Analysis of results from the Joint External Evaluation: examining its strength and assessing for trends among participating countries

被引:33
作者
Gupta, Vin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kraemer, John D. [4 ]
Katz, Rebecca [5 ]
Jha, Ashish K. [6 ]
Keny, Vanessa B. [7 ,8 ,9 ]
Sane, Jussi [10 ]
Ollgren, Jukka [10 ]
Salminen, Mika O. [10 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Harvard Global Hlth Inst, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Inst Hlth Metr & Evaluat, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Georgetown Univ, Dept Hlth Syst Adm, Washington, DC USA
[5] Georgetown Univ, Ctr Global Hlth Sci & Secur, Washington, DC USA
[6] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy, Boston, MA USA
[7] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Global Hlth & Social Med, Boston, MA USA
[8] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, MGH Global Hlth, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[9] Seed Global Hlth, Boston, MA USA
[10] Natl Inst Hlth & Welf THL, Dept Hlth Secur, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
INTERNATIONAL HEALTH REGULATIONS; LESSONS; EBOLA;
D O I
10.7189/jogh.08.020416
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background The Joint External Evaluation (JEE) is part of the World Health Organization's (WHO) new process to help countries assess their ability to prevent, detect and respond to public health threats such as infectious disease outbreaks, as specified by the International Health Regulations (IHR). How countries are faring on these evaluations is not well known and neither is there any previous assessment of the performance characteristics of the JEE process itself. Methods We obtained JEE data for 48 indicators collectively across 19 technical areas of preparedness for 55 countries. The indicators are scored on a 1 to 5 scale with 4 indicating demonstrated capacity. We created a standardized JEE index score representing cumulative performance across indicators using principal components analysis. We examined the state of performance across all indicators and then examined the relationship between this index score and select demographic and health variables to better understand potential drivers of performance. Results Among our study cohort, the median performance on 43 of the 48 (89.6%) indicators was less than 4, suggesting that countries were failing to meet demonstrated capacity on these measures. The two weakest indicators were related to antimicrobial resistance (median score=1.0, interquartile range=1.0-2.0) and biosecurity response (median score=2.0, interquartile range=2.0-3.0). JEE index scores correlated with various metrics of health outcomes (life expectancy, under-five year mortality rate, disability-adjusted life years lost. to communicable diseases) and with standard measures of social and economic development that enable public health system performance in the total sample, but in stratified analyses, these relationships were much weaker in the AFRO region. Conclusions We find large variations in JEE scores among countries and WHO regions with many nations still unprepared for the next disease outbreak with pandemic potential The strong correlations between JEE performance and metrics of both health outcomes and health systems' performance suggests that the JEE is likely accurately measuring the strength of IHR-specific, public health capabilities.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [21] WHO, 2016, 69 ANN WORLD HLTH AS
  • [22] World Health Organization, 2015, IMPL INT HLTH REG 20
  • [23] World Health Organization, 2015, 68 WORLD HLTH ASS EB
  • [24] World Health Organization, 2005, TECHN CONS MON EV FU
  • [25] World Health Organization, Joint External Evaluation Tool
  • [26] World Health Organization, 2017, STRAT PARTN PORT BUI
  • [27] World Health Organization, 2005, DEV MON EV FUNCT COR
  • [28] World Health Organization, COUNTR JEE MISS REP