Factors affecting primary care physician decision-making for patients with complex multimorbidity: a qualitative interview study

被引:8
作者
Schuttner, Linnaea [1 ,2 ]
Hockett Sherlock, Stacey [3 ,4 ]
Simons, Carol [1 ]
Ralston, James D. [5 ,6 ]
Rosland, Ann-Marie [7 ,8 ]
Nelson, Karin [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Lee, Jennifer R. [1 ,9 ]
Sayre, George [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] VA Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Hlth Serv Res & Dev, 1660 S Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] VA Iowa City Hlth Care Syst, Comprehens Access & Delivery Res & Evaluat CADRE, Iowa City, IA USA
[4] Univ Iowa, Carver Coll Med, Iowa City, IA USA
[5] Kaiser Permanente Washington Hlth Res Inst, Seattle, WA USA
[6] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Syst & Populat Hlth, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[7] VA Pittsburgh Healthcare Syst, VA Ctr Hlth Equ Res & Promot, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[8] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[9] Univ Washington, Dept Urol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源
BMC PRIMARY CARE | 2022年 / 23卷 / 01期
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
Multimorbidity; Veterans; Primary care; Qualitative research; Clinical decision-making; OLDER PERSONS; GUIDELINES; EXPERIENCES; MEDICARE; DISEASES;
D O I
10.1186/s12875-022-01633-x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Patients with multiple chronic conditions (multimorbidity) and additional psychosocial complexity are at higher risk of adverse outcomes. Establishing treatment or care plans for these patients must account for their disease interactions, finite self-management abilities, and even conflicting treatment recommendations from clinical practice guidelines. Despite existing insight into how primary care physicians (PCPs) approach care decisions for their patients in general, less is known about how PCPs make care planning decisions for more complex populations particularly within a medical home setting. We therefore sought to describe factors affecting physician decision-making when care planning for complex patients with multimorbidity within the team-based, patient-centered medical home setting in the integrated healthcare system of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Methods This was a qualitative study involving semi-structured telephone interviews with PCPs working > 40% time in VHA clinics. Interviews were conducted from April to July, 2020. Content was analyzed with deductive and inductive thematic analysis. Results 23 physicians participated in interviews; most were MDs (n = 21) and worked in hospital-affiliated clinics (n = 14) across all regions of the VHA's national clinic network. We found internal, external, and relationship-based factors, with developed subthemes describing factors affecting decision-making for complex patients with multimorbidity. Physicians described tailoring decisions to individual patients; making decisions in keeping with an underlying internal style or habit; working towards an overarching goal for care; considering impacts from patient access and resources on care plans; deciding within boundaries provided by organizational structures; collaborating on care plans with their care team; and impacts on decisions from their own emotions and relationship with patient. Conclusions PCPs described internal, external, and relationship-based factors that affected their care planning for high-risk and complex patients with multimorbidity in the VHA. Findings offer useful strategies employed by physicians to effectively conduct care planning for complex patients in a medical home setting, such as delegation of follow-up within multidisciplinary care teams, optimizing visit time vs frequency, and deliberate investment in patient-centered relationship building to gain buy-in to care plans.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
[11]   Mixed Methods Evaluation of Reasons Why Care Deviates From Clinical Guidelines Among Patients With Multimorbidity [J].
Cohen-Stavi, Chandra J. ;
Key, Calanit ;
Molcho, Tchiya ;
Yacobi, Mili ;
Balicer, Ran D. ;
Shadmi, Efrat .
MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2022, 79 (01) :102-113
[12]  
CRAIG P, 2008, J GEN INTERN MED, V337, DOI DOI 10.1136/BMJ.A1655
[13]   Impact of Comorbidity on Colorectal Cancer Screening Cost-Effectiveness Study in Diabetic Populations [J].
Dinh, Tuan A. ;
Alperin, Peter ;
Walter, Louise C. ;
Smith, Robert .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 (06) :730-738
[14]   Dual processing model of medical decision-making [J].
Djulbegovic, Benjamin ;
Hozo, Iztok ;
Beckstead, Jason ;
Tsalatsanis, Athanasios ;
Pauker, Stephen G. .
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2012, 12
[15]  
Ellis Beverley, 2010, Inform Prim Care, V18, P135
[16]   Decision making biases in the allied health professions: A systematic scoping review [J].
Featherston, Rebecca ;
Downie, Laura E. ;
Vogel, Adam P. ;
Galvin, Karyn L. .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (10)
[17]  
Fihn S.D., 2013, Care Assessment Need (CAN) score and the Patient Care Assessment System (PCAS): Tools for Care Management
[18]   Effects of Benefits and Harms on Older Persons' Willingness to Take Medication for Primary Cardiovascular Prevention [J].
Fried, Terri R. ;
Tinetti, Mary E. ;
Towle, Virginia ;
O'Leary, John R. ;
Iannone, Lynne .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 171 (10) :923-928
[19]   Primary Care Clinicians' Experiences With Treatment Decision Making for Older Persons With Multiple Conditions [J].
Fried, Terri R. ;
Tinetti, Mary E. ;
Iannone, Lynne .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 171 (01) :75-80
[20]   Non-clinical influences on clinical decision-making: a major challenge to evidence-based practice [J].
Hajjaj, F. M. ;
Salek, M. S. ;
Basra, M. K. A. ;
Finlay, A. Y. .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2010, 103 (05) :178-187