Testicular cancer and YouTube: What do you expect from a social media platform?

被引:30
作者
Di Bello, Francesco [1 ]
Ruvolo, Claudia Colla [1 ]
Cilio, Simone [1 ]
La Rocca, Roberto [1 ]
Capece, Marco [1 ]
Creta, Massimiliano [1 ]
Celentano, Giuseppe [1 ]
Califano, Gianluigi [1 ]
Morra, Simone [1 ]
Iacovazzo, Carmine [1 ]
Coviello, Antonio [1 ]
Buonanno, Pasquale [1 ]
Fusco, Ferdinando [2 ]
Imbimbo, Ciro [1 ]
Mirone, Vincenzo [1 ]
Longo, Nicola [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Neurosci Reprod Sci & Odontostomatol, Via Sergio Pansini 5, I-80138 Naples, Italy
[2] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Woman Child & Gen & Specialist Surg, Urol Unit, Caserta, Italy
关键词
fertility; patient information; social media; testis cancer; urology; YouTube; NEEDS;
D O I
10.1111/iju.14871
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the quality information on testicular cancer uploaded on YouTube (TM) videos. Methods YouTube (TM) videos were searched using "Testicular cancer" as a keyword. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool, the Misinformation scale, and the DISCERN tool were used to assess the quality information of YouTube (TM) videos on testicular cancer. Results According to the selection criteria, 121 YouTube (TM) videos were collected for the analysis and stratified according to uploading year (2009-2014 vs 2015-2020). According to the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for audio-visual content, the overall Understandability score was 60% (interquartile range 45.5-75) and the overall Actionability score was 100% (interquartile range 66.7-100). According to the Misinformation scale, the lowest median was recorded for item 6 ("Effects on fertility") and the overall median Misinformation score was 2 (interquartile range 1.3-2.8). No statistically significant differences were observed according to uploading year (all P > 0.05). Of all, only 54 (44.6%) videos mentioning treatment were subsequently analyzed. Of these videos, the overall Understandability was 71.4% (interquartile range 56.3-84.6) and the overall Actionability was 100% (interquartile range 66.7-100). The overall Misinformation score was 2.8 (interquartile range 2.2-3.5). The median DISCERN score recorded for question 16 was 5 (interquartile range 3-5). Conclusions YouTube (TM) is a fast and open-access source for mass information. The overall quality of the testicular cancer contents provided is sadly unsatisfactory, in the present likewise in the past. However, YouTube (TM) videos mentioning treatment options showed higher quality content, than the remaining one. Nevertheless, all the videos analyzed underestimated the testicular cancer effects on fertility. Nowadays, YouTube (TM) cannot be recommended as a reliable source of information on testicular cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 691
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Men's experiences of surviving testicular cancer: an integrated literature review
    Alexis, Obrey
    Adeleye, Adeniyi O.
    Worsley, Aaron James
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2020, 14 (03) : 284 - 293
  • [2] American Cancer Society, TEST CANC
  • [3] Testicular cancer survivors' supportive care needs and use of online support: a cross-sectional survey
    Bender, Jacqueline L.
    Wiljer, David
    To, Matthew J.
    Bedard, Philippe L.
    Chung, Peter
    Jewett, Michael A. S.
    Matthew, Andrew
    Moore, Malcolm
    Warde, Padraig
    Gospodarowicz, Mary
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2012, 20 (11) : 2737 - 2746
  • [4] A Systematic Review of the Use of Social Media for Dissemination of Clinical Practice Guidelines
    Bhatt, Nikita R.
    Czarniecki, Stefan W.
    Borgmann, Hendrick
    van Oort, Inge M.
    Esperto, Francesco
    Pradere, Benjamin
    van Gurp, Mark
    Bloemberg, Jarka
    Darraugh, J.
    Roupret, Morgan
    Loeb, Stacy
    N'Dow, James
    Ribal, Maria J.
    Giannarini, Gianluca
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2021, 7 (05): : 1195 - 1204
  • [5] YouTube as a source of information on penile prosthesis
    Capece, Marco
    Di Giovanni, Angelo
    Cirigliano, Lorenzo
    Napolitano, Luigi
    La Rocca, Roberto
    Creta, Massimiliano
    Califano, Gianluigi
    Crocetto, Felice
    Ruvolo, Claudia Colla
    Celentano, Giuseppe
    Palmieri, Alessandro
    [J]. ANDROLOGIA, 2022, 54 (01)
  • [6] SARS-CoV-2 infection affects the lower urinary tract and male genital system: A systematic review
    Creta, Massimiliano
    Sagnelli, Caterina
    Celentano, Giuseppe
    Napolitano, Luigi
    La Rocca, Roberto
    Capece, Marco
    Califano, Gianluigi
    Calogero, Armando
    Sica, Antonello
    Mangiapia, Francesco
    Ciccozzi, Massimo
    Fusco, Ferdinando
    Mirone, Vincenzo
    Sagnelli, Evangelista
    Longo, Nicola
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 93 (05) : 3133 - 3142
  • [7] Analysis of the YouTube videos on pelvic floor muscle exercise training in terms of their reliability and quality
    Culha, Yeliz
    Seyhan Ak, Ezgi
    Merder, Erkan
    Ariman, Ahmet
    Culha, Mehmet Gokhan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 53 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [8] Quality analysis of testicular cancer videos on YouTube
    Duran, Mesut Berkan
    Kizilkan, Yalcin
    [J]. ANDROLOGIA, 2021, 53 (08)
  • [9] Evaluating the Accuracy and Quality of the Information in Kyphosis Videos Shared on YouTube
    Erdem, Mehmet Nuri
    Karaca, Sinan
    [J]. SPINE, 2018, 43 (22) : E1334 - E1339
  • [10] Personal protective equipment in Covid-19: Evidence-based quality and analysis of YouTube videos after one year of pandemic
    Gerundo, Gerardo
    Ruvolo, Claudia Colla
    Puzone, Brunella
    Califano, Gianluigi
    La Rocca, Roberto
    Parisi, Valentina
    Capece, Marco
    Celentano, Giuseppe
    Creta, Massimiliano
    Rengo, Giuseppe
    Leosco, Dario
    Abete, Pasquale
    Longo, Nicola
    Mirone, Vincenzo
    Ferrara, Nicola
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2022, 50 (03) : 300 - 305