Assessment of nationally recommended antibiotics for treatment of UTI in US-Mexico border emergency departments

被引:3
|
作者
Davis, William H. [1 ]
Magee, Matthew R. [1 ]
Monks, Stormy M. [2 ]
Geno, K. Aaron [3 ]
Crawford, Scott B. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ Hlth Sci El Paso, Paul Foster Sch Med, El Paso, TX USA
[2] Texas Tech Univ Hlth Sci El Paso, Dept Emergency Med, El Paso, TX USA
[3] Texas Tech Univ Hlth Sci El Paso, Dept Pathol, El Paso, TX USA
[4] Dept Emergency Med, 210 N Rick Francis St Suite 302, El Paso, TX 79905 USA
关键词
Urinary tract infection; Emergency department; Antibiotic resistance; Mexico; Border health; URINARY-TRACT-INFECTION; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; UNITED-STATES; ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE; OUTPATIENTS; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; DURATION; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajem.2022.08.023
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) seen in the emergency department are commonly treated as an out-patient with oral antibiotics. Given that antibiotics are available for over-the-counter purchase in Mexico, there is speculation that potential misuse and overuse of antibiotics in United States-Mexico border areas could lead to an-tibiotic resistance patterns that would render some empiric treatments for UTIs less effective. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) guideline-recommended an-tibiotics for treatment of outpatient UTI diagnosed in the emergency department. Data were collected from a county hospital on the U.S.-Mexico border with a metropolitan area of over 2 million people. Secondary analysis included frequency of urine culture isolated, resistance rates of urine pathogens, and prescriber habits. Methods: This study was a retrospective chart review of adult patients diagnosed and treated for UTI from August 1, 2019, to February 29, 2020. Culture results of included patients were analyzed against in vitro-tested antibiotics. Bac-terial isolate frequency, resistance rates, and prescribing habits were collected. Results: A total of 985 patient charts were reviewed, of which 520 patients met inclusion criteria for analysis of pre-scribing habits. Of these, 329 positive bacterial culture growths were included in the analysis of antibiotic resistance rates. Oral antibiotics with comparatively lower resistance rates were amoxicillin/clavulanate, cefdinir, cefuroxime, and nitrofurantoin. Oral antibiotics with notably high resistance rates included trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and cephalexin. Nitrofurantoin was prescribed most frequently for outpatient treatment of UTI/cystitis (41.6%) while cephalexin was the most commonly prescribed antibiotic for outpatient treatment of pyelonephritis (50%). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that, while part of standard IDSA guidelines, fluoroquinolones and TMP-SMX are not ideal empiric antibiotics for treatment of outpatient UTI in the U.S.-Mexico border region studied due to high resistance rates. Although not listed as first line agents per current IDSA recommendations, 2nd and 3rd generation cephalospo-rins, and amoxicillin/clavulanate would be acceptable options given resistance patterns demonstrated in accordance with IDSA allowance for tailoring selection to local resistance. Nitrofurantoin appears to be consistent with recommen-dations and demonstrates a favorable resistance profile for treatment of outpatient UTI within this region. (c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 17
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Drug use on both sides of the US-Mexico border
    Borges, Guilherme
    Zemore, Sarah E.
    Orozco, Ricardo
    Cherpitel, Cheryl J.
    Martinez, Priscilla
    Wallisch, Lynn
    SALUD PUBLICA DE MEXICO, 2018, 60 (04): : 451 - 461
  • [2] Analyzing the Homeland Security of the US-Mexico Border
    Wein, Lawrence M.
    Liu, Yifan
    Motskin, Arik
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2009, 29 (05) : 699 - 713
  • [3] THE ROLE OF THE US-MEXICO BORDER AS A DESTINATION: STUDENT TRAVELER PERCEPTIONS
    Timothy, Dallen
    Canally, Culum
    TOURISM ANALYSIS, 2008, 13 (03): : 259 - 269
  • [4] Accounting for the environmental "bottom line" along the US-Mexico border
    Jerrett, M
    Rey, SJ
    Dufournaud, C
    Jones, D
    ANNALS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN GEOGRAPHERS, 2003, 93 (01) : 67 - 88
  • [5] US-Mexico cross-border cooperation in research on diabetes mellitus type 2
    Canela-Soler, Jaume
    Frontini, Maria
    Teresa Cerqueira, Maria
    Ruiz-Holguin, Rosalba
    Diaz-Apodaca, Beatriz A.
    REVISTA PANAMERICANA DE SALUD PUBLICA-PAN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 28 (03): : 159 - 163
  • [6] Barriers to Care and Comorbidities Along the US-Mexico Border
    de Heer, Hendrik Dirk
    Balcazar, Hector Guillermo
    Morera, Osvaldo F.
    Lapeyrouse, Lisa
    Heyman, Josiah McC.
    Salinas, Jennifer
    Zambrana, Ruth E.
    PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2013, 128 (06) : 480 - 488
  • [7] Nataniel, NAFTA, and Public Health at the US-Mexico Border
    Olson, Tom
    Tapia, Sergio
    PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING, 2009, 26 (06) : 561 - 567
  • [8] Chlamydial infection in women along the US-Mexico border
    Baldwin, SB
    Djambazov, B
    Papenfuss, M
    Abrahamsen, M
    Denman, C
    de Zapien, JG
    Ortega, L
    Henze, JLN
    Hunter, J
    Rojas, M
    García, F
    Giuliano, AR
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 2004, 15 (12) : 815 - 821
  • [9] Conservation biogeography of the US-Mexico border: a transcontinental risk assessment of barriers to animal dispersal
    Lasky, Jesse R.
    Jetz, Walter
    Keitt, Timothy H.
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2011, 17 (04) : 673 - 687
  • [10] Cross-border school enrolment: Associated factors in the US-Mexico borderlands
    Orraca, Pedro
    Rocha, David
    Vargas, Eunice
    SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2017, 54 (04) : 389 - 402