Use of the World Health Organization guidelines on cancer pain relief before referral to a specialized pain service

被引:14
作者
Felleiter, P [1 ]
Gustorff, B [1 ]
Lierz, P [1 ]
Hornykewycz, S [1 ]
Kress, HG [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klin Wien, Abt Allgemeine Anasthesie & Intensivmed B, Vienna, Austria
来源
SCHMERZ | 2005年 / 19卷 / 04期
关键词
clinical-protocols-standards; pain-clinics; pain-drug-therapy; practice-guidelines; World-Health-Organization;
D O I
10.1007/s00482-004-0338-y
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
In 1986 the World Health Organization (WHO) released guidelines for cancer pain relief. Since then, several controlled studies on effectiveness and practicability of these guidelines have been published. Various authors described inadequate use of these guidelines. We analysed, whether the pain medication of 160 cancer patients referred to the anesthesiological pain clinic at the university hospital of Vienna corresponded to the WHO guidelines or not. Adequacy of pain treatment was assessed using the pain management index (PMI). Multiple criteria were chosen to assess the conformity of the treatment with the guidelines. Furthermore we studied the effect of a strict use of the WHO guidelines in these patients. The average pain intensity of the referred patients was 75 mm (VAS). Negative PMI scores, indicating inadequate pain therapy, were fount in 39% of cases. A violation of the rules was found in 38% of the therapy schedules. Pain medication was then modified by switching to fixed time intervals, escalation of the steps of the WHO ladder, increasing the dosage or treating neuropathic pain with adjuvant drugs. Two weeks later the average pain score of the patients was reduced to 27 mm (VAS). At that time 72% of the patients quoted an adequate reduction of pain. Inadequate knowledge or disregard of the WHO guidelines for cancer pain relief are common and result in unnecessary and prolonged suffering in these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / +
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [11] WHO recommendations for treatment of tumor pain. Development of an evaluation system
    Radbruch, L
    Sabatowski, R
    Loick, G
    Brunsch-Radbruch, A
    Lehmann, KA
    [J]. SCHMERZ, 1999, 13 (04): : 259 - 265
  • [12] Sabatowski R, 2001, SCHMERZ, V15, P241, DOI 10.1007/s004820100054
  • [13] Schug S A, 1990, J Pain Symptom Manage, V5, P27, DOI 10.1016/S0885-3924(05)80006-5
  • [14] WHEN IS CANCER PAIN MILD, MODERATE OR SEVERE - GRADING PAIN SEVERITY BY ITS INTERFERENCE WITH FUNCTION
    SERLIN, RC
    MENDOZA, TR
    NAKAMURA, Y
    EDWARDS, KR
    CLEELAND, CS
    [J]. PAIN, 1995, 61 (02) : 277 - 284
  • [15] Takeda F., 1986, PAIN CLINIC, V1, P83
  • [16] Determining the effectiveness of a clinical-practice intervention in improving the control of pain in outpatients with cancer
    Trowbridge, R
    Dugan, W
    Jay, SJ
    Littrell, D
    Casebeer, LL
    Edgerton, S
    Anderson, J
    OToole, JB
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1997, 72 (09) : 798 - 800
  • [17] VENTAFRIDDA V, 1987, CANCER, V59, P851
  • [18] Walker V A, 1988, J Pain Symptom Manage, V3, P145, DOI 10.1016/0885-3924(88)90160-1
  • [19] World Health Organization, 1986, Cancer Pain Relief
  • [20] VALIDATION OF WORLD-HEALTH-ORGANIZATION GUIDELINES FOR CANCER PAIN RELIEF - A 10-YEAR PROSPECTIVE-STUDY
    ZECH, DFJ
    GROND, S
    LYNCH, J
    HERTEL, D
    LEHMANN, KA
    [J]. PAIN, 1995, 63 (01) : 65 - 76