Clustering of patients with chronic low back pain in terms of physical and psychological factors: A cross-sectional study based on the STarT Back Screening Tool

被引:10
|
作者
Yadollahpour, Nava [1 ]
Zahednejad, Shahla [1 ]
Yazdi, Mohammad Jafar Shaterzadeh [1 ]
Esfandiarpour, Fatemeh [1 ]
机构
[1] Ahvaz Jundishapur Univ Med Sci, Musculoskeletal Rehabil Res Ctr, Sch Rehabil Sci, Ahvaz, Iran
关键词
Physical factors; psychological factors; low back pain; clustering; STarT Back Screening Tool; PRIMARY-CARE; TAMPA SCALE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; SUBGROUPING PATIENTS; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; THERAPY; KINESIOPHOBIA; VALIDITY; VERSION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.3233/BMR-181484
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The STarT Back Screening Tool (SBT) is a multidimensional questionnaire consisting of physical and psychological factors which categorizes the patients in the low, medium or high risk subgroups. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between SBT-based subgrouping and clustering of patients with LBP using unidimensional psychological, clinical and physical examination measures. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-seven patients with chronic LBP completed the SBT and uni-dimensional psychological, disability and pain questionnaires. Physical impairments were evaluated through the Physical Impairment Index (PII). Hierarchical and K-means methods were used for cluster analysis. Between-clusters differences and the association between the clusters and SBT-based subgrouping were investigated. RESULTS: Three clusters were identified. The derived clusters were labeled severe, moderate and mild physical-psychologicaldistress clusters, because pain intensity, disability, psychological and physical factors were relatively high, moderate or low, respectively. Most of the patients in moderate and mild physical-psychological distress clusters were categorized as medium risk based on SBT. The mean difference for the PII was higher than that of psychological factors between moderate and mild physical-psychological-distress clusters. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in low and high risk subgroups of SBT were sufficiently differentiated, but patients in a medium risk subgroup had a different profile based on PII. Including additional physical factors in the SBT may be required to better differentiate among patients.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 587
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Usefulness of four commonly used neuropathic pain screening questionnaires in patients with chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study
    Gudala, Kapil
    Ghai, Babita
    Bansal, Dipika
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2017, 30 (01) : 51 - 58
  • [22] THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN AND PHYSICAL FACTORS IN COLLEGIATE POLE VAULTERS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
    Enoki, Shota
    Kuramochi, Rieko
    Murata, Yuki
    Tokutake, Gaku
    Shimizu, Takuya
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2020, 15 (04): : 537 - 547
  • [23] A Responsiveness Analysis of the Subgroups for Targeted Treatment (STarT) Back Screening Tool in Patients With Nonspecific Low Back Pain
    Medeiros, Flavia Cordeiro
    Pena Costa, Leonardo Oliveira
    Oliveira, Indiara Soares
    Menezes Costa, Luciola da Cunha
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2019, 49 (10) : 725 - +
  • [24] Transcultural adaption and psychometric properties of the STarT Back Screening Tool among Finnish low back pain patients
    Susanna Piironen
    Markus Paananen
    Marianne Haapea
    Markku Hupli
    Paavo Zitting
    Katja Ryynänen
    Esa-Pekka Takala
    Katariina Korniloff
    Jonathan C. Hill
    Arja Häkkinen
    Jaro Karppinen
    European Spine Journal, 2016, 25 : 287 - 295
  • [25] Convergent and known group validity of the STarT Back Tool in a Nigerian population with chronic low back pain
    Mbada, Chidozie Emmanuel
    Ojo, Joshua Oluwafunmibi
    Idowu, Opeyemi Ayodiipo
    Afolabi, Taofik Oluwasegun
    Afolabi, Aanuoluwapo Deborah
    Oke, Kayode Israel
    Sonuga, Oluwatobi Ademola
    Karstens, Sven
    Fatoye, Francis
    PHYSIOSCIENCE, 2021, 17 (02) : 75 - 81
  • [26] The internal structure of Brazilian versions of disability questionnaires in patients with chronic low back pain: A cross-sectional study
    Pontes-Silva, Andre
    Avila, Mariana Arias
    Penha, Thaise Fernanda Campos
    Gomes, Cid Andre Fidelis de Paula
    Dibai-Filho, Almir Vieira
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2022, 60
  • [27] Psychosocial factors associated with disability in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: A cross-sectional study
    Yamada, A. S.
    Simon, D.
    Antunes, F. T. T.
    Say, K. G.
    Souza, A. H. d.
    REHABILITACION, 2023, 57 (02):
  • [28] The association of the STarT Back Screening Tool and type of leg pain with low back pain disability trajectories: a prospective cohort study
    Lemmers, Gijs P. G.
    Melis, Rene J. F.
    Pagen, Sophie
    Hak, Robin
    de Snoo, Ellen K.
    Westert, Gert P.
    van der Wees, Philip J.
    Staal, J. Bart
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [29] Factors associated with paravertebral muscle cross-sectional area in patients with chronic low back pain
    Cankurtaran, Damla
    Yigman, Zeynep Aykin
    Umay, Ebru
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2021, 34 (04) : 454 - 462
  • [30] Association between Physical Fitness and Low Back Pain: The Pepe Cross-Sectional Study
    Galmes-Panades, Aina M.
    Vidal-Conti, Josep
    CHILDREN-BASEL, 2022, 9 (09):