Twelve lateral flow immunoassays (LFAs) to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies

被引:14
|
作者
Owen, Sophie, I [1 ]
Williams, Christopher T. [1 ]
Garrod, Gala [1 ]
Fraser, Alice J. [1 ]
Menzies, Stefanie [1 ]
Baldwin, Lisa [1 ]
Brown, Lottie [1 ]
Byrne, Rachel L. [1 ]
Collins, Andrea M. [2 ,4 ]
Cubas-Atienzar, Ana, I [1 ]
de Vos, Margaretha [3 ]
Edwards, Thomas [1 ]
Escadafal, Camille [3 ]
Ferreira, Daniela M. [4 ]
Fletcher, Tom [2 ]
Hyder-Wright, Angela [2 ,4 ]
Kay, Grant A. [1 ]
Kontogianni, Konstantina [1 ]
Mason, Jenifer [5 ]
Mitsi, Elena [4 ]
Planche, Tim [6 ,7 ]
Sacks, Jilian A. [3 ]
Taylor, Joseph [5 ]
Todd, Stacy [2 ]
Tully, Caroline [3 ]
Cuevas, Luis E. [1 ]
Adams, Emily R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool Sch Trop Med LSTM, Ctr Drugs & Diagnost Res, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[2] Liverpool Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] FIND, Geneva, Switzerland
[4] Liverpool Sch Trop Med LSTM, Dept Clin Sci, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[5] Liverpool Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Liverpool Clin Labs, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[6] St Georges Univ London, Inst Infect & Immun, London, England
[7] St Georges Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; Lateral flow immunoassays; COVID-19; IgM; IgG;
D O I
10.1016/j.jinf.2021.12.007
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: There are an abundance of commercially available lateral flow assays (LFAs) that detect antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. Whilst these are usually evaluated by the manufacturer, externally performed diagnostic accuracy studies to assess performance are essential. Herein we present an evaluation of 12 LFAs. Methods: Sera from 100 SARS-CoV-2 reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) positive participants were recruited through the FASTER study. A total of 105 pre-pandemic sera from participants with other infections were included as negative samples. Results: At presentation sensitivity against RT-PCR ranged from 37.4 to 79% for IgM/IgG, 30.3-74% for IgG, and 21.2-67% for IgM. Sensitivity for IgM/IgG improved >= 21days postsymptom onset for 10/12 tests. Specificity ranged from 74.3 to 99.1% for IgM/IgG, 82.9-100% for IgG, and 75.2-98% for IgM. Compared to the EuroImmun IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), sensitivity and specificity ranged from 44.6 to 95.4% and 85.4-100%, respectively. Conclusion: There are many LFAs available with varied sensitivity and specificity. Understanding the diagnostic accuracy of these tests will be vital as we come to rely more on the antibody status of a person moving forward, and as such manufacturer-independent evaluations are crucial. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Infection Association.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 360
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validity of at-home rapid antigen lateral flow assay and artificial intelligence read to detect SARS-CoV-2
    Richardson, Shannon
    Kohn, Michael A.
    Bollyky, Jenna
    Parsonnet, Julie
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2022, 104 (03)
  • [22] Retrospective clinical evaluation of 4 lateral flow assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgG
    McAulay, Kathrine
    Bryan, Andrew
    Greninger, Alexander L.
    Grill, Francisca
    Lake, Douglas
    Kaleta, Erin J.
    Grys, Thomas E.
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2020, 98 (03)
  • [23] Evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 lateral flow assay using the plaque reduction neutralization test
    Xie, Xuping
    Nielsen, Marisa C.
    Muruato, Antonio E.
    Fontes-Garfias, Camila R.
    Ren, Ping
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2021, 99 (02)
  • [24] Two SARS-CoV-2 IgG immunoassays comparison and time-course profile of antibodies response
    Dittadi, Ruggero
    Afshar, Haleh
    Carraro, Paolo
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2021, 99 (04)
  • [25] SARS-CoV-2 antibodies: Comparison of three high-throughput immunoassays versus the neutralization test
    Laterza, Riccardo
    Schirinzi, Annalisa
    Bruno, Rossella
    Genco, Rosa
    Contino, Renato
    Ostuni, Angelo
    Di Serio, Francesca
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2021, 51 (07)
  • [26] Clinical evaluation of four commercial immunoassays for the detection of antibodies against established SARS-CoV-2 infection
    Chua, Kyra Y. L.
    Vogrin, Sara
    Bittar, Intissar
    Horvath, Jennifer H.
    Wimaleswaran, Hari
    Trubiano, Jason A.
    Holmes, Natasha E.
    Lam, Que
    PATHOLOGY, 2020, 52 (07) : 778 - 782
  • [27] Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Responses and Seroconversion in COVID-19 Patients Using Twelve Commercial Immunoassays
    Yun, Sojeong
    Ryu, Ji Hyeong
    Jang, Joo Hee
    Bae, Hyunjoo
    Yoo, Seung-Hyo
    Choi, Ae-Ran
    Jo, Sung Jin
    Lim, Jihyang
    Lee, Jehoon
    Ryu, Hyejin
    Cho, Sung-Yeon
    Lee, Dong-Gun
    Lee, Jongmin
    Kim, Seok Chan
    Park, Yeon-Joon
    Lee, Hyeyoung
    Oh, Eun-Jee
    ANNALS OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2021, 41 (06) : 577 - +
  • [28] Comparison of Serological Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies
    James, Joe
    Rhodes, Shelley
    Ross, Craig S.
    Skinner, Paul
    Smith, Samuel P.
    Shipley, Rebecca
    Warren, Caroline J.
    Goharriz, Hooman
    McElhinney, Lorraine M.
    Temperton, Nigel
    Wright, Edward
    Fooks, Anthony R.
    Clark, Tristan W.
    Brookes, Sharon M.
    Brown, Ian H.
    Banyard, Ashley C.
    VIRUSES-BASEL, 2021, 13 (04):
  • [29] Dynamic Changes of Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in Close Contacts
    Yao, JinJian
    Wang, Hangfei
    Yu, Weiling
    Li, Yimin
    Luo, Zhiqian
    Wu, Biao
    Zhang, Wei
    Liu, Xiaoran
    Lv, Chuanzhu
    JOURNAL OF INFLAMMATION RESEARCH, 2021, 14 : 4233 - 4243
  • [30] Clinical Performance of a Lateral Flow SARS-CoV-2 Total Antibody Assay
    Cobb, Beth L.
    Lloyd, Matthew
    Hock, Karl G.
    Farnsworth, Christopher W.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2022, 7 (04) : 827 - 833