Considerations in the Selection of Global Climate Models for Regional Climate Projections: The Arctic as a Case Study

被引:89
|
作者
Overland, James E. [1 ]
Wang, Muyin [2 ]
Bond, Nicholas A. [2 ]
Walsh, John E. [3 ]
Kattsov, Vladimir M. [4 ]
Chapman, William L. [5 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, PMEL, Seattle, WA 98185 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Joint Inst Study Atmosphere & Ocean, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK USA
[4] Voeikov Main Geophys Observ, St Petersburg, Russia
[5] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
SIMULATIONS; ENSEMBLE; BUDGET;
D O I
10.1175/2010JCLI3462.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Climate projections at regional scales are in increased demand from management agencies and other stake-holders. While global atmosphere ocean climate models provide credible quantitative estimates of future climate at continental scales and above, individual model performance varies for different regions, variables, and evaluation metrics-a less than satisfying situation. Using the high-latitude Northern Hemisphere as a focus, the authors assess strategies for providing regional projections based on global climate models. Starting with a set of model results obtained from an "ensemble of opportunity," the core of this procedure is to retain a subset of models through comparisons of model simulations with observations at both continental and regional scales. The exercise is more one of model culling than model selection. The continental-scale evaluation is a check on the large-scale climate physics of the models, and the regional-scale evaluation emphasizes variables of ecological or societal relevance. An additional consideration is given to the comprehensiveness of processes included in the models. In many but not all applications, different results are obtained from a reduced set of models compared to relying on the simple mean of all available models. For example, in the Arctic the top-performing models tend to be more sensitive to greenhouse forcing than the poorer-performing models. Because of the mostly unexplained inconsistencies in model performance under different selection criteria, simple and transparent evaluation methods are favored. The use of a single model is not recommended. For some applications, no model may be able to provide a suitable regional projection. The use of model evaluation strategies, as opposed to relying on simple averages of ensembles of opportunity, should be part of future synthesis activities such as the upcoming Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
引用
收藏
页码:1583 / 1597
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ensemble Evaluation and Member Selection of Regional Climate Models for Impact Models Assessment
    Minaei, Amin
    Todeschini, Sara
    Sitzenfrei, Robert
    Creaco, Enrico
    WATER, 2022, 14 (23)
  • [22] An evaluation method for uncertainties in regional climate projections
    Adachi, Sachiho A.
    Nishizawa, Seiya
    Ando, Kazuto
    Yamaura, Tsuyoshi
    Yoshida, Ryuji
    Yashiro, Hisashi
    Kajikawa, Yoshiyuki
    Tomita, Hirofumi
    ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE LETTERS, 2019, 20 (01):
  • [23] Uncertainty in Regional Climate Model Mean Runoff Projections under Climate Change: Case Study of Labrador's Churchill River Basin
    Roberts, Jonas
    Snelgrove, Ken
    ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN, 2015, 53 (03) : 319 - 331
  • [24] Uncertainties in Projections of the Baltic Sea Ecosystem Driven by an Ensemble of Global Climate Models
    Saraiva, Sofia
    Meier, H. E. Markus
    Andersson, Helen
    Hoglund, Anders
    Dieterich, Christian
    Groger, Matthias
    Hordoir, Robinson
    Eilola, Kari
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2019, 6
  • [25] Future snowfall in the Alps: projections based on the EURO-CORDEX regional climate models
    Frei, Prisco
    Kotlarski, Sven
    Liniger, Mark A.
    Schar, Christoph
    CRYOSPHERE, 2018, 12 (01) : 1 - 24
  • [26] Regional but not global temperature variability underestimated by climate models at supradecadal timescales
    Laepple, T.
    Ziegler, E.
    Weitzel, N.
    Hebert, R.
    Ellerhoff, B.
    Schoch, P.
    Martrat, B.
    Bothe, O.
    Moreno-Chamarro, E.
    Chevalier, M.
    Herbert, A.
    Rehfeld, K.
    NATURE GEOSCIENCE, 2023, 16 (11) : 958 - +
  • [27] Numerical simulation of surface solar radiation over Southern Africa. Part 2: projections of regional and global climate models
    Tang, Chao
    Morel, Beatrice
    Wild, Martin
    Pohl, Benjamin
    Abiodun, Babatunde
    Lennard, Chris
    Bessafi, Miloud
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2019, 53 (3-4) : 2197 - 2227
  • [28] Regional Flood Risk Projections under Climate Change
    Sharma, Sanjib
    Gomez, Michael
    Keller, Klaus
    Nicholas, Robert
    Mejia, Alfonso
    JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2021, 22 (09) : 2259 - 2274
  • [29] Precipitation over southern Africa: is there consensus among global climate models (GCMs), regional climate models (RCMs) and observational data?
    Karypidou, Maria Chara
    Katragkou, Eleni
    Sobolowski, Stefan Pieter
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 15 (08) : 3387 - 3404
  • [30] Temperature Extremes from Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM) Climate Change Projections
    Casati, Barbara
    de Elia, Ramon
    ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN, 2014, 52 (03) : 191 - 210