Teacher Artificial Intelligence-Supported Pedagogical Actions in Collaborative Learning Coregulation: A Wizard-of-Oz Study

被引:21
作者
Kasepalu, Reet [1 ]
Prieto, Luis P. [1 ]
Ley, Tobias [1 ,2 ]
Chejara, Pankaj [3 ]
机构
[1] Tallinn Univ, Sch Educ Sci, Tallinn, Estonia
[2] Danube Univ Krems, Dept Continuing Educ Res & Educ Technol, Krems An Der Donau, Austria
[3] Tallinn Univ, Sch Digital Technol, Tallinn, Estonia
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
collaborative learning (CL); artificial intelligence (AI); pedagogical actions; teacher intervention; coregulation; mixed methods; collaboration analytics; Wizard-of-Oz; ANALYTICS;
D O I
10.3389/feduc.2022.736194
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Orchestrating collaborative learning (CL) is difficult for teachers as it involves being aware of multiple simultaneous classroom events and intervening when needed. Artificial intelligence (AI) technology might support the teachers' pedagogical actions during CL by helping detect students in need and providing suggestions for intervention. This would be resulting in AI and teacher co-orchestrating CL; the effectiveness of which, however, is still in question. This study explores whether having an AI assistant helping the teacher in orchestrating a CL classroom is understandable for the teacher and if it affects the teachers' pedagogical actions, understanding and strategies of coregulation. Twenty in-service teachers were interviewed using a Wizard-of-Oz protocol. Teachers were asked to identify problems during the CL of groups of students (shown as videos), proposed how they would intervene, and later received (and evaluated) the pedagogical actions suggested by an AI assistant. Our mixed-methods analysis showed that the teachers found the AI assistant useful. Moreover, in multiple cases the teachers started employing the pedagogical actions the AI assistant had introduced to them. Furthermore, an increased number of coregulation methods were employed. Our analysis also explores the extent to which teachers' expertise is associated with their understanding of coregulation, e.g., less experienced teachers did not see coregulation as part of a teacher's responsibility, while more experienced teachers did.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Allal L., 2020, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy Practice, V27, P332, DOI [DOI 10.1080/0969594X.2019.1609411, 10.1080/0969594X.2019.1609411]
[2]  
Alumae T., 2018, P 8 INT C BALT HLT 2
[3]   An Actionable Orchestration Dashboard to Enhance Collaboration in the Classroom [J].
Amarasinghe, Ishari ;
Hernandez-Leo, Davinia ;
Michos, Konstantinos ;
Vujovic, Milica .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 13 (04) :662-675
[4]   Stupid Tutoring Systems, Intelligent Humans [J].
Baker, Ryan S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION, 2016, 26 (02) :600-614
[5]  
Barkley F. E., 2014, COLLABORATIVE LEARNI
[6]   Bridging research and practice: Implementing and sustaining knowledge building in Hong Kong classrooms [J].
Chan, Carol K. K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, 2011, 6 (02) :147-186
[7]   EFAR-MMLA: An Evaluation Framework to Assess and Report Generalizability of Machine Learning Models in MMLA [J].
Chejara, Pankaj ;
Prieto, Luis P. ;
Ruiz-Calleja, Adolfo ;
Rodriguez-Triana, Maria Jesus ;
Shankar, Shashi Kant ;
Kasepalu, Reet .
SENSORS, 2021, 21 (08)
[8]   Quantifying Collaboration Quality in Face-to-Face Classroom Settings Using MMLA [J].
Chejara, Pankaj ;
Prieto, Luis P. ;
Ruiz-Calleja, Adolfo ;
Rodriguez-Triana, Maria Jesus ;
Shankar, Shashi Kant ;
Kasepalu, Reet .
COLLABORATION TECHNOLOGIES AND SOCIAL COMPUTING, COLLABTECH 2020, 2020, 12324 :159-166
[9]   WIZARD OF OZ STUDIES - WHY AND HOW [J].
DAHLBACK, N ;
JONSSON, A ;
AHRENBERG, L .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 1993, 6 (04) :258-266