Twelve lateral flow immunoassays (LFAs) to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies

被引:14
|
作者
Owen, Sophie, I [1 ]
Williams, Christopher T. [1 ]
Garrod, Gala [1 ]
Fraser, Alice J. [1 ]
Menzies, Stefanie [1 ]
Baldwin, Lisa [1 ]
Brown, Lottie [1 ]
Byrne, Rachel L. [1 ]
Collins, Andrea M. [2 ,4 ]
Cubas-Atienzar, Ana, I [1 ]
de Vos, Margaretha [3 ]
Edwards, Thomas [1 ]
Escadafal, Camille [3 ]
Ferreira, Daniela M. [4 ]
Fletcher, Tom [2 ]
Hyder-Wright, Angela [2 ,4 ]
Kay, Grant A. [1 ]
Kontogianni, Konstantina [1 ]
Mason, Jenifer [5 ]
Mitsi, Elena [4 ]
Planche, Tim [6 ,7 ]
Sacks, Jilian A. [3 ]
Taylor, Joseph [5 ]
Todd, Stacy [2 ]
Tully, Caroline [3 ]
Cuevas, Luis E. [1 ]
Adams, Emily R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool Sch Trop Med LSTM, Ctr Drugs & Diagnost Res, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[2] Liverpool Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] FIND, Geneva, Switzerland
[4] Liverpool Sch Trop Med LSTM, Dept Clin Sci, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[5] Liverpool Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Liverpool Clin Labs, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[6] St Georges Univ London, Inst Infect & Immun, London, England
[7] St Georges Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; Lateral flow immunoassays; COVID-19; IgM; IgG;
D O I
10.1016/j.jinf.2021.12.007
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: There are an abundance of commercially available lateral flow assays (LFAs) that detect antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. Whilst these are usually evaluated by the manufacturer, externally performed diagnostic accuracy studies to assess performance are essential. Herein we present an evaluation of 12 LFAs. Methods: Sera from 100 SARS-CoV-2 reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) positive participants were recruited through the FASTER study. A total of 105 pre-pandemic sera from participants with other infections were included as negative samples. Results: At presentation sensitivity against RT-PCR ranged from 37.4 to 79% for IgM/IgG, 30.3-74% for IgG, and 21.2-67% for IgM. Sensitivity for IgM/IgG improved >= 21days postsymptom onset for 10/12 tests. Specificity ranged from 74.3 to 99.1% for IgM/IgG, 82.9-100% for IgG, and 75.2-98% for IgM. Compared to the EuroImmun IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), sensitivity and specificity ranged from 44.6 to 95.4% and 85.4-100%, respectively. Conclusion: There are many LFAs available with varied sensitivity and specificity. Understanding the diagnostic accuracy of these tests will be vital as we come to rely more on the antibody status of a person moving forward, and as such manufacturer-independent evaluations are crucial. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Infection Association.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 360
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lateral Flow Immunoassays for SARS-CoV-2
    Ang, Geik Yong
    Chan, Kok Gan
    Yean, Chan Yean
    Yu, Choo Yee
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (11)
  • [2] Evaluation of Simple Lateral Flow Immunoassays for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies
    Nickel, Olaf
    Rockstroh, Alexandra
    Borte, Stephan
    Wolf, Johannes
    VACCINES, 2022, 10 (03)
  • [3] Quantitative circular flow immunoassays with trained object recognition to detect antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 membrane glycoprotein
    Huang, Ryan Yuki
    Herr, Deron Raymond
    BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 565 : 8 - 13
  • [4] Comparison of commercial lateral flow immunoassays and ELISA for SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection
    Serrano, Maria Martinez
    Rodriguez, David Navalpotro
    Palop, Nuria Tormo
    Arenas, Roberto Olmos
    Cordoba, Marta Moreno
    Mochon, Ma Dolores Ocete
    Cardona, Concepcion Gimeno
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2020, 129
  • [5] Accuracy of four lateral flow immunoassays for anti SARS-CoV-2 antibodies: a head-to-head comparative study
    Jones, Hayley E.
    Mulchandani, Ranya
    Taylor-Phillips, Sian
    Ades, A. E.
    Shute, Justin
    Perry, Keith R.
    Chandra, Nastassya L.
    Brooks, Tim
    Charlett, Andre
    Hickman, Matthew
    Oliver, Isabel
    Kaptoge, Stephen
    Danesh, John
    Di Angelantonio, Emanuele
    Wyllie, David
    EBIOMEDICINE, 2021, 68
  • [6] Performance of Three SARS-CoV-2 Immunoassays, Three Rapid Lateral Flow Tests, and a Novel Bead-Based Affinity Surrogate Test for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Human Serum
    Krone, Manuel
    Guetling, Julia
    Wagener, Johannes
    Lam, Thien-Tri
    Schoen, Christoph
    Vogel, Ulrich
    Stich, August
    Wedekink, Florian
    Wischhusen, Joerg
    Kerkau, Thomas
    Beyersdorf, Niklas
    Klingler, Silvana
    Backes, Simone
    Doelken, Lars
    Gasteiger, Georg
    Kurzai, Oliver
    Schubert-Unkmeir, Alexandra
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 59 (08)
  • [7] Comparative evaluation of six immunoassays for the detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2
    Perez-Garcia, Felipe
    Perez-Tanoira, Ramon
    Iglesias, Maria Esther
    Romanyk, Juan
    Arroyo, Teresa
    Gomez-Herruz, Pena
    Gonzalez, Rosa
    Lapena Garcia, Sara
    Cuadros-Gonzalez, Juan
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2021, 289
  • [8] Current immunoassays and detection of antibodies elicited by Omicron SARS-CoV-2 infection
    Migueres, Marion
    Chapuy-Regaud, Sabine
    Miedouge, Marcel
    Jamme, Thibaut
    Lougarre, Catherine
    Da Silva, Isabelle
    Pucelle, Melanie
    Staes, Laetitia
    Porcheron, Marion
    Dimeglio, Chloe
    Izopet, Jacques
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2023, 95 (01)
  • [9] The kinetics of viral load and antibodies to SARS-CoV-2
    Sun, Jiufeng
    Tang, Xi
    Bai, Ru
    Liang, Chumin
    Zeng, Lilian
    Lin, Huifang
    Yuan, Runyu
    Zhou, Pingping
    Huang, Xuhe
    Xiong, Qianlin
    Peng, Jinju
    Cui, Fengfu
    Ke, Bixia
    Su, Juan
    Liu, Zhe
    Lu, Jing
    Tian, Junzhang
    Sun, Ruilin
    Ke, Changwen
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2020, 26 (12) : 1690.e1 - 1690.e4
  • [10] Development of automated microfluidic immunoassays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and antigen
    Johnson, Linwood
    Bartlett, Maggie L.
    Ramirez, Francisco
    Heger, Christopher D.
    Smith, Darci R.
    JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS, 2024, 524