Clustering of patients with chronic low back pain in terms of physical and psychological factors: A cross-sectional study based on the STarT Back Screening Tool

被引:10
|
作者
Yadollahpour, Nava [1 ]
Zahednejad, Shahla [1 ]
Yazdi, Mohammad Jafar Shaterzadeh [1 ]
Esfandiarpour, Fatemeh [1 ]
机构
[1] Ahvaz Jundishapur Univ Med Sci, Musculoskeletal Rehabil Res Ctr, Sch Rehabil Sci, Ahvaz, Iran
关键词
Physical factors; psychological factors; low back pain; clustering; STarT Back Screening Tool; PRIMARY-CARE; TAMPA SCALE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; SUBGROUPING PATIENTS; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; THERAPY; KINESIOPHOBIA; VALIDITY; VERSION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.3233/BMR-181484
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The STarT Back Screening Tool (SBT) is a multidimensional questionnaire consisting of physical and psychological factors which categorizes the patients in the low, medium or high risk subgroups. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between SBT-based subgrouping and clustering of patients with LBP using unidimensional psychological, clinical and physical examination measures. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-seven patients with chronic LBP completed the SBT and uni-dimensional psychological, disability and pain questionnaires. Physical impairments were evaluated through the Physical Impairment Index (PII). Hierarchical and K-means methods were used for cluster analysis. Between-clusters differences and the association between the clusters and SBT-based subgrouping were investigated. RESULTS: Three clusters were identified. The derived clusters were labeled severe, moderate and mild physical-psychologicaldistress clusters, because pain intensity, disability, psychological and physical factors were relatively high, moderate or low, respectively. Most of the patients in moderate and mild physical-psychological distress clusters were categorized as medium risk based on SBT. The mean difference for the PII was higher than that of psychological factors between moderate and mild physical-psychological-distress clusters. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in low and high risk subgroups of SBT were sufficiently differentiated, but patients in a medium risk subgroup had a different profile based on PII. Including additional physical factors in the SBT may be required to better differentiate among patients.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 587
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Longitudinal Monitoring of Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain During Physical Therapy Treatment Using the STarT Back Screening Tool
    Medeiros, Flavia Cordeiro
    Pena Costa, Leonardo Oliveira
    Nemitalla Added, Marco Aurelio
    Salomao, Evelyn Cassia
    Menezes Costa, Luciola da Cunha
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2017, 47 (05) : 314 - 323
  • [2] Transcultural adaption and psychometric properties of the STarT Back Screening Tool among Finnish low back pain patients
    Piironen, Susanna
    Paananen, Markus
    Haapea, Marianne
    Hupli, Markku
    Zitting, Paavo
    Ryynanen, Katja
    Takala, Esa-Pekka
    Korniloff, Katariina
    Hill, Jonathan C.
    Hakkinen, Arja
    Karppinen, Jaro
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 25 (01) : 287 - 295
  • [3] Cross-cultural validation of the start back screening tool in a Greek low back pain sample
    Billis, Evdokia
    Fousekis, Konstantinos
    Tsekoura, Maria
    Lampropoulou, Sofia
    Matzaroglou, Charalampos
    Gliatis, John
    Sinopidis, Christos
    Hill, Jonathan
    Strimpakos, Nikolaos
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2021, 53
  • [4] Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Chinese Version of the STarT Back Screening Tool in Patients With Low Back Pain
    Luan, Shuo
    Min, Yu
    Li, Guoqi
    Lin, Caina
    Li, Xiao
    Wu, Shaoling
    Ma, Chao
    Hill, Jonathan C.
    SPINE, 2014, 39 (16) : E974 - E979
  • [5] Knowledge related to low back pain and its associated factors in patients with low back pain: A cross-sectional study
    Kanaan, Saddam F.
    Alissa, Hadeel M. K.
    Jaber, Ala'a F.
    Almhdawi, Khader A.
    Mansour, Zaid M.
    Alhanada, Mohammad
    JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2023, 36 (01) : 217 - 225
  • [6] Reliability and screening ability of the StarT Back screening tool in patients with low back pain in physiotherapy practice, a cohort study
    Robinson, Hilde Stendal
    Dagfinrud, Hanne
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2017, 18
  • [7] Subgrouping low back pain: A comparison of the STarT Back Tool with the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire
    Hill, Jonathan C.
    Dunn, Kate M.
    Main, Chris J.
    Hay, Elaine M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2010, 14 (01) : 83 - 89
  • [8] Validity and Reliability of the French Version of the STarT Back Screening Tool for Patients With Low Back Pain
    Bruyere, Olivier
    Demoulin, Maryline
    Beaudart, Charlotte
    Hill, Jonathan C.
    Maquet, Didier
    Genevay, Stephane
    Mahieu, Genevieve
    Reginster, Jean-Yves
    Crielaard, Jean-Michel
    Demoulin, Christophe
    SPINE, 2014, 39 (02) : E123 - E128
  • [9] Italian Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of a Back Pain Screening Questionnaire (Start Back Screening Tool)
    Maggiani, A.
    Abenavoli, A.
    ANNALI DI IGIENE MEDICINA PREVENTIVA E DI COMUNITA, 2019, 31 (01): : 69 - 75
  • [10] The use of STarT back screening tool to predict functional disability outcomes in patients receiving physical therapy for low back pain
    Katzan, Irene L.
    Thompson, Nicolas R.
    George, Steven Z.
    Passek, Sandi
    Frost, Frederick
    Stilphen, Mary
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 19 (04) : 645 - 654