Time course of sensory eye irritation in humans exposed to n-butanol and 1-octene

被引:30
作者
Hempel-Jorgensen, A
Kjaergaard, SK
Môlhave, L
Hudnell, HK
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Environm & Occupat Med, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[2] US EPA, Div Neurotoxicol, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH | 1999年 / 54卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00039899909602241
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this study, we investigated the time course effect of sensory eye irritation in 16 subjects exposed (i.e., eye only) to n-butanol and 1-octene. Half the subjects were exposed to n-butanol, and the remaining subjects were exposed to 1-octene. Each subject was studied on 5 different days; during each day each subject was exposed in three runs (i.e., run 1, run 2, and run 3) to a constant concentration of either n-butanol or 1-octene. We performed run 1 and run 3, both of which lasted 15 min each, to evaluate persistence in "sensitization." We performed run 2, which lasted 60 min, to study the time course of sensory irritation. Ratings of ocular irritation intensity were obtained continuously during all three runs. The exposure concentrations for n-butanol were 0 mg/m(3), 300 mg/m(3), 900 mg/m(3), and 3 000 mg/m(3), and the exposure concentrations for 1-octene were 0 mg/m(3), 6 000 mg/m(3), In 400 mg/m(3), and 18 000 mg/m(3). During run 2, we observed a slight increase in perceived eye irritation intensity for the lower concentrations of 1-octene and for all exposure concentrations of n-butanol. However, the threshold for irritation was clearly exceeded for only the 1-octene 10 400-mg/m(3) and 18 000-mg/m(3) exposures. During these two exposures, the response increased In-fold following 20-40 min of exposure during run 2, after which the response remained constant. We investigated the existence of persistence in "sensitization" by comparing intensity of responses between run 1 and run 3. Persistence in "sensitization" was apparent for only the 1-octene exposure.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 94
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
BASCOM R, 1997, ENV HLTH PERSPECT, V105
[2]   EFFECT OF ADAPTATION ON ODOR DETECTION [J].
BERGLUND, B ;
BERGLUND, U ;
ENGEN, T ;
LINDVALL, T .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1971, 9 (05) :435-&
[3]  
BERGLUND B, 1978, SENS PROCESS, V2, P191
[4]  
Bluyssen P. M., 1995, EUROPEAN AUDIT PROJE
[5]   EVALUATION OF THE SENSORY IRRITATION TEST FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL-HEALTH RISK [J].
BOS, PMJ ;
ZWART, A ;
REUZEL, PGJ ;
BRAGT, PC .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY, 1992, 21 (06) :423-450
[6]  
Cain W.S., 1974, ASHRAE Transactions, V80, P53
[7]   PERCEIVED INTENSITY OF ODOR AS A FUNCTION OF TIME OF ADAPTATION [J].
EKMAN, G ;
BERGLUND, B ;
BERGLUND, U ;
LINDVALL, T .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1967, 8 (03) :177-&
[8]  
ENGEN T, 1987, P IND AIR 1987 BERL, V2, P671
[9]  
HEMPELJORGENSEN A, 1996, ASTM STP, V1287, P350
[10]   EXPOSURE OF HUMANS TO A VOLATILE ORGANIC MIXTURE .2. SENSORY [J].
HUDNELL, HK ;
OTTO, DA ;
HOUSE, DE ;
MOLHAVE, L .
ARCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 1992, 47 (01) :31-38