Considerations in the Selection of Global Climate Models for Regional Climate Projections: The Arctic as a Case Study

被引:89
|
作者
Overland, James E. [1 ]
Wang, Muyin [2 ]
Bond, Nicholas A. [2 ]
Walsh, John E. [3 ]
Kattsov, Vladimir M. [4 ]
Chapman, William L. [5 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, PMEL, Seattle, WA 98185 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Joint Inst Study Atmosphere & Ocean, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK USA
[4] Voeikov Main Geophys Observ, St Petersburg, Russia
[5] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
SIMULATIONS; ENSEMBLE; BUDGET;
D O I
10.1175/2010JCLI3462.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Climate projections at regional scales are in increased demand from management agencies and other stake-holders. While global atmosphere ocean climate models provide credible quantitative estimates of future climate at continental scales and above, individual model performance varies for different regions, variables, and evaluation metrics-a less than satisfying situation. Using the high-latitude Northern Hemisphere as a focus, the authors assess strategies for providing regional projections based on global climate models. Starting with a set of model results obtained from an "ensemble of opportunity," the core of this procedure is to retain a subset of models through comparisons of model simulations with observations at both continental and regional scales. The exercise is more one of model culling than model selection. The continental-scale evaluation is a check on the large-scale climate physics of the models, and the regional-scale evaluation emphasizes variables of ecological or societal relevance. An additional consideration is given to the comprehensiveness of processes included in the models. In many but not all applications, different results are obtained from a reduced set of models compared to relying on the simple mean of all available models. For example, in the Arctic the top-performing models tend to be more sensitive to greenhouse forcing than the poorer-performing models. Because of the mostly unexplained inconsistencies in model performance under different selection criteria, simple and transparent evaluation methods are favored. The use of a single model is not recommended. For some applications, no model may be able to provide a suitable regional projection. The use of model evaluation strategies, as opposed to relying on simple averages of ensembles of opportunity, should be part of future synthesis activities such as the upcoming Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
引用
收藏
页码:1583 / 1597
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] DO CONVECTION-PERMITTING REGIONAL CLIMATE MODELS IMPROVE PROJECTIONS OF FUTURE PRECIPITATION CHANGE?
    Kendon, Elizabeth J.
    Ban, Nikolina
    Roberts, Nigel M.
    Fowler, Hayley J.
    Roberts, Malcolm J.
    Chan, Steven C.
    Evans, Jason P.
    Fosser, Giorgia
    Wilkinson, Jonathan M.
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 98 (01) : 79 - +
  • [42] Interannual predictability of Arctic sea ice in a global climate model: regional contrasts and temporal evolution
    Germe, Agathe
    Chevallier, Matthieu
    Salas y Melia, David
    Sanchez-Gomez, Emilia
    Cassou, Christophe
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2014, 43 (9-10) : 2519 - 2538
  • [43] Mean and extreme temperatures in a warming climate: EURO CORDEX and WRF regional climate high-resolution projections for Portugal
    Cardoso, Rita M.
    Soares, Pedro M. M.
    Lima, Daniela C. A.
    Miranda, Pedro M. A.
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2019, 52 (1-2) : 129 - 157
  • [44] Objective calibration of regional climate models
    Bellprat, O.
    Kotlarski, S.
    Luethi, D.
    Schaer, C.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2012, 117
  • [45] Weight assignment in regional climate models
    Christensen, Jens Hesselbjerg
    Kjellstrom, Erik
    Giorgi, Filippo
    Lenderink, Geert
    Rummukainen, Markku
    CLIMATE RESEARCH, 2010, 44 (2-3) : 179 - 194
  • [46] Reliability of regional and global climate models to simulate precipitation extremes over India
    Mishra, Vimal
    Kumar, Devashish
    Ganguly, Auroop R.
    Sanjay, J.
    Mujumdar, Milind
    Krishnan, R.
    Shah, Reepal D.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2014, 119 (15) : 9301 - 9323
  • [47] Regional climate modeling over China with COSMO-CLM: Performance assessment and climate projections
    Bucchignani, Edoardo
    Montesarchio, Myriam
    Cattaneo, Luigi
    Manzi, Maria Paola
    Mercogliano, Paola
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2014, 119 (21) : 12151 - 12170
  • [48] The southern African climate under 1.5 °C and 2 °C of global warming as simulated by CORDEX regional climate models
    Maure, G.
    Pinto, I.
    Ndebele-Murisa, M.
    Muthige, M.
    Lennard, C.
    Nikulin, G.
    Dosio, A.
    Meque, A.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 13 (06):
  • [49] Projected effects of climate change in precipitation and streamflows of the Upper Orinoco River Basin from global and regional climate models
    Salas, Hernan D.
    Builes-Jaramillo, Alejandro
    Florian, Carolina
    Valencia, Juliana
    Tamayo, Yesid
    Bermudez, Mariana
    Rodriguez, Melissa
    Echeverri, Katherine
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2024, 15 (07) : 3015 - 3032
  • [50] Uncertainty in projections of future lake thermal dynamics is differentially driven by lake and global climate models
    Wynne, Jacob H.
    Woelmer, Whitney
    Moore, Tadhg N.
    Thomas, R. Quinn
    Weathers, Kathleen C.
    Carey, Cayelan C.
    PEERJ, 2023, 11