Women's abortion seeking behavior under restrictive abortion laws in Mexico

被引:15
|
作者
Juarez, Fatima [1 ,2 ]
Bankole, Akinrinola [2 ]
Palma, Jose Luis [3 ]
机构
[1] Colegio Mexico, Ciudad De Mexico, Mexico
[2] Guttmacher Inst, New York, NY 10038 USA
[3] Invest Salud & Demog SC, Ciudad De Mexico, Mexico
来源
PLOS ONE | 2019年 / 14卷 / 12期
关键词
STIGMA; CITY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0226522
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Abortion is regulated in Mexico at the state level, and it is permitted under certain criteria in all 32 states, except in Mexico City where first-trimester abortion is decriminalized. Yet, more than a million abortions occur in Mexico each year. But most terminations occurring outside of Mexico City are clandestine and unsafe due to profound stigma against the procedure, lack of trained providers, lack of knowledge of where to find a safe abortion and poor knowledge of the laws. While this situation is moderated by the increasing use of misoprostol, a relatively safe method of abortion, the safety of the procedure cannot be assured in restrictive legal contexts. The purpose of this study is to explore women's experiences with induced abortion in three federal entities with different legal contexts, and whether abortion seeking behavior and experiences differ across these settings. The study was carried out in three states, representing three different degrees of restrictiveness of abortion legislation. Queretaro with the "most restrictive" law, Tabasco with a "moderately restrictive" law, and Mexico state with the "least restrictive" law. We hypothesize that women living in more restrictive states will resort to the use of more unsafe and risky methods and providers for their abortion than their counterparts in less restrictive states. Women who recently obtained abortions were selected through snowball sampling and qualitative data were collected from them using semi-structured indepth interviews. Data collection took place between mid 2014 and mid-2015, with a final sample size N = 60 (20 from each state). Various themes involved in the process of abortion seeking behavior were developed from the IDIs and examined here: women's knowledge of the abortion law in their state, reasons for having an abortion; the methods and providers used and women's positive and negative experiences with abortion methods and providers used. Our results indicate that abortion safety is not associated with the restrictiveness of abortion legislation. Findings show that there is a new pattern of abortion service provision in Mexico, with misoprostol, a relatively safe and easy to use method, playing an important role. Nevertheless, while access to misoprostol tends to increase the safety of abortion, the improvement is moderated by women and their informants (relatives, friends and partners) not having accurate information on how to safely self induce an abortion with misoprostol. On the other hand, some women manage to have safe abortion in illegal setting by going to Mexico City or with the support of NGOs knowlegeable on abortion. Findings demonstrate the importance of decriminalization of abortion, but meanwhile, harm reduction strategies, including promotion of accurate information about self-use of misoprostol where abortion is legally restricted will result in safe abortion.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Abortion terminology: views of women seeking abortion in Britain
    Cameron, Sharon
    Lohr, Patricia A.
    Ingham, Roger
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PLANNING AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2017, 43 (04) : 265 - 268
  • [2] Abortion providers, professional identity, and restrictive laws: A qualitative study
    Britton, Laura E.
    Mercier, Rebecca J.
    Buchbinder, Mara
    Bryant, Amy G.
    HEALTH CARE FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 38 (03) : 222 - 237
  • [3] Abortion exile: navigating Mexico's fractured abortion landscape
    Singer, Elyse Ona
    CULTURE HEALTH & SEXUALITY, 2020, 22 (08) : 855 - 870
  • [4] Seeking support for abortion online: a qualitative study of women's experiences
    Wilson-Lowe, Rachel Victoria
    Purcell, Carrie
    Lewis, Ruth
    Mcdaid, Lisa
    BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2024, 50 (03) : 172 - 177
  • [5] "It's not a seven-headed beast": abortion experience among women that received support from helplines for medication abortion in restrictive settings
    Baum, Sarah E.
    Ramirez, Ana Maria
    Larrea, Sara
    Filippa, Sofia
    Egwuatu, Ijeoma
    Wydrzynska, Justyna
    Piasecka, Magdalena
    Nmezi, Sybil
    Jelinska, Kinga
    HEALTH CARE FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 41 (10) : 1128 - 1146
  • [6] Correlates of individual-level abortion stigma among women seeking elective abortion in Nigeria
    Oginni, Ayodeji
    Ahmadu, Sikiratu Kailani
    Okwesa, Nkiruka
    Adejo, Isaac
    Shekerau, Hauwa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2018, 10 : 361 - 366
  • [7] Negotiating the social and medical dangers of abortion in Addis Ababa: An exploration of young, unmarried women's abortion-seeking journeys
    Kebede, Meselu Taye
    Middelthon, Anne-Lise
    Hilden, Per Kristian
    HEALTH CARE FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 39 (02) : 186 - 207
  • [8] Experiences with abortion counselling in Mexico City and Colombia: addressing women's fears and concerns
    Keefe-Oates, Brianna
    Makleff, Shelly
    Sa, Eleuthera
    Janeth Forero, Luz
    Mendoza, Doroteo
    Antonio Olaya, Marco
    Avila Morales, Fabiola
    Friedman, Jennifer
    Baum, Sarah E.
    CULTURE HEALTH & SEXUALITY, 2020, 22 (04) : 413 - 428
  • [9] Racial vulnerability and individual barriers for Brazilian women seeking first care following abortion
    Goes, Emanuelle Freitas
    Menezes, Greice M. S.
    Almeida, Maria-da-Conceicao C.
    Barreto de Araujo, Thalia Velho
    Alves, Sandra Valongueiro
    Britto e Alves, Maria Teresa Seabra Soares
    Aquino, Estela M. L.
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2020, 36
  • [10] Prior Family Planning Experiences of Obese Women Seeking Abortion Care
    Ingraham, Natalie
    Roberts, Sarah C. M.
    Weitz, Tracy A.
    WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2014, 24 (01) : E125 - E130