Natural variability or climate change? Stakeholder and citizen perceptions of extreme event attribution

被引:48
作者
Osaka, Shannon [1 ]
Bellamy, Rob [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Sch Geog & Environm, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Dept Geog, Arthur Lewis Bldg,Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
来源
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS | 2020年 / 62卷
关键词
Extreme event attribution; Climate change; Perception; California drought; Weather; Climate communication; CALIFORNIA DROUGHT; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTANCE; WEATHER EVENTS; UNCERTAINTY; ADAPTATION; EXPERIENCE; RISK; LIABILITY; SCIENCE; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102070
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Scientists can now connect extreme weather events with climate change using a methodology known as "extreme event attribution", or EEA. The idea of connecting climate change and extreme weather has long been heralded as a panacea for communications, connecting the dangers of climate change to real-world, on-the-ground events. However, event attribution remains a nascent science, and attribution studies of the same event can sometimes produce divergent answers due to precise methodology used, variables examined, and the timescale selected for the event. The 2011-2017 California drought was assessed by 11 EEA studies which came to varying conclusions on its connection to climate change. This article uses the case study of the drought and a multi-methods approach to examine perceptions of EEA among key stakeholders and citizens. Twenty-five key informant interviews were conducted with different stakeholders: scientists performing EEA research, journalists, local and state-level policymakers, and non-governmental organization representatives. In addition, two focus groups with 20 California citizens were convened: one with environmentalists and another with agriculturalists. While climate change was viewed by many as a mild contributing factor to the California drought, many stakeholders had not heard of EEA or doubted that scientists could conclusively link the drought to anthropogenic climate change; those that were familiar with EEA felt that the science was generally uncertain. In the focus groups, presentation of divergent EEA results led participants to revert to pre-existing ideas about the drought-climate connection, or to question whether science had sufficiently advanced to analyze the event properly. These results indicate that while EEA continues to provoke interest and research in the scientific community, it is not currently utilized by many stakeholders, and may entrench the public in pre-existing views.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]   Global warming and changes in risk of concurrent climate extremes: Insights from the 2014 California drought [J].
AghaKouchak, Amir ;
Cheng, Linyin ;
Mazdiyasni, Omid ;
Farahmand, Alireza .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2014, 41 (24) :8847-8852
[2]   Do people "personally experience" global warming, and if so how, and does it matter? [J].
Akerlof, Karen ;
Maibach, Edward W. ;
Fitzgerald, Dennis ;
Cedeno, Andrew Y. ;
Neuman, Amanda .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2013, 23 (01) :81-91
[3]  
Alexander PM, 2014, INFORM RES, V19
[4]   Liability for climate change [J].
Allen, M .
NATURE, 2003, 421 (6926) :891-892
[5]   Scientific challenges in the attribution of harm to human influence on climate [J].
Allen, M'iles ;
Pall, Pardeep ;
Stone, Daithi ;
Stott, Peter ;
Frame, David ;
Min, Seung-Kj ;
Nozawak, Toru ;
Yukimoto, Seiji .
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW, 2007, 155 (06) :1353-1400
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Case Study Research, Design and Methods
[7]  
[Anonymous], CLIMATE DEV
[8]  
[Anonymous], CHALLENGING USE EXTR
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2020, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, DOI DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2016, NY TIMES