVERDISPERSION; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00376-010-9180-6
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Stochastic weather generators are statistical models that produce random numbers that resemble the observed weather data on which they have been fitted; they are widely used in meteorological and hydrological simulations. For modeling daily precipitation in weather generators, first-order Markov chain-dependent exponential, gamma, mixed-exponential, and lognormal distributions can be used. To examine the performance of these four distributions for precipitation simulation, they were fitted to observed data collected at 10 stations in the watershed of Yishu River. The parameters of these models were estimated using a maximum-likelihood technique performed using genetic algorithms. Parameters for each calendar month and the Fourier series describing parameters for the whole year were estimated separately. Bayesian information criterion, simulated monthly mean, maximum daily value, and variance were tested and compared to evaluate the fitness and performance of these models. The results indicate that the lognormal and mixed-exponential distributions give smaller BICs, but their stochastic simulations have overestimation and underestimation respectively, while the gamma and exponential distributions give larger BICs, but their stochastic simulations produced monthly mean precipitation very well. When these distributions were fitted using Fourier series, they all underestimated the above statistics for the months of June, July and August.
引用
收藏
页码:809 / 820
页数:12
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   A semiparametric multivariate and multisite weather generator [J].
Apipattanavis, Somkiat ;
Podesta, Guillermo ;
Rajagopalan, Balaji ;
Katz, Richard W. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2007, 43 (11)
[2]   Downscaling from GCMs to local climate through stochastic linkages [J].
Bardossy, A .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1997, 49 (01) :7-17
[3]   Stochastic downscaling of numerical climate model simulations [J].
Bates, BC ;
Charles, SP ;
Hughes, JP .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 1998, 13 (3-4) :325-331
[4]   SOME REMARKS ON USE OF DAILY RAINFALL MODELS [J].
BUISHAND, TA .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1978, 36 (3-4) :295-308
[5]  
CEO R, 1982, J APPL METEOR, V21, P1024
[6]   Stochastic models for daily rainfall in the Western Pacific [J].
Chapman, TG .
MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION, 1997, 43 (3-6) :351-358
[7]   A stochastic model for daily rainfall disaggregation into fine time scale for a barge region [J].
Gyasi-Agyei, Yeboah ;
Bin Mahbub, S. M. Parvez .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2007, 347 (3-4) :358-370
[8]   Correcting low-frequency variability bias in stochastic weather generators [J].
Hansen, JW ;
Mavromatis, T .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2001, 109 (04) :297-310
[9]  
Katz RW, 1998, J CLIMATE, V11, P591, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<0591:OPISMO>2.0.CO
[10]  
2