A NEW COMBINATIVE DISTANCE-BASED ASSESSMENT (CODAS) METHOD FOR MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING

被引:0
作者
Keshavarz Ghorabaee, Mehdi [1 ]
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras [2 ]
Turskis, Zenonas [2 ]
Antucheviciene, Jurgita [2 ]
机构
[1] Allameh Tabatabai Univ, Fac Management & Accounting, Dept Ind Management, Tehran, Iran
[2] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Fac Civil Engn, Dept Construct Technol & Management, Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
Multi-criteria decision-making; MCDM; MADM; Euclidean distance; Taxicab distance; CODAS; MOORA METHOD; ARAS METHOD; MULTIMOORA; EXTENSION; PROJECTS; RANKING;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A key factor to attain success in any discipline, especially in a field which requires handling large amounts of information and knowledge, is decision making. Most real-world decision-making problems involve a great variety of factors and aspects that should be considered. Making decisions in such environments can often be a difficult operation to perform. For this reason, we need multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods and techniques, which can assist us for dealing with such complex problems. The aim of this paper is to present a new COmbinative Distance-based ASsessment (CODAS) method to handle MCDM problems. To determine the desirability of an alternative, this method uses the Euclidean distance as the primary and the Taxicab distance as the secondary measure, and these distances are calculated according to the negative ideal point. The alternative which has greater distances is more desirable in the CODAS method. Some numerical examples are used to illustrate the process of the proposed method. We also perform a comparative sensitivity analysis to examine the results of CODAS and compare it by some existing MCDM methods. These analyses show that the proposed method is efficient, and the results are stable.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 44
页数:20
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Balezentis A, 2012, INFORMATICA-LITHUAN, V23, P173
[2]   AN INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT OF LITHUANIAN ECONOMIC SECTORS BASED ON FINANCIAL RATIOS AND FUZZY MCDM METHODS [J].
Balezentis, Alvydas ;
Balezentis, Tomas ;
Misiunas, Algimantas .
TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2012, 18 (01) :34-53
[3]  
Balezentis A, 2011, ECON COMPUT ECON CYB, V45, P37
[4]   A Survey on Development and Applications of the Multi-criteria Decision Making Method MULTIMOORA [J].
Balezentis, Tomas ;
Balezentis, Alvydas .
JOURNAL OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2014, 21 (3-4) :209-222
[5]  
Belton V., 2002, MULIPLE CRITERIA DEC
[6]   HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS - THE PROMETHEE METHOD [J].
BRANS, JP ;
VINCKE, P ;
MARESCHAL, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1986, 24 (02) :228-238
[7]   A PREFERENCE RANKING ORGANIZATION METHOD - (THE PROMETHEE METHOD FOR MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING) [J].
BRANS, JP ;
VINCKE, PH .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1985, 31 (06) :647-656
[8]  
Brauers WKM, 2006, CONTROL CYBERN, V35, P445
[9]   PROJECT MANAGEMENT BY MULTIMOORA AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR TRANSITION ECONOMIES [J].
Brauers, Willem Karel M. ;
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras .
TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2010, 16 (01) :5-24
[10]   Applications of WASPAS Method in Manufacturing Decision Making [J].
Chakraborty, Shankar ;
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras .
INFORMATICA, 2014, 25 (01) :1-20