Comparison of Synthetic Computed Tomography Generation Methods, Incorporating Male and Female Anatomical Differences, for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Only Definitive Pelvic Radiotherapy

被引:13
|
作者
O'Connor, Laura M. [1 ,2 ]
Choi, Jae H. [1 ,3 ]
Dowling, Jason A. [4 ]
Warren-Forward, Helen [2 ]
Martin, Jarad [1 ,5 ]
Greer, Peter B. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Calvary Mater Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Newcastle, Sch Hlth Sci, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Newcastle, Sch Math & Phys Sci, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[4] CSIRO, Australian E Hlth Res Ctr, Herston, Qld, Australia
[5] Univ Newcastle, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 12卷
关键词
MRI radiotherapy planning; image-guided radiotherapy; synthetic CT; computer-assisted radiotherapy planning; rectum neoplasms; cervix neoplasms; endometrium neoplasms; anal canal neoplasms; BEAM RADIATION-THERAPY; CT GENERATION; ELECTRON-DENSITY; MRI; FEASIBILITY;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2022.822687
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeThere are several means of synthetic computed tomography (sCT) generation for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-only planning; however, much of the research omits large pelvic treatment regions and female anatomical specific methods. This research aimed to apply four of the most popular methods of sCT creation to facilitate MRI-only radiotherapy treatment planning for male and female anorectal and gynecological neoplasms. sCT methods were validated against conventional computed tomography (CT), with regard to Hounsfield unit (HU) estimation and plan dosimetry. Methods and MaterialsPaired MRI and CT scans of 40 patients were used for sCT generation and validation. Bulk density assignment, tissue class density assignment, hybrid atlas, and deep learning sCT generation methods were applied to all 40 patients. Dosimetric accuracy was assessed by dose difference at reference point, dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters, and 3D gamma dose comparison. HU estimation was assessed by mean error and mean absolute error in HU value between each sCT and CT. ResultsThe median percentage dose difference between the CT and sCT was <1.0% for all sCT methods. The deep learning method resulted in the lowest median percentage dose difference to CT at -0.03% (IQR 0.13, -0.31) and bulk density assignment resulted in the greatest difference at -0.73% (IQR -0.10, -1.01). The mean 3D gamma dose agreement at 3%/2 mm among all sCT methods was 99.8%. The highest agreement at 1%/1 mm was 97.3% for the deep learning method and the lowest was 93.6% for the bulk density method. Deep learning and hybrid atlas techniques gave the lowest difference to CT in mean error and mean absolute error in HU estimation. ConclusionsAll methods of sCT generation used in this study resulted in similarly high dosimetric agreement for MRI-only planning of male and female cancer pelvic regions. The choice of the sCT generation technique can be guided by department resources available and image guidance considerations, with minimal impact on dosimetric accuracy.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [31] A comparison of the diagnostic ability of 1-mm computed tomography and 3-mm magnetic resonance imaging for detecting lateral pelvic lymph node metastases from rectal cancer
    Kobayashi, Ryutaro
    Uehara, Kay
    Ebata, Tomoki
    Yatsuya, Hiroshi
    Li, Yuanying
    Hida, Koya
    Hashiguchi, Yojiro
    Ishihara, Soichiro
    Ogawa, Shimpei
    Shiomi, Akio
    Kawai, Kazushige
    Ajioka, Yoichi
    SURGERY TODAY, 2025,
  • [32] Tumor Volumes Measured From Static and Dynamic 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Scan: Comparison of Different Methods Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging as the Criterion Standard
    Chen, Hanwei
    Jiang, Jinzhao
    Gao, Junling
    Liu, Dan
    Axelsson, Jan
    Cui, Minyi
    Gong, Nan-Jie
    Feng, Shi-Ting
    Luo, Liangping
    Huang, Bingsheng
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2014, 38 (02) : 209 - 215