How do networks matter? The performance effects of interorganiztional networks

被引:142
作者
Gulati, Ranjay [1 ]
Lavie, Dovev [2 ]
Madhavan, Ravindranath [3 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Harvard Business Sch, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Technion Israel Inst Technol, IL-32000 Haifa, Israel
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
来源
RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR: AN ANNUAL SERIES OF ANALYTICAL ESSAYS AND CRITICAL REVIEWS, VOL 31 | 2011年 / 31卷
关键词
ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; STRATEGIC ALLIANCES; SOCIAL-STRUCTURE; COLLABORATION NETWORKS; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; FIRM CAPABILITIES; STRUCTURAL HOLES; VALUE CREATION; MARKET; EMBEDDEDNESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.riob.2011.09.005
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
A growing body of research suggests that an organization's tics to other organizations furnish resources that bestow various benefits. Scholars have proposed different perspectives on how such networks of ties shape organizational behavior and performance outcomes, but they have paid little attention to the underlying mechanisms driving these effects. We propose reach, richness, and receptivity as three fundamental mechanisms that jointly constitute a parsimonious model for explaining how network resources contribute to organizational performance. Reach is the extent to which an organization's network connects it to diverse and distant partners. Richness represents the potential value of the resources available to the organization through its ties to partners. Receptivity denotes the extent to which the organization can access and channel network resources across interorganizational boundaries. Whereas reach specifies how wide-ranging and heterogeneous the organization's network connections are, richness characterizes the value of the combinations of resources furnished by its partners. Receptivity in turn portrays how organizational capabilities and the quality of ties to partners facilitate flows of network resources. We propose that the interplay of these three mechanisms determines the benefits that the organization obtains from its network: reach and richness jointly determine the potential value of the network, while receptivity is crucial in realizing that potential. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 224
页数:18
相关论文
共 121 条
[1]  
Adler P.S., 2002, ACAD MANAGE REV, V27, P17
[2]  
Ahuja G, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P317, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<317::AID-SMJ90>3.3.CO
[3]  
2-2
[4]   Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study [J].
Ahuja, G .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (03) :425-455
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Social capital, DOI DOI 10.1108/14691930410550381
[6]  
[Anonymous], ORG SCI IN PRESS
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Structural Holes
[8]  
Arrow KJ, 2000, SOCIAL CAPITAL, P3
[9]   MARKET NETWORKS AND CORPORATE-BEHAVIOR [J].
BAKER, WE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1990, 96 (03) :589-625
[10]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120